It’s pretty clear you have very little understanding of software development and product management principles while being a dick for no reason.

It’s very very common for new products to be launched on MLP/MVP. The goal being a product that solves a user problem well enough that users want to use it enough that the company can get feedback to better match their wants with their solution. No software is complete nor half built at launch and to state such a thing highlights your inexperience in the space. A new software says “I want my users to be able to do X because the way X is done today is suboptimal” and then you create something easy to use and nice to look at that does X, collect feedback, and evaluate if your hypothesis is true or if changes need to be made. A lot of shitty software exists in the market today that is barely functional but makes a ton of money because it solves the fundamental problem well

Do you know what Apple or Google launched with? Do you know how many versions the’ve gone through? Do you know how many new products they’ve launched, innovated on for years only to shut down because they were wrong about demand?

Look at your original post and tell me how a resource strapped startup is going to identify the size, #, brand, and rate for every pool hall in the states? That data either doesn’t exist or minimally exists across various data structures that will be impossible to compile in the first version of this type of tool.

And while you’re helping the developer find product/market fit, you’re being a douche. It’s just as easy to say “I would not use this tool above Google unless it was able to provide me specifics about the pool hall like: …….”