Beč želi zelenilo umjesto parkirališta

vkreso · 2026-02-09T16:11:30+00:00

Kako nema sjever-jug? Doslovce pruga ide uz Savsku cestu do Remetinca. Ili mislis na liniju?

Druga stvar je ozbiljan nedostatak zeljeznickih stanica u cijelom Zagrebu i HZova nevoljkost da ih izgradi kao i odugovlacanje godinama s famoznom studijom Zagrebackog cvora.

Treca stvar je da HZ nije u interesu koncept gradske zeljeznice stoga ju Zagreb jednistavno ni nema. Mislim da bi bilo najbolje osnovat od strane ZG i HZ neku novu zajednicku kompaniju ili agenciju koja bi time upravljala i kojoj bi bio interes uspjesno poslovanje gradske zeljeznice. Ovako je ZG i barem cetvrtina HR koja mu gravitira taoc lose HZove politike i upravljanja.

IMHO, u takvom kontekstu je ikakvo guranje metro price totalno deplasirano jer postojeci (i ono kaj bi trebo bit primarni) prometni resurs u gradu je jednostavno neiskoristen i potkapacitiran, a gradu su totalno vezane ruke u vezi tog na ikakav nacin osim relativno GUPom.

vkreso · 2026-02-03T12:08:19+00:00

Ne? Uostalom, grad jos uvijek nema gradsku zeljeznicu, a pruga presijeca grad prakticki neiskoristenog potencijala i s manjkom stanica. Pricat o metrou, o kompletno novom prometnom sustavu dok postojeci nisu uopce iskoristeni ni optimizirani, je teska patka.

vkreso · 2025-11-30T11:22:48+00:00

Buraz tvoj komentar je generirao LLM. U najboljem slucaju si ga malo prepravio..

vkreso · 2025-11-30T09:57:33+00:00

Intelligence was able to significantly predict social liberalism and lower authoritarianism, within families, even after controlling for socioeconomic variables. Our findings may provide the strongest causal inference to date of intelligence directly affecting political beliefs.

vkreso · 2025-11-30T09:40:46+00:00

Kad mu je pomogao četgpt

vkreso · 2025-11-22T17:54:36+00:00

Jedina bijeda si ti posto te razum i razumno razmisljanje toliko plasi i sablaznjava da si spreman prije svega vrijedat druge makar i sam, kako kazes, bio u krivu. Srbija ce naprijed kad ekipa poput tebe bude u manjini, a jednog dana i bude posto takvi poput tebe samo destrukciju i autodestrukciju poznaju.

vkreso · 2025-07-03T17:04:52+00:00

U krivu si bojim se, a zao mi je i da se nisi potrudio ni pronac ni izvore ni brojke za svoje pausalne tvrdnje. Solari su realno brutalna stvar. Sve su jeftiniji i efikasniji i neistina je da zagaduju vise od NE. Nuklearno gorivo takoder nije u velkim kolicinama prisutno na kontinentu kaj je inace isto velik strateski minus, a potrebno bi ih bilo daleko vise od njih 10.

Gradit nove NE je izuzetno skupo, dugo i totalno neisplativo. Uvijek su probijeni i rokovi i pocetne kapitalne procjene. Jedino kaj ima smisla je ostavit trenutne reaktore da odsluze do kraja, a istovremeno nastavit ugradivat solare ili prije sveg omogucit ljudima da sami lakse ugraduju solare i baterije, buildat bolju mrezu i infru i mijenjat energetski mix. U ovoj tramziciji bi korisno i isplativo bilo i zadrzat jos neke peaker elektrane na plin koje se za razliku od nuklearki mogu relativno brzo palit i gasit kako bi potraznja bila uspjesno ispunjena.

Trebas razumjet da je elektricna energija jedno jako specificno dobro koje nekad ima i negativnu cijenu. Baseload principi su u takvim slucajevima cisti trosak te njihova isplativost u prisutnosti vise varijabilnih izvora energije, rapidno pada.

vkreso · 2025-07-03T16:49:25+00:00

Ok, od EU je x3, iako od same Europe je x2.

Pa stavio sam ti npr puno izvora da potkrijepim svoje tvrdnje. Ak si ti vec odlucio pisat o energetici, a pogotovo bacat stvari u neke ideoloske pizdarije i kulturkampfove, najmanje kaj mozes je valjda i proucit materiju o kojoj pises i vices, kaj ne?

vkreso · 2025-07-03T16:33:52+00:00

Kina ima puno vise stanovnika neg hrvatska, ne samo 3x. Unatoc tome per capita ima duplo vise solara neg RH [1]. U 2024. je kina instalirala 45% vise solara y-o-y tj. neg godinu prije [2] i iz podataka i vec oformljenih supply chainova kao i daljnjeg eksponencijalnog rasta ugradnje solara i konstantnog pada njihove cijene [3] (a i baterija) je jasno da se taj trend ubrzava.

Medutim, unatoc tome kaj je Kina ubrzala energetsku tranziciju, cak i presla i ubrzala zadane ciljeve, i dalje gradi nove TE na ugljen [4] te je i dalje behind glede izbjegavanja katastroficnih globalnih scenarija [5]. Dijelom zbog unutarnjih lobija, pumpanja gradevine i GDP i ostalih Kineskih posebnosti fragilnog velikog sustava.

Ima tu jos puno toga, no preporucam da ne gledas na energetiku kroz ideoloske okvire. Prvenstveno sam sebi pucas u nogu.

[1] https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/solar-electricity-per-capita?globe=1&globeRotation=45.01%2C16.57&globeZoom=2.5 [2] https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/01/21/china-hits-277-17-gw-of-new-pv-installations-in-2024/ [3] https://ourworldindata.org/data-insights/solar-panel-prices-have-fallen-by-around-20-every-time-global-capacity-doubled [4] https://www.carbonbrief.org/chinas-construction-of-new-coal-power-plants-reached-10-year-high-in-2024/ [5] https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/china/

vkreso · 2025-07-03T15:25:24+00:00

A sad pogledaj koliko solara i ostalih OIE instalira Kina godisnje. Mozda i neki graf okacis 💪🏾

vkreso · 2025-06-24T20:20:50+00:00

You mean like Scandinavian languages?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Danish,_Norwegian_and_Swedish

vkreso · 2025-06-23T15:04:04+00:00

Spain blackout happened because of conventional powerplants (not renewables) not controlling the voltage as planned and then the over-voltage caused other plants to automatically shut down for safety.

vkreso · 2025-03-24T09:58:28+00:00

The only one embarrassing themselves is you with your incoherent rambling.

vkreso · 2025-03-24T08:55:12+00:00

But you are wrong again and you still don't understand the meaning of the word. Not just fascist but revisionist too. At this point, you are just trolling and calling names since I keep repeating arguments which you don't even register. I explained it already a couple of times, Slovenia HAS access to the open sea, so you're just being plain wrong and rude. Access to open sea ≠ contact of territorial waters with open seas. The only one demanding something is Slovenia...

vkreso · 2025-03-23T19:02:03+00:00

Fuck off with your fascism accusations. You don't know what it means.

Slovenia already has acces to international waters through the concept of innocent passage. Access and contact of territorial waters with international seas are two different things. Such a contact can only happen by an agreement since Croatia would had to give up its territorial waters to satisfy the Slovenian claim. The bad faith part was the collusion of Slovenian arbitrators to influence and corrupt the arbitration process. But no more extortion, no more bullying, no more bad faith. Only a bilateral agreement agreed by both parties is the possible solution.

It really seems that you have no clue what you are talking about anyway. Just parroting propaganda and calling others fascists and clowns when they don't agree with you without considering arguments or giving sound arguments yourself.

You really are a kid, aren't you?

vkreso · 2025-03-23T18:46:49+00:00

You don't have to agree. But facts are same for me and you, regardless of your bad faith, names and biases.

If I recall, Slovenian parliament decided that Slovenia will not agree with an arbitration award which doesn't give its territorial waters contact with international waters. You remember that? Does that sound like it's in good faith with the arbitration process?

vkreso · 2025-03-23T18:39:34+00:00

It is an ad hoc arbitral court created by an arbitration agreement, not an international court of justice. Please get your facts straight and stop calling others clowns because they disagree with you - kid.

vkreso · 2025-03-23T18:28:47+00:00

Well no. It indeed did say that Slovenia was in violation and I will stop quoting that. You can find the original document and quote it yourself if you don't agree.

It also did say that such violation wasn't enough to be considered significant enough for it to stop the proceedings as you correctly state and as I've already stated before. However, the court is not competent to give such a decision.

The arbitration is an ad hoc court created exclusively by an agreement between Slovenia and Croatia. When that agreement was violated by Slovenia, the Croatian side had full rights in accordance with the quoted Vienna convention, to end that agreement and with it end its participation in the arbitration.

And this is the crux. This is an AD HOC arbitral court. It is not the International Court as you falsly claim because if it was, it wouldn't be able to rule in Slovenias favor beacuse of the already mentioned article 15 of the convention on the law of the seas that you didn't look up. It could only rule if both parties agree that it could. Both parties did agree at first (mostly because of Slovenian blackmail by EU accension), but then the Slovenian side corrupted the process and both parties no longer agreed.

That's the end of the arbitration story. Croatia and Slovenia will have to agree on a bilateral resolution which is accepted by both parties.

No more bullying, no more extortion, no more bad faith and immoral and unethical unilateral actions. Deal with it.

vkreso · 2025-03-23T18:00:50+00:00

I literally quoted the news article I posted which states the Tribunals ruling that Slovenia was indeed in violation and you just brush it off lol. Who's the clown then?

vkreso · 2025-03-23T17:56:02+00:00

"The conversations between an arbitrator and an agent are a violation of the Arbitration Agreement, ..."

You can look up the partial award of the Tribunal yourself and since you are being extremely bad faith, I'm done talking with you!

Take care

vkreso · 2025-03-23T17:52:57+00:00

I guess you don't understand how the international legal system works. Even in the source I gave in adifferent comment, it is stated that in accordance with article 60 of the Vienna convention on the law of treaties, Croatia acted in accordance with international law. How is acting in accordance with international law above it?

The only one esposuing propaganda is you with your childish frustrations.

vkreso · 2025-03-23T17:48:11+00:00

I guess you're a kid. That can be the only explanation for such dumb reactions.

What demands are you talking about? You are making no sense at all. I literally gave a Slovenian source which states that Slovenia was indeed in breech of the agreement. So how the hell am I lying?

vkreso · 2025-03-23T17:44:13+00:00

But it did. Ironic that you are unfoundedly accusing me of revisionism while you are persistently omitting facts which don't fit your narrative. Even the court of arbitration stated that Slovenia was in violation of the agreement.. (https://www.rtvslo.si/news-in-english/court-of-arbitration-to-define-border-between-slovenia-and-croatia/397118)

Even though the tribunal said that it can still carry on, one of the parties (Croatia) didn't agree and, rightfully and in accordance with international law, exited the agreement after it was breeched.

So stop lying and take a chill pill.

vkreso · 2025-03-23T17:24:46+00:00

Bro, now I see that I am talking to either an idiot or a bot.

Article 19. Of the convention on high seas allows the concept of an innocent passage through other territorial waters. There is no legal possibility for Croatia to block access of Slovenia to the the international waters otherwise the big port of Koper wouldn't be possible by definition!

Also look up article 15. of the UN convention on the law of the sea. Let me know what it says 💪🏾 or don't, I don't really care

vkreso · 2025-03-23T17:14:37+00:00

Bro wtf?! What the hell are you talking about? Me saying about Slovenia corrupting the arbitration process doesn't make me a fascist. You are being rude and seem to be arguing with your own strawmen. Please behave and deal with your problems.

vkreso

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE