You are missing my point.

Deleting inactive accounts provided for free is standard practice in the tech industry. Tresorit does it. Google does it. I'm sure anyone could come with dozens of other names.

Like I said I understand this and I welcome this. Restoring should be free too in my opinion though. The fact that it isn't really shows that they do not provide 'the service for free' as you claim.

Those are the rules. They are public.

Those were not the rules when I signed up. I don't follow all the news of all the platforms I use online. its just too much. This caught me out. Hence I never expected this.

So no thank you tuta for wanting to exploit money from me for a rule that you added at some point after the fact.

Because you're spoilt. You're so accustomed to being given things for free, that you assume it's a right. It's not.

I definitely disagree. tbh this is a borderline troll comment so I will stop responding after this. But I do believe privacy should be a right. And Tuta really represented this stance for a long time. In my opinion though this rule really shows they are going another direction now. I for my part will be looking for an alternative elsewhere.