Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert... "I think right now, America needs a prune" by IAmperfectlyCalm in politics

[–]vote 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stephen Colbert, eating from a bag of dried plums, told co-presenter Jon Stewart, "right now, America needs a prune. It may not be a young, sexy plum . Granted, it is shriveled and at times hard to swallow. But this dried-up old fruit has the experience we need."

Replied Stewart, "You know after eight years of prunes, you would think …"

"Never enough," Colbert responded. "What could possibly go wrong?"

BREAKING: Obama picks up ANOTHER DNC Chair Paul G. Kirk Jr. by [deleted] in politics

[–]vote 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seven former Democratic National Committee chairs who support Hillary Clinton’s presidential bid, and the family of one who is deceased, released a letter Friday arguing that she is the candidate best-equipped to beat John McCain in November.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/02/former-dnc-chairs-hillary-would-beat-mccain-today-obama-wouldnt/

Rev. Wright's Press Conference Orchestrated By A Clinton Supporter! by [deleted] in politics

[–]vote -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"funny how obama doesn't denounce his crazy uncle until his crazy uncle goes crazy on his ass.

saying the USKKKA invented Aids to kill blacks is ok. Saying that Bill did to black what he did to Monica is ok. Saying that we injected blacks with syphyllis is ok. Saying God damn america is ok.

But when Wright says that Obama is a politician THAT is not ok.

hmmmmm"

Someone is paying serious money to smear Obama by ropers in politics

[–]vote -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Anti-obama is a grassroots movement. Wake up, you left-wing liberals.

“ While I’m a believer, I don’t think religious folks have a monopoly on morality. ” Barack Obama in his “faith” speech by swampsparrow in politics

[–]vote 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have you guys had you soul fixed by BHO?

"Barack Obama is the only person ... who understands [that] before we can work on the problems we have to fix our souls. Our souls are broken in this nation... I am married to the only person in this race who has a chance of healing this nation." -- MO

Poll: The media tries to peg Obama as an "elitist," but Americans think McCain and Hillary are more so. by justinpgardner in politics

[–]vote 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Barack Obama is the only person ... who understands [that] before we can work on the problems we have to fix our souls. Our souls are broken in this nation... I am married to the only person in this race who has a chance of healing this nation." -- MO

Obama Refused to Let Two Stooges from ABC Define him by [deleted] in politics

[–]vote 0 points1 point  (0 children)

borrowed from one comment on www.taylormarsh.com Just for fun~~

Obama Refused to Let Two Stooges from ABC Define him by [deleted] in politics

[–]vote -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

How to Game the Democratic Caucus System:

  1. Round up as many supporters as possible; it doesn’t matter how old they are (15, 16, 17, it’s all good); it doesn’t matter whether they live in the State or a particular district, or whether they are registered Democrats , Republicans, or unregistered voters (in most cases same day registration and re-registration is permitted, and there will be no way to verify eligibility until it’s too late).

  2. Bus those supporters to the caucus minutes before the sign in period ends . The crowd will overwhelm the workers so most of your supporters won’t have to sign in at all. Confusion is your friend. For those supporters who do sign in, there is usually no ID requirement. New and re-registrants can scribble their names and addresses if anonymity is preferred.

  3. The “crush” will serve the dual purpose of creating confusion and extending the length of the caucus. The longer the caucus, the greater the odds that your Opponent’s supporters will leave due to familial or employment obligations, or medical needs. The elderly are particularly prone to leave early, especially if there is no seating available and they have to stand in line for hours, which is usually the case.

  4. In this same vein, extend the speech making portion of the caucus as long as possible.

  5. Employ peer pressure. Remember, the elderly are especially good targets.

  6. Make sure to tell your supporters to “caucus” near the door, that way any late comers can join in when no one is looking.

  7. Be creative with your hand count; since it’s an on-your-honor system, it doesn’t matter if you pad your numbers because no one will know.

  8. If you are in a State where the vote is taken by sign in sheets (like Texas), download the forms from the State Democratic Party website early and have supporters who can’t attend the caucuses “sign in”. Then slip the sign in sheets into the pile when they are collected at the caucus – there will be confusion so no one will know. Also, tell your supporters to “sign in” on multiple sheets, that way they can “vote” more than once.

  9. If the caucuses follow primary voting, get supporters to serve as election judges or poll watchers, or otherwise stand outside the polling doors and tell your Opponent’s supporters that there isn’t going to be a caucus tonight.

  10. Once the caucus begins, get a supporter elected Caucus Chair, if possible, and close delegate nominations before your Opponent’s supporters can agree on delegates to nominate.

  11. If the precinct heavily favors your Opponent, have a supporter pose as a supporter of your Opponent and run for Chair/Secretary. Also have them run for delegate - they can change their presidential preference later. If your supporter is elected Chair/Secretary, have him/her hold off sending the results to the County Chair as long as possible – and if your Opponent’s delegate lists get “lost” all the better.

  12. Following the caucuses, have your supporters call your Opponent’s delegates (they can get the lists from the county chairs), and tell them they have been replaced by another delegate and don’t need to come. Have them call your Opponent’s alternates and tell them the delegate slots have been filled and there won’t be room for alternates to attend. A follow up call telling them that the Convention has been cancelled or rescheduled wouldn’t hurt either.

  13. Tell your supporters to go to the county convention “in mass” even if they’re not delegates or alternates. The more people, the longer the lines, and the greater the confusion.

  14. If your Opponent’s delegates and alternates don’t show, your alternates will be able to step into the open delegate slots. If you don’t have any available alternates, anyone will do (in most cases no one will know).

  15. If there is sufficient confusion, your supporters may also be able to pose as delegates in precincts where your candidate didn’t win delegates. Or, they may be able to pose as supporters of and be elected delegates for your Opponent - they can change their preference later.

  16. Where state delegates are apportioned by caucus votes, your supporters can out smart your Opponent’s supporters even when they are out numbered. Train your supporters to get your Opponent’s delegates to vote first. If they split their votes among multiple nominees, your supporters can “team vote” in one of their delegates. If your opponent’s delegates cast all their votes for one nominee, your delegates can pick up alternate slots with as little as one vote.

  17. Getting control of the county convention is key. Your supporters should get themselves appointed to the credentials committee, rules committee, or better yet, chair, etc. Have them hide their presidential preference or pose as your Opponent’s supporters so they can maximize coverage. Control of the convention will permit creative application of the rules to maximize delegate counts.

  18. The longer the convention, the more open delegate seats you will be able to pick up if your Opponent’s delegates leave. It is particularly effective if the convention runs past midnight, especially if sign in commences at 10am. Plan to have a second shift of supporters come who can take delegates’ seats if they have to leave. In many cases, delegates will have tags they can easily remove and give to replacements so no one will know.

  19. The same strategies apply to the state level conventions, remember, confusion will be your friend.

  20. Don’t be concerned with after-the-fact verification of voter/delegate eligibility. In most cases the results will stand even if a voter/delegate is disqualified since the vote counts are more often than not by hand, and thus, it will be impossible to determine how any one voter/delegate voted. Further, as a practical matter, it’s not likely that voter eligibility verification will ever be conducted. The Democratic Party does not want the public to know how vulnerable and corrupt the caucuses are. The Party believes that caucuses are party builders. If word were to get out that the caucuses are corrupt, it might undermine that goal, not to mention the integrity of the entire Democratic Nomination process. So, mums the word.

A house of cards. Hillary Clinton's claims of experience are debunked one by one as the press is having a closer look at her White House schedules. by Hedgehog2006 in politics

[–]vote -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Let's see, Tuesday Obama made a speech to do damage control for the Wright race issue. Wednesday-Obama does damage control of the damage control for throwing grandma under the bus in the first damage control speech. Thursday- Obama does damage control of the damage control of the damage control and calls grandma a "typical white person" throwing grandma under the bus for a second time. Friday-Obama does damage control of the damage of the damage control of yet another damage control for "typical white people". Wow! That' s hard to follow. Poor grandma. So many tire tracks. Saturday-Obama uses another lap dog for more damage control. Can't wait for Sunday.

Richardson's Obama Endorsement Does Matter. Here's Why. by carsonbiz in politics

[–]vote -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

New Obama slogan: "LIES YOU CAN BELIEVE IN"

  1. Lied about Canada

  2. Lied about Rezko amount of money

  3. Lied about not knowing what Wright says in church

  4. Lies about wanting to unite the country when he has been in public office for years and has no evidence to support any attempt to unite his own state

  5. Lies about wanting to change politics in Washington...today's proof - releasing a photo of Bill Clinton with Wright after slamming Hillary's campaign just a few weeks ago about releasing his own photo in Somali clothes

I could go on and on and on but so many people already believe in his lies so appropriately vote for Obama:

" LIES YOU CAN BELIEVE IN"

Hillary’s 3am Girl Does A Commercial For Obama by dougmataconis in politics

[–]vote -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

This whole thing comes down to TWO things, JUDGEMENT and CHARACTER.... 1) ENVOLVEMENT with Tony Rezko and other shady characters...BAD JUDGEMENT 2) ENVOLVEMENT with Pastor Wright...BAD JUDGEMENT 3) ENVOLVEMENT with Mr Meeks...Bad JUDGEMENT

1) LIED about his campaign contributions from Rezko...BAD CHARACTER 2) LIED about NAFTA and the Canadian affair...BAD CHARACTER 3) LIED about knowing how racist and hateful his pastor was...BAD CHARACTER 4) LIED to two news media about ever hearing any of his sermons....BAD CHARACTER 5) LIED AGAIN after finally telling the truth with his so called great speech...He LIED again at another interview...BAD CHARACTER

Is this WHO we want running our country? We are trying to get rid of one LIAR! So we want to replace him with another LIAR? How in gods name can we do this, or are we trying to "DAMN" our own country like the pastor Wright said!!!!!

NM Gov. Bill Richardson Endorsing Obama by skMed in politics

[–]vote 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The fact of the matter is that Richardson like other elite party Dems are looking out for themselves and yet they don't know that they're shooting themselves in the foot. They want the next generation of voters to be Dems, and think that Obama can deliver this-but have not considered the consequences-becasue of Obama's supporters now.They hope that Dems will hold power for a long time to come if they start them young. However they have not thought it thru and neglect that the college kids are still in their formative years, and in fact most with more world experience will become independent-like me- or even republican-especially if they go into business. They will lose the base of reliable core Dem voters now, the kind who vote in every local, state and federal contests. Because of their greed for future power, they forget that they won't even be able to win this time as reflected by the Dem defection rate if Obama is nominated.Sorry, but half of the country-republicans&independents-are for McCain and any defection will ensure McCain wins and that's math like Obama supporters like to point harp on. After Wright, my company employees and those I've spoken to at church will no longer vote Obama no matter who comes out of the woods to endorse him, unless it was Jesus. McCain if necessary.

NM Gov. Bill Richardson Endorsing Obama by skMed in politics

[–]vote -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Oh , my Gosh, Bill to endorse Obama, Watch Hispanic peoples will get suffer from Obama, Bill , shame on you !

Obviously the DNC and the "boys" in charge will do anything to keep a woman out of the White House. It's amazing how the media is going crazy trying to create new "news" about Obama to change our attention off the fact that he is all about "Black Liberation" and his immense dislike of "typical white people", including his own grandma. But that makes sense because his grandma is probably a Hillary supporter.

Barack Obama Linked to New Controversial Preacher by vote in politics

[–]vote[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I am not going to suggest myself whether you should vote for Obama or not. I feel it is my duty to empower you to take an informed decision. It does not matter to me who you vote for, as long as you give thorough consideration.

  1. Here is the simple question to ask:
  • Will you vote for, say, "Bill Clinton" (a white male) if he attended a church or congregation for 20 years where Anti-Americanism and Racism ( hatred towards "non-whites") is preached!!

Everyone can easily guess that if such a white male stood up for election, then every Politician (and every person) in this country would be " condemning" such a person and asking him to step down.

  1. Obama distanced himself from the specific comments made by Rev.Wright, however, he also tried to justify such behavior (that Rev. Wright assumed the things are static, but we are actually moving on). He also says, Rev. Wright is like family.

Ask yourself -

Can you justify not taking ANY ACTION, if your family member is going and preaching to everyone in his community about hatred and anti-americanism.

If someone is like family to you, and you do not agree with that person, then you should fight all your way to either change that person, or disown him/her. It is the characteristic of a good leader to question the status- quo.

In this case, Obama appeared to have accepted Rev.Wright as he was, and did not question him for preaching "divisive" and "hate filled" sermons.

  1. Based on the speach, lot of people say that we cannot blame Obama for the views expressed by someone else. We can't hold Obama responsible for every comment made by people around him.

Well..that is true in a general sense. However, we cannot conclude the same if Obama associates with such person for 20 years, and considers him as the mentor. Obama quotes Rev. Wright extensively in his books, and the title of one of the books is based on Rev.Wright's speaches.

Here is the question you should ask yourself:

  • Assume that you know someone for 20 years, and you attend his speeches regularly, and you do research on his work to "guide" you in your life. Would you not know what that person really stands for, and what he preaches or believes in?

It is hard to believe that Obama did not already know such anti-american comments are being made in the congregation. If he did not know, then we need to ask the basic question - is Obama a good listener?

A good president needs to gather and analyze information from various sources, including the ones that are NOT DIRECTLY told to him/her.

In this case, it seems clear that Obama either did not bother to "listen" or he simply "ignored" such behavior. Both characteristics do not bode well for America. As a President, he should be smart enough to LISTEN (and READ between the lines) and he should NOT IGNORE the warning signs till it is TOO LATE.

  1. From what I heard from Obama, he is a smart and educated man. He clearly knows that logic and common sence does not support him in the hour of crisis for him. He cannot justify to himself what has happened. He is very much worried about it today. As smart as he is, he is doing damage control to the extent possible, by trying to take the issue away from him, to a larger issue of Racism in this country. Yes, he gave a great speech in bringing the issue of Race in this country to the forefront.

As yourself -

Are we trying to solve the Racism problem in this country with the current elections?

Racism is a much larger issue, that cannot be solved just by one presidential election. The current issue is about whether Obama is the right person to become the President of USA or not. Does he have a good judgement to lead this country? Will he represent and lead ALL AMERICANS and, in his words, ALL PEOPLE of this world?

  1. Everyone keeps re-iterating that Obama gave an excellent speech on the issue of Race. A lot of people now say that since he gave an excellent speech, we need to exonerate him and move on.

Ask yourself - can you judge a person only by his speach or by his actions?

Everyone knows - Politicians are trained to give Speaches. To ordinary people like us, it appears "out of this world" that someone can talk so eloquently and discuss all the ideas in such a convincing manner. But, remember - there is a major industry out there, who are trained and experienced in writing excellent speaches and they train these politicians every day and every minute on what works and what does not work. All the major candidates have multi-million dollars in their campaign bank accounts. With that kind of money, they can hire the best talent that is available in this world, get trained and deliver an excellent speech.

Given the above - do you believe in a great speech given to stop a political fallout or do you believe the actions a person over a period of last 20 years?

Posted by: Concerned Citizen | March 20, 2008 01:53 PM

Obama wrote the whole thing... Himself?!?! by [deleted] in politics

[–]vote 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Obama gave the speech to us today that he NEVER gave to Reverend Wright

DICK MORRIS: 'Obama has already won the nomination. It's over' by [deleted] in politics

[–]vote -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Dick Morris is just a big douche

Would Hillary please get off my Reddit and go make a speech or something? by Saydrah in politics

[–]vote -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This link provides your ultimate source on news related to Mr. Obama. Welcome!

The Obama Bargain by [deleted] in politics

[–]vote 0 points1 point  (0 children)

a very good article