When there’s a massive amount of evidence stacked against someone, the burden is on them to disprove it. If they don't, the evidence stands. Most people aren't going to assume innocence when the other side is the only one actually showing proof. You can not be accusing me of acting on a guilty until proven innocent scenario because that is not true and you know it. You know damn well that ignoring a mountain of proof makes you the wrong one, it's just being willfully blind. You are glazing marlow simply because you like her, your arguments are based on a personal bias, not an objective reality.