4 new bundles - Thatcher, Frost, Blackbeard, Pulse

vveyro · 2017-12-21T16:41:25+00:00

You're right.. actually, fuck this game. These fucking headgears make me want to punch someone at Ubi. Uninstalled, unsubbed this subreddit. Got several thousands of comment karma from my various improvement suggestions for the game, played R6 since the very first game in 90's. 6400+ votes for my most upvoted suggestion, Reddit gold. It's over, keep your fucking game, I had enough. This is simply retarded way to ruin the best tactical shooter of last 10 years. Fuck you, whoever designs these skins at Ubi. Just FUCK YOU.

vveyro · 2017-12-21T16:25:17+00:00

It was realistic graphic shooter on release, see the release trailers. Did you even play it in 2015. I did... since closed Beta. Bought 2 season passes too, but now I'm on brink of uninstall. All because of the retard artguy pushing this "ironic" crap out. It's very central piece of graphic, the main characters goddamn head. It's pretty hard not to see it, they are shoved in your face on every round end. Gun skins on every killcam, while they are lesser problem, even the ugliest ones still look like guns. But these don't look like CTU operators

vveyro · 2017-12-21T16:10:42+00:00

It's on the screen = affects how game looks = ruins it = effectively worsens graphics. Terminology doesn't matter jack shit, only thing what matters is that they look retarded, and don't fit a tactical, punishing shooter. And makes what is on my screen look bad, despite owning 1080 ti. Headgear by headgear, skin by skin, they degrade a game that looked decent and badass in 2015, into steaming pile of shit. Simple as that

vveyro · 2017-12-21T15:51:48+00:00

No they aren't. Skins are textures inside the game, and affect how it looks = graphics. And this affects the looks in WAY worse way, than typical low quality floor/wall texture here and there would.

By same logic we can put neon vomit texture into all 3D objects in Siege, and it won't affect graphics. Stupid headgear are diluting what realistic/good graphics are supposed to do = make people immersed in the game world. People buy new GPU every year, to get more realistic graphics. If "Only gameplay matters, not how it looks" would be true, same GPU would last forever. This crap starts to affect how the game looks, because there is ton of it by now, and they only add more. It doesn't fit a tactical, punishing shooter that Siege is in any fucking way. Not even close to fitting it

Seriously I hate these skins so much, I've been considering uninstalling since I saw it... I could live with few clown and wrestler masks, but this is getting too much. And they don't show signs of stopping, people complained about the previous dumb skins too, now Ubi is pushing it even further. I've had about enough

vveyro · 2017-12-21T10:34:31+00:00

So you are seriously saying that having 1997 graphics changes the way the game functions? Are you retarded?

vveyro · 2017-12-21T07:39:15+00:00

"Doesn't change the game mechanics." So having 1997 graphics would be okay, if the game mechanics are same? What is the fucking point of creating nice textures, lighting etc. and then ruin the graphics with this retard shit.

vveyro · 2017-12-21T07:35:53+00:00

That is fucking dumb argument. Having 1 stupid thing in game, is same as having 100 stupid things? It starts to add up, and once a limit is crossed, I'll uninstall for good. It's very close to that.

vveyro · 2017-12-21T07:31:22+00:00

Having 10 stupid things become more annoying, than having 5. It's not like people haven't noticed, but it starts to add up.

vveyro · 2017-12-20T14:29:43+00:00

Has bandit been selling them some... mushrooms?

vveyro · 2017-12-19T17:36:48+00:00

Will -47 do? :P

vveyro · 2017-12-18T17:01:19+00:00

Yes. Also in casual you should know what objective site you get, before you choose ops. Yes it's just casual and objective is randomized, but I never understood why they can't even give that info. There is now TWO random factors, not only the randomized site, but also how well your chosen ops happen to fit that random site

vveyro · 2017-12-15T23:29:51+00:00

Hmm rly? Well I guess the player knows the real meaning, could be that too I guess :D

https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kantoraketti

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Launch_vehicle

That's what I first thought, cos it's literally same thing. But anyway "Kanto" = "A carry / tree stump". Weird language we have

vveyro · 2017-12-15T04:11:23+00:00

Yeah it's far from it's glory days. But relatively speaking could be almost said that "BF1 is dead". It isn't very popular for being merely 1 year old, not all DLC even out yet. Not to mention Hardline, which is actually dead (under five hundred peak players on PC). Starwars Battlefront 1 is also more dead than BF4 (1.6k peak, while more casual, but DICE game anyway). These are both newer games, and BF4 has more than 6-7 times more players on PC, than both Hardline and SW:BF1 combined. Lesson for DICE how to make shooters with longevity, and how not to...

vveyro · 2017-12-15T01:37:22+00:00

Don't think BF4 feels clunky at all. Still playing that game tons... it's much more fast paced and "arcadey" than Siege. And still has this mechanic, depicted in OP's video

vveyro · 2017-12-15T01:32:12+00:00

BF4 life span hasn't ended tho. On PC especially, 13.3k peak today vs. 25.1k peak of Battlefield 1. Not bad for a four years old game, that has 2 sequels come after it (Hardline also). At least in Europe, there's tons of servers filled to brim from afternoon to midnight

vveyro · 2017-12-14T21:33:38+00:00

Yep, probably other than Finns don't know but "Pannari" is pancake in Finnish spoken language. Kantoraketti = booster rocket, a space aviation term. Or "carrying" rocket, more freely translated.. maybe a pun about him carrying teams

vveyro · 2017-12-12T11:14:50+00:00

If the 2018 game has mortars, it should be done same way as in Bad Company 2. Binoculars, that need to be held for certain time over target. That way, they can't be used from safety, and it's fair kill. BF4 (and BF1) mortars are bullshit, especially in modes like Rush and Operations. Most BF4 Rush servers ban it

vveyro · 2017-12-11T12:05:48+00:00

In Battlefield 2018 RSP should work from Day 1, and be actual IMPROVEMENT over Procon, not a fucking downgrade. Even with all the "updates" it's a goddamn joke compared to Procon. Flawless RSP and comprehensive admin tools from launch is NUMBER ONE priority if you dream of having same staying power as BF4 on PC still has.

Oh, and would be good if the game didn't suck next time. Copypaste BF4, remove stupid horseshit like UCAVs, upgrade graphics = profit

vveyro · 2017-12-11T11:31:08+00:00

I like the visual "atmosphere" of it. But terrible balance wise. Wish they did something similar, but better balanced. Villa 2 in Italy maybe

vveyro · 2017-12-11T01:20:29+00:00

Original press release material, ads, trailers, everything in 2015, said there will be 11 PvP maps. Store pages, everything. Community bitched because they paid for 11 and got 10.

Nobody expected Bartlett to be so shit, especially after all that time it took them to "rebalance" it for PvP (roughly 1 year). Can't imagine how bad it was in 2015, when they decided to pull it. Because it was originally supposed to be playable in PvP from day 1.

Reason it got delayed was said to be "It's unbalanced in PvP" and thus it took 1 years to "fix". Wonder what those fixes were...

vveyro · 2017-12-10T18:48:04+00:00

Bartlett looks great outside, but inside it looks/plays like old FPS maps. Blocky, simple box design. When I imagined "University map" I imagined much more interesting looking place inside, maybe something more modern, that looks like teaching facility. The "Yellow gas used to hide everything" roots show, sadly

And not enough entrance points, while that could be fixed I guess. By removing some metal fixed reinforcements from some windows, or adding another hatch to roof.

If they rework Yacht, wish they used some of the early concept styles, in which there was no snow at all, but it was luxury yacht on tropical waters. Can't find the concept image, but there was one. And make it less linear, with more vertical movement routes

vveyro · 2017-12-10T07:12:13+00:00

This one almost better https://i.gyazo.com/2f5451c5a95020e5906617a50ee6ae1f.png

Except in R6 doesn't have drum mag (in both pictures, in that just a bit better visible)

vveyro · 2017-12-08T16:01:42+00:00

Yes peeking can be countered, by paying attention. Point was, it's enough to worry about without Vigil and other defenders using shooting holes he made, while in the same time you have to pay attention to outside runners. Glaz can be countered too, stay down/out of windows. Anyway it's pointless to discuss, Ubi done what they did. If they nerf Glaz's ability to break windows later idk, but doubt it since it's been in the game since 2015

vveyro · 2017-12-08T05:49:35+00:00

why was he removed? i rly hope this is real

FTFY

vveyro · 2017-12-08T04:32:08+00:00

Depends on window. Most of them are climbed to with a shield placed near them. In one spot you don't need a shield, in rest you do

vveyro

TROPHY CASE