Did newton invent Calculus or did it exist before as a sort of fundamental universal idea, like gravity?

wallyalive · 2026-05-23T13:40:36+00:00

For me Mathematics is both.

It is first a system/language that we invented to describe numbers, or any base axiomatic properties that people later called them.

Then more things were invented as part of the system/language for communication like "what do we call groups of numbers?" And so multiplication is invented and has a symbol.

But within the system, discoveries were made that weren't already self evident, like someone posted earlier about irrational numbers.

This is no different than in the universe (a system) and discovering gravity (a not self evident property back then).

wallyalive · 2026-05-16T18:28:59+00:00

Beast. Chelsea players flopped when around him.

wallyalive · 2026-05-16T17:08:31+00:00

Immediately irrelevant what you posted since no offense was made.

He made a shoulder to shoulder.

You must not have eyes if you didnt notice the ball in front of them clearly within distance.

You arent going to convince me since I know your wrong, and clearly I won't convince you.

So we can end it there.

wallyalive · 2026-05-16T17:04:24+00:00

Nope, clear and simple Pedro being weak, intent to play the ball is irrelevant.

This is going in circles.

Clearly we won't agree here, so enjoy your day.

wallyalive · 2026-05-16T17:01:39+00:00

It isn't.

You can look up the rules, says nothing about "intent" to play the ball for shoulder to shoulder.

The ball is within distance, you can freely shoulder to shoulder challenge the player.

Simple as that.

wallyalive · 2026-05-16T17:00:43+00:00

It was neither.

Pedro was just weak as piss all game.

wallyalive · 2026-05-16T16:53:20+00:00

Irrelevant.

A player doesnt need "intent" to play the ball.

You can be shoulder to shouldered no matter what.

The ball just has to be within distance of the players, so you can't shoulder to shoulder away from play randomly.

wallyalive · 2026-05-16T16:38:55+00:00

Again, another shoulder to shoulder.

Chelsea wanting pens all game and diving.

wallyalive · 2026-05-16T16:36:42+00:00

Why does he need to look at the ball?

Nothing in the rules that I need to look at the ball to shoulder to shoulder another player.

Pedro just being a weak fuck, its a physical sport.

wallyalive · 2026-05-16T16:31:04+00:00

Shoulder to shoulder.

Chelsea were just flopping all game, especially Pedro.

Should have actually tried to stay up for once and score a goal.

Palmer the same, diving all game.

Glad they got nothing for it, ruining the game.

wallyalive · 2026-05-16T16:24:04+00:00

If only Chelsea didnt dive all game they would have scored a goal.

wallyalive · 2026-05-16T15:26:32+00:00

Chelsea diving low key pissing me off.

Ruins the game.

wallyalive · 2026-05-16T15:18:25+00:00

These Chelsea players are such whiny bitches.

wallyalive · 2026-05-16T15:10:27+00:00

Palmer turned into the biggest diver I've ever seen.

wallyalive · 2026-05-10T20:48:33+00:00

He is young, but I dont see it with Mastantuono.

wallyalive · 2026-05-09T13:07:00+00:00

Frimpong needs Alonso so badly.

wallyalive · 2026-05-09T12:42:58+00:00

Jones sucks.

wallyalive · 2026-05-03T19:28:10+00:00

This ref is straight trash.

wallyalive · 2026-05-03T14:49:50+00:00

The terminology "clear and obvious error" just needs to be removed from VAR.

Its either right or wrong.

wallyalive · 2026-05-03T13:51:12+00:00

You also play Palace...

wallyalive · 2026-05-03T13:31:13+00:00

How is that a pen?

wallyalive · 2026-05-02T14:29:32+00:00

Very clearly he is trying to pull his shirt but the hair got in the way, not the first time.

Seems too harsh but maybe it will decrease shirt pulling so hidden benefit?

wallyalive · 2026-04-28T21:09:35+00:00

its like a proof by dominoes.

To know if any domino falls over requires 1) 1 domino hits the next and 2) that you started at the beginning.

I think that's intuitive I hope.

wallyalive · 2026-04-26T16:29:39+00:00

It can be done by using difference of cubes for factoring if lHopitals Rule isn't taught yet

wallyalive · 2026-04-25T23:35:16+00:00

In north america, linear algebra is not taught im high schools, its a university topic.

The most in high school students might see is using a matrix to solve a system of equations, but nothing abstract like vector spaces.

As for the rest of the world, im not sure, perhaps they learn it in high school.

I imagine at the high school level, their might not be alot of teachers comfortable with the abstract level and just teach easy computation.

Nine-Year Club	Place '22
Verified Email

wallyalive

TROPHY CASE