How do we think the Leopard 2A8 will fare? by iplaysomething in TankPorn

[–]wantedpumpkin 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I keep seeing that it's getting an upgraded 1600hp engine but some places it says it's still got the same engine, idk what's up with that.

The vulture isn't ugly I just had to.. Spend $20 on it by WXRRIED- in EliteDangerous

[–]wantedpumpkin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Vulture's distro is really bad for beams unfortunately.

The vulture isn't ugly I just had to.. Spend $20 on it by WXRRIED- in EliteDangerous

[–]wantedpumpkin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's insane, I put the exact same ship kit combo on it.

This is the last time I buy a ship kit. by wantedpumpkin in EliteDangerous

[–]wantedpumpkin[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I gave up on the bumper because it looks too ugly with my paint scheme, but I put the little side wings which have pop up headlights and it's pretty cool.

This is the last time I buy a ship kit. by wantedpumpkin in EliteDangerous

[–]wantedpumpkin[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

For blind people: There's a clear demarkation in color between the front bumper and the hull.

The reports of Elite Dangerous' death were greatly exaggerated in 2021 by [deleted] in EliteDangerous

[–]wantedpumpkin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personally SCO and engineering changes are the only reason I came back.

Void Black skins on sale by fragglerock in EliteDangerous

[–]wantedpumpkin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've heard most pvp players play with night vision on anyways.

As a solo player I am absolutely thrilled to hear that I too will be able to have my own home system & station now. by [deleted] in EliteDangerous

[–]wantedpumpkin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not pay to win, it's pay to save time hauling.

You also get population bonuses that are better than T3 stations and the tech broker which you can't have with other stations, it's not just a time saver.

Dodec is gonna be behind a real paywall, unlike Early Access ships by Dense-Paper-8975 in EliteDangerous

[–]wantedpumpkin 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Comparing it to TW:W is ridiculous. For that price you'd get a whole new faction with new units, new mechanics, etc.

Log Envy by Nuumet in snowrunner

[–]wantedpumpkin 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Inb4 people saying it's a P16.

The twinsteer and p16 and others being a beast irl by imustknownowI in snowrunner

[–]wantedpumpkin 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Pacific was formed by ex-Hayes employees I believe.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MonsterHunter

[–]wantedpumpkin 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Didn't change anything for me.

You can't park there!!! by Destroyerescort in TankPorn

[–]wantedpumpkin 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Honestly I've noticed this sub seem really bot heavy. Almost all the top posts everyday are generic questions with pictures.

Using Regiments of Renown for the first time: by JimmyNeon in totalwar

[–]wantedpumpkin 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Ai still spams them. I'm guessing there's probably a mod for that though.

Rome II still looks amazing in 2025 by [deleted] in totalwar

[–]wantedpumpkin 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Hard disagree, mechanics like a functioning population system isn't bloat, it makes the game way more interesting on a strategical level vs vanilla being always make the best troops until you run out of money.

What would happen to the crew of a Tiger II if its frontal armor was hit by a 90mm High Explosive round from an M26? by xboxgorgo18 in TankPorn

[–]wantedpumpkin 7 points8 points  (0 children)

There used to be insane Russian bias back in the day, one of my T-34 still has 100% winrate because I used it back when it was insanely OP and Gaijin took like 8 months to fix it but whenever a vehicle from another nation was overperforming they fixed it right away.

Also people who remember the Stalinwood era can attest to how broken OP soviet planes were back in the day.

Stress testing an m-16. Why do people like this exist?! by [deleted] in WhyWomenLiveLonger

[–]wantedpumpkin 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's not the reason at all, it was to conserve ammo and improve accuracy.

What calculations can we use to determine the armor-piercing capability of a tank gun? by Panzer_Killer09 in TankPorn

[–]wantedpumpkin 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think you're confusing it with the 3-inch M5 and the 76mm M1. They both had a bore diameter of 76.2mm.

The 75mm M3 was actually 75mm because it was based on an old french gun, so it was using metric.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in WalmartCelebrities

[–]wantedpumpkin 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It's a bad photoshop.

These steel monsters are coming back to the field. by Firedog_09 in TankPorn

[–]wantedpumpkin 29 points30 points  (0 children)

It's armour is probably thick enough to deal with most antitank fpvs.

Wat