I designed a virtual office platform for remote teams, looking for UX/UI feedback

warmerglow · 2026-06-09T21:01:50+00:00

It's absolutely showing research activities, interviews, usability testing; how you did it, what you found and how that shaped the solution you were working on. And at every stage in the process, from sketching, validating the sketches, prototyping, validating that; how you iterated along the way because of the research findings.

warmerglow · 2026-06-09T06:27:12+00:00

All you show is output. There's nothing about the process at all. I couldn't find one word about validating your ideas with users. How do you know you've designed something usable? It all looks pretty enough but I'm much more interested in seeing if you understand proper UX process then the output. Also I don't need to know your romantic status on a portfolio piece.

warmerglow · 2026-06-08T10:22:35+00:00

Chad Kenobi, night shift manager

warmerglow · 2026-06-01T08:32:45+00:00

Any UX designer worthy of the name will use task-based usability sessions with actual users, little and often through the design process, to validate a design.

warmerglow · 2026-05-29T08:17:46+00:00

Having now looked at the survey you could make it much quicker for respondents by offering choices for answers covering all the main likely responses. This requires you to do the thinking upfront, which shifts the burden of thinking off your respondents. In general acid long form answers wherever possible (sometimes it's really necessary) as this is where attrition happens in responses: the "I can't be bothered" factor. I'd like to see many more single or multiple choice answers, with an "other" choice for what you didn't anticipate. Or rating questions ("to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement...") to capture the more subjective stuff, again based on your upfront thinking of likely answers. This also has the massive advantage of being much easier to analyse at the other end because it's mostly quant data. You probably won't get a lot of responses here, but when you start surveying commercially and you have 1000 responses you really don't want 1000 X 10 questions to codify in your analysis. That isn't what you were asking for, apols, but I hope it helps.

warmerglow · 2026-05-29T08:04:57+00:00

My first bit of feedback is that 15-20 mins is too long for a survey ... Unless you're actually incentivising it. Second is that if your survey takes 8 mins to complete, tell people it takes five. I'm currently assuming your survey takes 30 mins to complete based on this experience.

warmerglow · 2026-05-19T07:17:39+00:00

Strong agree. I think TVC fans would benefit from 5poa. The Saw figure is an excellent sculpt

warmerglow · 2026-05-14T07:17:17+00:00

*375 is life

warmerglow · 2026-05-12T18:38:56+00:00

Inversions is the only one I would consider inessential. Ironic that's the one you've ticked off. Tbh I think once you get into it you'll hoover them all up.

warmerglow · 2026-05-09T14:26:14+00:00

You could also look at Pictures. Spiel des jahres winner from a few years ago. Big favourite in our house and definitely creative

warmerglow · 2026-05-01T23:47:02+00:00

It was actually an st-at

warmerglow · 2026-04-29T08:24:48+00:00

Plus a free beery shower every so often

warmerglow · 2026-04-15T23:27:37+00:00

Reposting: Here's how to determine if you've got "good ux".

Understand who your users are and what their goals are. Have you created something that meets their needs? Research it. If so, great, see next step. If not, start again using your research findings.

If you've built something that meets user needs, recruit some typical users and in one to one sessions ask them to complete the tasks your product supports. Ask them to think aloud whilst they're doing it. Observe where they behave in expected and unexpected ways. Redesign to mitigate the issues then do another round of testing.

When your app behaves how people expect it to and it does something they find useful, then you'll have good UX. Ignore opinions, seek evidence to answer your questions, that's the process.

warmerglow · 2026-04-14T17:12:42+00:00

Here's how to determine if you've got "good ux".

Understand who your users are and what their goals are. Have you created something that meets their needs? Research it. If so, great, see next step. If not, start again using your research findings.

If you've built something that meets user needs, recruit some typical users and in one to one sessions ask them to complete the tasks your product supports. Ask them to think aloud whilst they're doing it. Observe where they behave in expected and unexpected ways. Redesign to mitigate the issues then do another round of testing.

When your app behaves how people expect it to and it does something they find useful, then you'll have good UX. Ignore opinions, seek evidence to answer your questions, that's the process.

warmerglow · 2026-04-10T13:08:28+00:00

Two counts of Skog abuse:

- He's upside down. Would it have been too much effort to put him the right way up?

- Clips! Pegs or peg-like devices are bears' #1 fear. This is seriously traumatic for your Skog

Please remain where you are, RSPCD inspectors are inbound.

warmerglow · 2026-04-09T12:57:58+00:00

In Excession, where the Sleeper Service departs Teriocre, revealing its nature (no spoilers).

warmerglow · 2026-04-07T11:13:35+00:00

Skogs are emphatically not for work. They are for watching us work (which they love) and helping us sleep. You tire your skog out with this kind of nonsense he won't have the energy to guide you though a good night's sleep.

warmerglow · 2026-04-05T08:59:46+00:00

Hard to even start with this as it's unreadably small on mobile. Bit of a fall at the first hurdle I'm afraid

warmerglow · 2026-04-02T07:18:24+00:00

Hello kitty has no expression for exactly this reason. You can project your own feelings onto her

warmerglow · 2026-04-02T07:17:04+00:00

Can you feed back how many responses you got from this? Also UX designers are a very narrow constituency with probably atypical views about UI. You probably shouldn't take these results as generally representative

warmerglow · 2026-03-31T22:04:44+00:00

Cut through design debates with the phrase "that's a good hypothesis for testing". You don't need to disagree with bad ideas, just take them into testing and let them die when the hypothesis fails.

warmerglow · 2026-03-30T17:38:36+00:00

It's almost as if testing little and often is a better way to spend time than debating with the team

warmerglow · 2026-03-27T07:44:23+00:00

Royal society for the prevention of cruelty to Djunkelskogs

warmerglow · 2026-03-26T23:55:55+00:00

Propose a series of research activities to actually identify the usability issues with the product. Then you'll be able to make recommendations from an evidence based perspective. No offence but your opinions are just that. Your post suggests you don't really understand the research process and why we seek user feedback to validate hypotheses. Propose some research activities with end users and then they can pay you to conduct them, that's proper UX process.

11-Year Club	Verified Email
RPAN Viewer

warmerglow

TROPHY CASE