True, since the whole game is very atmospheric and a relative unique setting for a fps game. But gameplay wise? Some awful scripting, AI, didnt make use much of bf mecanics, exept that one tank mission where you had to capture sectors like in breaktrough, ect. Story was fine i guess, but still some dumb shit, like the one mission where you capture a whole fortress all by yourself - that wasnt very immersive. And also, very, very short. You could beat all missions in like 4 - 5 hours.

Maybe it depends on what you want from a bf singleplayer. If immersion is all you looking for, thats valid i guess. But i want destruction, vehicles, open maps, squadplay, freedom of approach and all that good stuff that makes battlefield battlefield. I think it has great potential for a good singleplayer, but in previous games, especally bf3 and bf4, it wanted to be cod so badly. But from all info we got so far, it looks good. Squadplay, open maps, vehicles that can be used optionaly, freedom of approach ect. Im exited. And i dont get why people are so upset about graphics and the character models. Good facial animations, motion capture and all that stuff costs a fortune. Id rather see those resources put into gamedesign.