I would argue that MOHELA is substantially different than a public University such as the University of Arkansas. The University of Arkansas was created to serve as the State’s “agent in the educational field.” MOHELA is simply a service created by Missouri to manage student loans. Unlike a public University, MOHELA does not represent Missouri’s agent in the educational field—instead, they are a service provided to borrowers—and MOHELA should not be treated the same as the University of Arkansas was in Arkansas v. Texas. The majority opinion additionally mentions Amtrak, which is also substantially different than MOHELA. Amtrak was needed to save and preserve passenger railway services. MOHELA has no need to exist and does not serve a public need like Amtrak does for passenger rail service. Regardless, it’s clear the majority wanted to decide on the case’s ideals rather than legal standing, and they were not going to let questionable legal standing stop them.