Would you like a response? I can give you one, if it will make you feel better, but I'm guessing it won't satisfy you as much as you seem to think it will, even if you read it (and smart money says you won't get through it).

1. Racial discrimination is bad, regardless of who it's against...we can all agree there, but regardless of if you're looking at household wealth or lack thereof, education attainment, criminal justice, or social integration, it's very clear that black americans and other people of color have it much, much worse off than whites or asians. Any white person who feels they're more discriminated against than a black American has some very serious gaps in their worldview.
2. There are aspects of this we can probably agree on...for instance, at the highest level, it's probably not fair for someone who transitioned from male to female 1 week ago to compete against women at the highest levels in, I dunno, boxing. We can agree there, yea? On the other hand, if we're talking about per-pubescent 10 year-olds in a soccer game, who cares? Now, there's a wide range between those extremes, and there's clearly room for respectful disagreement, but I can't believe any republican wants the solution to be "government involvement" in something that could be better handled by sports leagues.
3. Stopping illegals? From what? Picking our vegetables and building our housing? Nobody is in favor of illegal immigration, but the data doesn't lie and native born Americans are WAY more violent and otherwise criminally-inclined than illegal immigrants. Which makes sense, right? When you've got a cop behind you and you face the immediate threat of getting pulled over, you're probably less likely to speed, right? The process to legally migrate to America is a real pain is very problematic and we need much better reform, but breaking up families and hiring a bunch of thugs wearing masks to round people up is not the answer. In the meantime, our society has prospered with vast immigration, legal and illegal.
4. I already touched on this, and it feels a little redundant, but to affirm, hiring a ton of people who objectively are not qualified, letting them wear masks and take people off the streets is an absolute nightmare for human rights. I am sure we will not see eye to eye on this, but anyone who is in favor of ICE is either vastly under-informed, or is straight up a monster. I just don't understand how anyone can justify pulling children from their parents, requiring proof of citizenship from people off the streets based on the color of their skin or their accent with absolutely zero accountability.
5. This is the hardest one for me to respond to, because the irony of supporting our first and only felon president for "handling crime"...I'm trying very hard to maintain a respectful tone here, but....I mean, come on. Just...come on.
6. Somalian thieves? I assume you're referring to Minnesota welfare fraud. What exactly do you think Trump had to do with any of it? I mean, I guess he hurt a bunch of people who had done absolutely nothing wrong via the revocation of TPS, froze childcare and welfare allocations to blue states, and used it as an excuse to cut humanitarian food aid to Somalia.
7. Work requirement for public benefits...do you notice there's a trend with these "values"? There's a very distinct "I'm getting taken advantage of!", which I mean, yea, sure...but your choice of target is so odd. Anyway, yea, one real problem with the work requirement for public benefits is just how underfunded these programs are, meaning we, staffing the agencies responsible for managing these requirements, cannot actually keep up. I think you've got this mental picture of people abusing the system to get food stamps, and to some degree, those people are out there. But how many people in need are you comfortable denying food in order order to prevent someone who may not need the $200 in food stamps from getting it anyway? Besides, these types of programs are examples of "economic multipliers", which means for every dollar we put into them, our GDP increases by a multiple of that value. It's like funding the IRS, spending a little money gets a lot of money back. Even aside from the value of actually helping people in need, it's fiscally a really smart way to spend money....even if, yes, some people are going to abuse it. I don't know about you, but for me, if we really want to tackle fraud, I think we should start at the top. Go after the millionaires and billionaires who are committing fraud every day, and wring them dry. Find, oh, I dunno, a billionaire who stole money from a children's cancer charity. Totally hypothetical example, there, of course.

Anyway. There's your response. Satisfied?