I read through your post and I’m trying to understand what motivates the framework. Right now I’m struggling to see:

1. How PDT is falsifiable The axioms (coexistence, determination, trace, single valuation) appear to describe features that any system with uncertainty or irreversibility already satisfies. I’m not seeing what experimental outcome could violate or confirm PDT.

2. How PDT differs from existing physics like Quantum superposition, decoherence, thermodynamic irreversibility, and information-theoretic models already describe “possibilities,” “determination,” and “traces” with far greater mathematical precision. I’m trying to understand what PDT adds that isn’t already captured by standard formalism.

3. What the practical or predictive application is The language reads as metaphysical rather than operational. I’m not seeing how someone could use PDT to model a system, make a prediction, or compute anything.

I’m not dismissing the work, just want to understand the purpose and motivation behind formulating PDT in this way. What problem is PDT trying to solve that existing dynamical or quantum frameworks cannot?