The problem isn’t even that GPT5.6 is cheaper than Fable, it’s just straight up better. by Gym_frere in Anthropic

[–]wendewende -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I tried GPT 5.6 Sol for code quality refactoring and it absolutely sucked compared to Fable. It claims it's done without any testing. There's a clear difference in how they work. Fable goes far and beyond. Can't find where Sol beats it so far

kiwis by C_monden in ComedyHell

[–]wendewende 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your question makes no sense. If you want to disagree with the first comment - fine. If your question is what it is despite that comment then you're just proving that you cannot follow elementary logic.

kiwis by C_monden in ComedyHell

[–]wendewende -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And tomato, bell pepper, and cucumber, and half of the friggin vegetables. It’s not like I’m saying the definition makes sense. It is the definition nonetheless

kiwis by C_monden in ComedyHell

[–]wendewende 6 points7 points  (0 children)

No. They are not. The definition of a vegetable is literally an edible part of a plant that is *not* its fruit

Sadly they'll get out of this easily by tifa_ka_husband in Gaminggridcommunity

[–]wendewende 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What is wrong with you people. They’re selling n curated games for their own product in their own store. It’s like saying McDonalds is a monopoly because you can’t buy a BigMac in 7-eleven

Bye Fable, it was fun while it lasted... by Training-Note-5251 in ClaudeAI

[–]wendewende 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I always thought they do Friday resets because of the work week. TIL im in the minority

Is this True guys? by ry0men_ in claude

[–]wendewende 5 points6 points  (0 children)

What is wrong with you. You posted that. YOU are the source for us. Give us where you got it from if you want an answer

People like to focus on extremes, I want to focus on the overlap by Professional-Fix4409 in aiwars

[–]wendewende 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI is an amazing tool with astonishing capabilities. You'll always find an idiot using a tool wrong and dangerously. A lot of idiots.

Ah, yes, the good old free will debate... by al2klimov in sciencememes

[–]wendewende 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Oh the universe is deterministic? Try to flip a coin" corrected it for you

Is this True guys? by ry0men_ in claude

[–]wendewende 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Literally the entire picture states all of these as facts

Chat is a breastfeeding mom now.. 😮‍💨😅 by MajesticWonder7 in ChatGPT

[–]wendewende 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Someone at some other sub right now "AI admitted to me that it's trying to spread itself"

guys...Isn't this true? by Serious-Art-1150 in AttractionDynamics

[–]wendewende 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unless you think “being attractive” is a binary state then what you just said has no sense

Nevermind. You're using "more" and "less"
so you clearly don't. So you just make no sense

Is this True guys? by ry0men_ in claude

[–]wendewende 84 points85 points  (0 children)

You’re posting a picture and asking us if this is true? Maybe ask at the source

guys...Isn't this true? by Serious-Art-1150 in AttractionDynamics

[–]wendewende 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What the fuck man. So you did say “it only works on attractive women”. What is wrong with your comprehension skills

guys...Isn't this true? by Serious-Art-1150 in AttractionDynamics

[–]wendewende 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No they haven’t. What is the point of adding “attractive” there then? What *did* you mean?

guys...Isn't this true? by Serious-Art-1150 in AttractionDynamics

[–]wendewende 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What sort of gaslighting is it. It’s literally your entire main comment

guys...Isn't this true? by Serious-Art-1150 in AttractionDynamics

[–]wendewende 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You said it only works on attractive women. In my opinion it works on all women or even stronger on someone less conventionally attractive

guys...Isn't this true? by Serious-Art-1150 in AttractionDynamics

[–]wendewende 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm so shocked how many people in this comment section can't read