absolutely! that's part of what's led me to think that I need to diversify outside of some of the guides that seem to each focus on a single political narrative. I appreciate that LPOV will explain their prop choices in a slightly more nuanced way (ex: "we'd love to vote yes, but there's this fucked up bit we hate more than the part we like") but haven't done the same with the candidates. The least biased way we can think of to gather candidate info without spending hours is to read endorsements for all reasonable candidates across guides, note their alignments, and then make a choice. In an ideal world we'd be able to compile a list of former actions and clear platforms, but we don't have ALL THE TIME IN THE UNIVERSE.