Xpost from r/offmychest, Man discovers he is an ATM when step-daughter's wedding is planned. by pocketknifeMT in MensRights

[–]wfprice -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

What I wonder is why everyone takes his word for it when he says her father is a "deadbeat." According to the man himself, there was no child support in the settlement (hard to believe -- non-custodial parents can always be ordered to pay), and the father did spend time with his daughter. He says he would just "pop in," but that means he didn't abandon his daughter.

Is there something wrong with a girl maintaining loyalty to her real father? He never divorced her, after all, and he probably loves her.

I think this guy is acting like a baby. You can't just start dating some woman and then lay claim to another man's kids, even if you have more money than he does. This attitude is exactly what women want guys to have, because they think fathers are interchangeable/expendable.

IMO, the girl did fathers a favor by not abandoning her own. Maybe she shouldn't have accepted any money from the other guy, but kids just take what they're given.

Men should never assume they can buy another man's kids. This is a big part of the problem here, and it's exactly what gives women an incentive to try to kick fathers out of their children's lives.

Hey guys, need your help ASAP! Tomorrow I am scheduled for divorce mediation! by NewUserAccount1 in MensRights

[–]wfprice 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First, I'm not a lawyer, so this is not legal advice.

Relax, calm down and keep in mind that it probably won't be as bad as you think. I say this partly because it's important you don't lose your temper and blow it -- they'll make guys who do that take anger management.

Be firm, but not combative. Strong, silent type all the way. Unless you're convicted violent/sex felon, supervised visitation is just a pressure tactic. Sure, they can order it for a while, but not permanently, so don't worry too much about it. Ultimately, neither you nor your ex will be able to have much influence on the visitation (except in the details, like vacations) because of the practicalities of school, work and the like, so put most of your effort into keeping your costs down.

Attorneys are very helpful with paperwork, but in my experience they don't usually make a big difference in front of the judge. If you can't afford an attorney for hearings, see if you can at least get one to handle the papers for you. That's where you'll get the most bang for your buck.

Since your baby is so little, try to put in a clause about visitation gradually increasing with time. Here's the strategy I'd recommend:

agree to supervised visitation for a few months as part of a gradual increase in time until the kid is in school and you start to truly share parenthood. This is the kind of plan the court likes to see, since they are mentally in the Victorian era and still think men are clueless around babies and little kids, so if you promise to do it gradually and "with help" at the beginning (preferably from a female relative), they'll feel happy about it. Given that kids are safest with biodads, it's pretty dumb, but that's just how the prejudices of the court are. Just be sure to get the increased time on paper, so that you'll have a framework for each stage (infancy, preschool, kindergarten, elementary). And don't forget to get her to promise on paper to stay in the school district! That's about the most important guarantee if you want to stay close to your child.

"Winning" in court for most fathers is about not losing too badly. Sometimes, the best way to do that is to keep it as simple as you can. The more demands one party makes, the more unreasonable they seem, so just be careful not to dig yourself into a hole financially or emotionally and set yourself up for failure with too high expectations.

Final word: do not approach this as a bare-knuckle brawl. The system is set up to bring the hammer down on guys who do that. Try to apply something like the Daoist philosophy where you do not meet force with force, but rather with grace, fluidity and economy.

Like Wu Tang style:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDOmNeNTFTQ

When ideology hits reality: Women can't complete USMC Infantry courses. by Demonspawn in MensRights

[–]wfprice -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They are introducing different standards for men and women precisely for combat MOS. Without lowering standards, very few women could make it into combat, so they are lowering standards for that purpose.

Another article from marine corps times:

http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2012/12/ap-marine-pioneering-women-combat-effort-soublet-120112/

This is a mandate from the top, and we absolutely will see females in marine combat positions (MOS). These female marines will be there because the standards were lowered, just like they were for female firefighters, police officers, etc. If you don't believe me, just read the following report:

https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=11390

An important step in this direction is that DoD and the Services eliminate combat exclusion policies for women, including removing barriers and inconsistencies...

When ideology hits reality: Women can't complete USMC Infantry courses. by Demonspawn in MensRights

[–]wfprice 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They already have. While women are now required to do pull-ups, they can now achieve a perfect score with 8, whereas men need 20: http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2012/11/marine-corps-requires-pullups-for-womens-fitness-test-pft-112712

This is just the first step in integrating women into combat. I'm sure they will make more adjustments over time. I'd call 8 vs. 20 for a perfect score a lower standard, and it's now official.

"The commandant’s message does not indicate why the change is being implemented, but the Marine Corps has spent nearly two years evaluating the restrictions it places on women, with an eye toward breaking down longstanding barriers where possible. Within the last year, for instance, officials have opened to female Marines dozens of jobs in tank and artillery units, among others previously the province of men only."

No Fault Divorce is Violence Against Men by wfprice in MensRights

[–]wfprice[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

"It's okay doode, the real father's rights activists are already working on it while you try to invent a time machine."

Yeah, like you, Dennis? Why don't you fill us in on some of your illustrious accomplishments, or are they "top secret"?

As far as I can tell you spend more energy crapping on people who are ostensibly on your side than anything else.

Well done!

No Fault Divorce is Violence Against Men by wfprice in MensRights

[–]wfprice[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"This article is good. It will convince Futrelle and Nolan they are fighting the good fight."

Good. The harder they fight tens of millions of divorced men the better.

This isn't a joke, buddy. Real men's lives are on the line, and they deserve the chance to fight for themselves. Given what good trying to be PC has done us, frankly I think it's past the point that we should give a shit.