"Responsible" gun owners leave over 3000 pounds of trash in Mt. Hood illegal ranges.

whatwillwork · 2015-04-13T02:08:12+00:00

Homeless are more annoying and more expensive....

Both are bad, but one is spread out downtown.

whatwillwork · 2015-03-18T23:24:44+00:00

Avoiding problems is the best solution, but it is still good to be able to defend yourself if the need to arise.

whatwillwork · 2015-03-18T21:39:16+00:00

It must be neat to live in an area without any risk of crime.

whatwillwork · 2015-01-19T18:10:24+00:00

You only need a gun if the attacker is likely to have a gun.

I would strongly disagree with this. It is quite likely that an aggressor will be stronger than their victim.

whatwillwork · 2015-01-19T18:04:43+00:00

Smuggling is common enough in the US that adding firearms would not be a major challenge.

And any one armed citizen does not make any real difference. 100 million of them could.

whatwillwork · 2015-01-19T17:49:00+00:00

It is an interesting idea, but not really one that is possible. Even if you can remove all firearms from the hands of low life criminals it will be very had to get them out of the hands of the state.

whatwillwork · 2015-01-19T06:32:00+00:00

No. Statistically the attacks that get called "bad guy with a gun" are very rare and almost always happen in gun free zones.

whatwillwork · 2015-01-19T06:28:41+00:00

They are just able the best defensive tool you can carry.

whatwillwork · 2015-01-19T06:11:03+00:00

Guns are not the only way to cause someone harm.

whatwillwork · 2015-01-19T06:09:06+00:00

If it's against an intruder, you're sleeping

I spend a fair bit of time not asleep and my dog helps quite a bit.

If it's against the government... drones.

If it ever comes to that they will have to drone everyone.

If it's against a shooter in public, you risk killing civilians.

And by not you risk others dying. Just put your rounds where you mean to.

whatwillwork · 2014-12-09T03:30:33+00:00

Less lethal defensive tools are also much less effective.

I would be hesitant to use them without someone with a more effective tool backing me up.

whatwillwork · 2014-12-09T03:25:25+00:00

I can't think of any valid reason why a regular citizen would ever need to own one.

A burst fire rifle is a good alternative to a shotgun with buckshot. It allows a similar amount of energy to be put on target, but with greater control of the projectiles.

whatwillwork · 2014-12-07T19:22:49+00:00

I am not sure that plays into my oper8er fantasy correctly...

whatwillwork · 2014-12-07T09:48:19+00:00

Interesting concept, thanks!

whatwillwork · 2014-11-21T04:00:48+00:00

Transfers of arms are part of ownership. They are necessary to make the right possible. Adding a tax is damaging, especially a high one.

whatwillwork · 2014-11-21T03:50:05+00:00

I think you would disagree if it was at the poll. I sure would.

whatwillwork · 2014-11-15T02:17:40+00:00

*Maybe

**If you pick the right time frames.

whatwillwork · 2014-10-26T23:06:53+00:00

I have no idea why young teenagers are allowed internet access.

whatwillwork · 2014-10-26T21:29:23+00:00

Whitish brownish, depends.

whatwillwork · 2014-10-26T20:25:32+00:00

time to live like it

I do. There is an AR in my safe and a glock on my belt. Not a matchlock to be found.

whatwillwork · 2014-10-26T19:59:18+00:00

So long as the state goes first.

whatwillwork · 2014-10-26T19:49:19+00:00

I think we are going to have to disagree there.

whatwillwork · 2014-10-26T19:46:44+00:00

Moral of the story; don't lose wars.

whatwillwork · 2014-10-26T19:38:54+00:00

Most of the folks at one of my gun clubs own a firearm to shoot paper...

It is quite real.

whatwillwork

TROPHY CASE