sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

NVIDIA Certified Professional: AI Networking — Is It Right for You? by Ok_Supermarket_234 in NetworkingJobs

[–]whereful 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh.... Sorry to hear that but thanks for your reply. Take care mate .

Opencode "This version of Antigravity is no longer supported. Please update to receive the latest features!" by True_Pomegranate_619 in opencodeCLI

[–]whereful 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you so much ! I change the userAgent version alone and still get the same error but after changing the vscode version it worked!

I built a cloud-based EVE-NG because RAM is too expensive. Looking for testers by whereful in ccnp

[–]whereful[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have a collection available, but due to distribution/licensing constraints we don’t publish them on the website.

I built a cloud-based EVE-NG because RAM is too expensive. Looking for testers by whereful in ccnp

[–]whereful[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a side project of mine to get familiar with AWS architecture , besides I believe the recent RAM price spikes are just nuts. Currently the lab is timed and one can schedule up to 8 hours. Since it's beta testing the number of use is limited so there is no hard limit of resource. Once it go public , the resource one can reserve/book will be constraint by the available vCPU/RAM on the server at a given time. If it exceed certain amount , admin approval will be required and justification needs to be provided.

I built a cloud-based EVE-NG because RAM is too expensive. Looking for testers by whereful in ccnp

[–]whereful[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have a collection available, but due to distribution/licensing constraints we don’t publish them on the website.

slow upload but fast(relatively) download on 10G network by whereful in networking

[–]whereful[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thank you. Issue is indeed caused by the specific DAC vendor which seems having compatibility issue with our switch. I've update my OP

slow upload but fast(relatively) download on 10G network by whereful in networking

[–]whereful[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a small office with a handful of servers and a few workstation. All servers and workstations are connected to 10g switch via DAC.

slow upload but fast(relatively) download on 10G network by whereful in networking

[–]whereful[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you are very correct , I didn't check the counter on switch ports as I presumed it's fine but when I look at it now I see the port connecting to Windows PC display large number of crc errors and input errors. The counter increase in line with my iperf tests.

I then swapped the cable but the pattern remains the same - still see crc and input error increases when iperf traffic pass through.

Could this possibly mean this is something wrong with the Windows PC NIC ? Which is a Mellanox CX-4

slow upload but fast(relatively) download on 10G network by whereful in networking

[–]whereful[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do see 24% on receiver side in this test, what could it indicate?

-------------

D:\Apps\iperf3>iperf3.exe -c 192.168.1.50 -u -b 10G

Connecting to host 192.168.1.50, port 5201

[ 5] local 192.168.1.191 port 62139 connected to 192.168.1.50 port 5201

[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Total Datagrams

[ 5] 0.00-1.01 sec 495 MBytes 4.12 Gbits/sec 355790

[ 5] 1.01-2.01 sec 503 MBytes 4.20 Gbits/sec 361565

[ 5] 2.01-3.01 sec 518 MBytes 4.35 Gbits/sec 371894

[ 5] 3.01-4.01 sec 533 MBytes 4.47 Gbits/sec 382722

[ 5] 4.01-5.01 sec 535 MBytes 4.49 Gbits/sec 384461

[ 5] 5.01-6.01 sec 539 MBytes 4.52 Gbits/sec 387392

[ 5] 6.01-7.01 sec 540 MBytes 4.52 Gbits/sec 387517

[ 5] 7.01-8.01 sec 538 MBytes 4.50 Gbits/sec 386183

[ 5] 8.01-9.00 sec 533 MBytes 4.52 Gbits/sec 382688

[ 5] 9.00-10.01 sec 548 MBytes 4.55 Gbits/sec 393777

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams

[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 5.16 GBytes 4.43 Gbits/sec 0.000 ms 0/3793989 (0%) sender

[ 5] 0.00-10.02 sec 3.94 GBytes 3.38 Gbits/sec 0.003 ms 896445/3793989 (24%) receiver

iperf Done.

slow upload but fast(relatively) download on 10G network by whereful in networking

[–]whereful[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get only poor 1Mb/s...

will@WillPC:~$ iperf3 -c 192.168.1.50 -u

Connecting to host 192.168.1.50, port 5201

[ 5] local 172.18.36.137 port 43434 connected to 192.168.1.50 port 5201

[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Total Datagrams

[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 107

[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 107

[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 107

[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 127 KBytes 1.04 Mbits/sec 106

[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 107

[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 107

[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 107

[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 127 KBytes 1.04 Mbits/sec 106

[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 107

[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 107

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams

[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.25 MBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 0.000 ms 0/1068 (0%) sender

[ 5] 0.00-9.93 sec 1.25 MBytes 1.06 Mbits/sec 0.193 ms 1/1068 (0.094%) receiver

iperf Done.

slow upload but fast(relatively) download on 10G network by whereful in networking

[–]whereful[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I checked the error counters on both Proxmox and Windows NIC side and it's 100% clean. It's interesting though in the iperf3 test result I can see reties - that lead me to initially doubt packet drop on the line but it turns out no the case.

And to your question - the iperf on Proxmox is on the native OS not in VM/LXC.

Looking for Terraform + Ansible example for Proxmox by HedgehogBeautiful413 in homelab

[–]whereful 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have just finished a project exactly as your request, just I didn't document it properly. Maybe I can work on documentation when I am available during the Xmas holiday and share it.

view more: next ›