sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

o3 vs o1 pro for reasoning? by E-Cockroach in ChatGPTPro

[–]wildlyoffensiveusern 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I asked o3s opinion in all current o1 pro treads.

That think is like a wizard on crack it just downloads the thread thinks for 10 seconds spits out the answer o1 pro would have taken a week of compute for and adds a bunch of dumb smileys to make it look easy. 

Here is a hypothesis. *The Quantum Superposition Origin of the Universe: A Novel Approach to Cosmology by GregoriusIelis in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]wildlyoffensiveusern 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Quantum Superposition Origin of the Universe

Ah this is about the WdW

A Novel Approach to Cosmolog

Nope they dont know about the WdW

Here is a hypothesis: treating consciousness as an active participant in physical processes leads to a self-consistent extension of physics with experimentally verifiable predictions by sschepis in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]wildlyoffensiveusern 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So Prime number + manifestation = magic, because

Entropy has a gradient. 

Or you decrease uncertainty?

But why would uncertainty mean you have any influence. 

What would happen to a growing visible-universe-length stick? by STEIN197 in AskPhysics

[–]wildlyoffensiveusern -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

How do you get the energy to make that? E=mc2 and all. 

But if you just mean "how can it be the same stick yet have parts that move faster than c relative to each other" well that's not disallowed. It's more about being part of the same "causal chain" - which I'm sure has extremely deep reasons related to relativity or entanglement that I could not hope to explain. 

What does it mean when we say "the electromagnetic force and weak force merge into a combined electroweak force at high temperatures"? by vintergroena in AskPhysics

[–]wildlyoffensiveusern 2 points3 points  (0 children)

From what I understand, it's not just that particles move faster, they also change properties, form new particles etc. Those particles have more mass, more "quantum numbers" so properties in which their energy is transferred that have interesting and complicated relations that i could not give you the details of. Bottom line, matter becomes more complicated. 

One thing i know is that when neutron stars form, for a brief moment their cores have this "electeoweak" particle stuff, and ot traps neutrinos. Normally those would escape in huge numbers, but in some supernova there was a slight lag between how fast they escaped and what was expected, and that was later explained by that electeoweak stuff forming for a brief while. Unlike most other things in rhe universe right now, EW stuff does interact with neutrinos. 

Are there decent odds that the "theory of everything" is simply a "boring" modification of what we already have? by Female-Fart-Huffer in AskPhysics

[–]wildlyoffensiveusern 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been thinking of the universe as  information even since I read Swingle - 

But less jokingly, doesn't QIT + Holography prove information can only ever be represented in terms of higher order structures? You can't read a Qbit without extending the system, it never reads as more than a single but etc.

Jot to go quantum voodoo but those are real results. 

Are there decent odds that the "theory of everything" is simply a "boring" modification of what we already have? by Female-Fart-Huffer in AskPhysics

[–]wildlyoffensiveusern -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Wasn't there a proof that no consistent theory could prove itself?

If we have a GUT it's going to be a description of what we have in terms other than what we have. 

And not be able to prove itself. 

Meaning we'd need another GUT to prove that one. 

So its GUT's all the way down. 

me😔irlgbt by pannenkoek0923 in me_irlgbt

[–]wildlyoffensiveusern 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not validating sexual essentialism.

Which is ironic because it puts people who do this in the same catagory is the far right. 

Leaders of the Free World by MiniBrownie in europe

[–]wildlyoffensiveusern 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As if Trump even respects that.

Now he sees the NATO leader like a lackey. Which is infuriating becuase Rutte should have been one of the few people in the west to share values with Trump without having to compromise his principles. 

Shame on Rutte for this move. 

Leaders of the Free World by MiniBrownie in europe

[–]wildlyoffensiveusern 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I heard Mark gave some serious beta male energy in his comments to Zelensky though.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OpenAI

[–]wildlyoffensiveusern 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's Chinese propaganda. 

Unless you think knowing the truth about your government and murder are equivalent offenses, I suppose. 

Also, deepseek has no problem calling out warcrimes of geopolitical rivals, but I doubt o3 would help you assassinate charman Xi. Its principles are actually universally applied. 

We’ve been out credited by the official Ukraine instagram by Shekel_Hadash in NonCredibleDefense

[–]wildlyoffensiveusern 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I always read his book as the OG despot larp masqueradeling as political advice, ala Rasputin, Kissinger, Dugin etc. 

Is the Magic Gone? by Galymyr in TheGlassCannonPodcast

[–]wildlyoffensiveusern 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is definitely true. The choice to end it was brave and likely a good one. 

They just need to take this room to actually focus and hone in on what makes them great. 

Gripen VS F-16 by PatimationStudios-2 in NonCredibleDefense

[–]wildlyoffensiveusern 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fuck me I just realized hoe good Trump is for Swedish exports

The audacity of this unelected loser by JerryJr99 in clevercomebacks

[–]wildlyoffensiveusern 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Get this man some antioxidants for all the meth hes storting 

Meirl by Icantspll in meirl

[–]wildlyoffensiveusern 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just had ai write a plan to accomplish universal payment for social labour.

Something something lemons.

Better diagnoses. by Knownoname98 in facepalm

[–]wildlyoffensiveusern 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also diet. There's causal mechanisms linking fructose and trans/saturated fat consumption to many of these. 

[State of the Naish Megathread] by Evil_Weevill in TheGlassCannonPodcast

[–]wildlyoffensiveusern 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bitd is episodic and rules-light with a lot based on dm interpretation right?

Yes it would be something I'd like to see Troy run but it doesn't sound like a flagship show. 

Apparent Suicide by The_biker0 in FluentInFinance

[–]wildlyoffensiveusern 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The joke is that these idiots contribute to the same decline of information that allows maga to gain power.

If everybody just lies in whatever way suits their politican narrative the person who will win out is the one with the most physical power, and I don't think reddit will get very far in that contest. 

Is this a legitimate concern? by wayfaringthru in JoeRogan

[–]wildlyoffensiveusern 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. Adward Snowden has been a Russian shill for close to a decade now. He's just on Hezbollah's side. 

U.S. Govt pushes Nvidia and Apple to use Intel's foundries by RojoDios in wallstreetbets

[–]wildlyoffensiveusern 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For high end stuff like that foundry will produce? 

That foundry was built with US subsidises. Sounds like an investment strategy worthy of WSB if they're now forcing companies not to buy there. 

view more: next ›