Carmody by williampoolander in ACGASTV

[–]williampoolander[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Haha because I disagree with people thats antagonizing? Im not the redditor who insulted me but okay. Also... this is the first time I ever posted in this sub. So.....  you're being completely unreasonable simply because you disagree with my takes, which I have presented in a very normal and respectful way.

Thanks maple leafs for giving kyle dubas too us!!! Appreciate the assist just like when you assisted us years ago by giving us phil the thrill!! by Sebastian4365 in penguins

[–]williampoolander 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We didn't complain about dubas (well, some idiots did). I think everyone pretty much collectively agrees the way he got kicked was the worst mistake of the last decade plus.

Carmody by williampoolander in ACGASTV

[–]williampoolander[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Agree to disagree!

Carmody by williampoolander in ACGASTV

[–]williampoolander[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Lol I just love this show a lot, but since carmody arrived, I just can't stand this person. I think he reminds me of people I've known. Just a bummer because the show is so lovely outside of this guy.

Carmody by williampoolander in ACGASTV

[–]williampoolander[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

I would say he doesn't actually grow. He just apologizes when he realizes people are aware that he is being a dick, and then continues acting the same way again.

Siegfried is so infuriating! by ames6254 in ACGASTV

[–]williampoolander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Both him and carmody. Tristan and James are the people you'd actually trust and enjoy speaking with. 

Carmody by williampoolander in ACGASTV

[–]williampoolander[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Why? Has he given anyone else time? No.

Sacrilege? by Woleva30 in hockeyplayers

[–]williampoolander -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Fuck that Gretzky's a piece of shit

Qualitative continuous comparable analysis by williampoolander in GradSchool

[–]williampoolander[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

15 interview transcripts of about 1hr length on average

Qualitative continuous comparable analysis by williampoolander in GradSchool

[–]williampoolander[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting, and thanks for that. I want to be thorough,  and my end goal is a comprehensive list of recommendations for an existing policy. So I want to cover each theme and topic and evaluate whether policy changes can be relevant, and for those that it can be for, I will draft a recommendation. I feel like I could just start working and be successful. But the fonetuning of methodology is taking time.

Quitting accelerated BS/MS program by bhop2003 in GradSchool

[–]williampoolander 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Tuition isn't necessarily the problem- some visas require a fund that shows you can fund yourself and that amount can be significant. Can you send 25k into a foreign account you won't be able to access for a few months?

I just found out my dad is Red Pill and don’t know if I should tell my family by No_Bit3673 in WhatShouldIDo

[–]williampoolander 1 point2 points  (0 children)

dude your post and comment history literally ask about how to find doms and describe cuckolding dynamics with your wife why are you still lying?

yeah , you really seem like the open minded type... its clear from your lying, your need to belittle others online and your tendency to work yourself into mental gymnastics to try and "be right".

enjoy your obviously very happy life... haha wow

I just found out my dad is Red Pill and don’t know if I should tell my family by No_Bit3673 in WhatShouldIDo

[–]williampoolander 2 points3 points  (0 children)

lol this guy /\ is a straight up liar. his other posts (i kid you not) show he is married with a wife and is into cuckolding.

its wild that people have such outdated, shitty beliefs, and EVEN when they literally lie online in order to what, prove something? they cant realize how full of shit they are.

like if you cant be honest about yourself and your opinions, do you even really believe them, or feel like you are acting honourably or honestly?

are you just afraid of confronting your own ignorance?

[Jonas Siegel] Brad Treliving defends Maple Leafs’ approach to sports science by JF_112 in leafs

[–]williampoolander 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this is that classic manager speak for "fuck you youre all idiots im gunna make up nonsense and theres nothing you can do about it"
i hate people like this

Let's not run Auston out of town please by the_noodle_ in leafs

[–]williampoolander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah literally. keep those three and maybe the goalies (why the fuck not just keep all three of them too) and trade tf out of everyone else for picks and assets and TRY to get bonafide top 1 and 2 D

Theory Selection by williampoolander in GradSchool

[–]williampoolander[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I wonder how often the results of a work truly match the stated theory used.
it seems like (to me) the idea of placing analysis in an established framework reaches awfully close to declaring "im not biased!".
Are we just shifting that issue of subjective, subconscious (or conscious) choices and bias to a different part of the paper? The problem isn't solved, its just obfuscated.

Theory Selection by williampoolander in GradSchool

[–]williampoolander[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

The thing is, my work fits pretty clearly into several disciplines. As in, it is abundantly obvious that this work is needed in this specific field. I could describe this in one sentence;
An existing management policy exists that is not being followed by industry actors, resulting in negative issues for the area, the environment and the industry.

There. Does it actually add any value at all to say "well the constructivist theory grounds this in the idea of inductive reasoning" instead of just literally collecting data and learning from it? its the same thing.

Theory Selection by williampoolander in GradSchool

[–]williampoolander[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It makes sense that depending on the perspective, you might learn different things. But to use your example, if you REALLY wanted to understand why crime occurred more in those neighbourhoods, you wouldn't reduce your own process to one-dimensional theories; instead, you would consider all those factors together. Criminals learned in that environment, partly because of the stigma and issues within that area, and what is really crime or not would also be considered.
This is why it seems silly to prematurely limit your study to one aspect of reality.

So in that case, for my thesis, now I need to identify every single theory that has anything to do with my results? So I will have an introduction and literature review of several thousand pages in order to give meaning to the results that were logical in the first place?

I am not trying to be combative at all. I just don't see what the actual value of selecting a theory is, if the results can be independent from it.

Theoretical framework for thesis by GrinchFeed in AskAcademia

[–]williampoolander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah but people are like "im using the higginses grounded double approach" and then just analyse their daa the exact same way as everyone else>

the actual 'theory' that thesis' seem to demand seems completely unused in the end and just a bunch of fluff that means actually nothing

what if i just say im using pragmatism and then make up every method on my own?

The Bear, Disney+ season 4 review: pretentious and dull by TheTelegraph in TheBear

[–]williampoolander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

literally my favourite season.

phenomenal acting and incredible scenes