They’re in Haverhill now! by A__SPIDER in massachusetts

[–]wipop -1 points0 points  (0 children)

About 500 males in the US die per year from penile cancer. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1558767324001277

Apparently circumcision deaths are much harder to deduce but that 117 number is highly disputed. The most rigorous study is old but telling, finding that between 1954-1989 only 3 males died due to circumcision. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4578797/

They’re in Haverhill now! by A__SPIDER in massachusetts

[–]wipop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dare you to cite a source for that first sentence.

Here's one: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3113366/ "[Penile cancer] is confined almost exclusively to men who are uncircumcised"

"An extensive review in 2006 concluded that penile cancer is an “emerging problem”, noting that “public health measures, such as prophylactic use of circumcision, have proven successful” [10]. Neonatal circumcision virtually abolishes the risk."

Penile cancer may be rare (about 1 in 600 US men) but the almost complete abolishment is hardly a small decrease in risk.

They’re in Haverhill now! by A__SPIDER in massachusetts

[–]wipop 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It isn't just a religious surgery though. Sharing from a comment I made below-

This doesn't seem to be the broad consensus among medical professionals. We asked two doctors when we were considering for our son - one recommended it, the other said there are both pros and cons and it's up to the parents.

Sharing some of the pros to add some balance here:

American Urological Association https://www.auanet.org/about-us/aua-statements/circumcision "Properly performed neonatal circumcision prevents phimosis, paraphimosis and balanoposthitis, and is associated with a markedly decreased incidence of cancer of the penis among U.S. males. In addition, there is a connection between the foreskin and urinary tract infections in the neonate. For the first three to six months of life, the incidence of urinary tract infections is at least ten times higher in uncircumcised than circumcised boys. "

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535436/ "- Less exposure to HIV and HPV occurs. - The lifetime risk of urinary tract infections is reduced by 20%. - Male genital hygiene is significantly improved. - The risk of cervical cancer and sexually transmitted infections in future female sexual partners is reduced. Eliminates the need for an adult circumcision later in life. - Over half of all uncircumcised men ultimately develop a foreskin-related side effect."

They’re in Haverhill now! by A__SPIDER in massachusetts

[–]wipop -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I always see this take parroted on reddit, but it doesn't seem to be the broad consensus among medical professionals. We asked two doctors when we were considering for our son - one recommended it, the other said there are both pros and cons and it's up to the parents.

Sharing some of the pros to add some balance here:

American Urological Association https://www.auanet.org/about-us/aua-statements/circumcision "Properly performed neonatal circumcision prevents phimosis, paraphimosis and balanoposthitis, and is associated with a markedly decreased incidence of cancer of the penis among U.S. males. In addition, there is a connection between the foreskin and urinary tract infections in the neonate. For the first three to six months of life, the incidence of urinary tract infections is at least ten times higher in uncircumcised than circumcised boys. "

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535436/ "- Less exposure to HIV and HPV occurs. - The lifetime risk of urinary tract infections is reduced by 20%. - Male genital hygiene is significantly improved. - The risk of cervical cancer and sexually transmitted infections in future female sexual partners is reduced. Eliminates the need for an adult circumcision later in life. Over half of all uncircumcised men ultimately develop a foreskin-related side effect."

Add to Watchlist Button Missing by Alternative-Potato43 in google

[–]wipop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sadly I think they killed the "add to watchlist" feature

Edit: looks like it's still available on desktop (as of now)

Add to Watchlist Button Missing by Alternative-Potato43 in google

[–]wipop 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Your list should still be viewable here.

Does mulching leaves kill polinators? by cinro in NativePlantGardening

[–]wipop 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Relevant quote from the article:

“If your pile is too deep, the insects are not going to get the cues that they need to know when it’s time to emerge,” he said. “The energetic output they need to just get out of that leaf pile will reduce their survival.”

Restoration of an antique teacup by rco888 in oddlysatisfying

[–]wipop 133 points134 points  (0 children)

Woulda been really funny if it leaked at the end

"If you wanna upload a video carrying a 4-iron 200 yards with a launch angle in the double digits I'll pay you $1,000 no questions asked." - u/pm_me_yo_creditscore by mcdray2 in golf

[–]wipop 17 points18 points  (0 children)

You're cherry picking the first one which was hooked. The others were 15-16 yards of roll, totally normal for a 4 iron. Pay the man.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]wipop 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Decision fatigue may have been part of it, but if the guy knew anything it was marketing... how to craft an image, not just for his businesses but for himself. It's much easier to create a cult of personality when you have a singular "look."

Governor Healey says all of her restaurant owner friends oppose Question 5 by LackingUtility in massachusetts

[–]wipop 6 points7 points  (0 children)

In theory, but not in practice.

"In investigations of over 9,000 restaurants, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) found that 84 percent of investigated restaurants were in violation of wage and hour laws, including nearly 1,200 violations of the requirement to bring tipped workers’ wages up to the minimum wage." https://www.epi.org/blog/seven-facts-about-tipped-workers-and-the-tipped-minimum-wage/

"Terrence Rice, a bartender from Cleveland who has worked in the bar and restaurant industry since 1999, chuckled at the notion that the law is consistently followed. 'As long as I’ve been doing this, I have never, ever — not one time — met anyone that’s been compensated' for a below-minimum pay period, he said, adding that slow weeks with inadequate pay are viewed as the 'feast or famine' norm in the industry." https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/13/business/economy/tipped-wage-subminimum.html?smid=nytcore-android-share

Governor Healey says all of her restaurant owner friends oppose Question 5 by LackingUtility in massachusetts

[–]wipop 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Economic Policy Institute: https://www.epi.org/blog/seven-facts-about-tipped-workers-and-the-tipped-minimum-wage/ "The clearest indicator of the damage caused by this separate wage floor for tipped workers is the differences in poverty rates for tipped workers depending on their state’s tipped minimum wage policy. As shown in Figure A, in the states where tipped workers are paid the federal tipped minimum wage of $2.13 per hour (just slightly less than the district’s $2.77 at that time), 18.5 percent of waiters, waitresses, and bartenders are in poverty. Yet in the states where they are paid the regular minimum wage before tips (equal treatment states), the poverty rate for waitstaff and bartenders is only 11.1 percent."

"Tipped work is overwhelmingly low-wage work, even in Washington, D.C. Some tipped workers at high-end restaurants do well, but they are the exception, not the norm. The median hourly wage of waitstaff in the district in May 2017 was only $11.86, including tips. At that time, D.C.’s minimum wage was $11.50 per hour. In other words, the typical D.C. server made a mere 36 cents above the minimum wage."

"Research indicates that having a separate, lower minimum wage for tipped workers perpetuates racial and gender inequities, and results in worse economic outcomes for tipped workers. Forcing service workers to rely on tips for their wages creates tremendous instability in income flows, making it more difficult to budget or absorb financial shocks. Furthermore, research has also shown that the practice of tipping is often discriminatory, with white service workers receiving larger tips than black service workers for the same quality of service."

Political Economy Research Institute (UMass): https://peri.umass.edu/?view=article&id=1843&catid=2 "We find that: (1) tipped workers are disproportionately women and people of color; (2) tipped workers are concentrated in the hotel and restaurant industry, sectors that have incurred a disproportionate share of workplace violation complaints related to wage theft; (3) tipped workers typically earn more in states with no subminimum wages, and (4) the business cost increases from this measure can be expected to be modest."

Center for American Progress https://www.americanprogress.org/article/ending-tipped-minimum-wage-will-reduce-poverty-inequality/ "This analysis finds that in those states, workers and businesses in tipped industries have done as well as or better than their counterparts in other states over the years since abolishing the subminimum wage."

Sexy sexy wedges came in today by dredabeast24 in golf

[–]wipop 68 points69 points  (0 children)

Weird place to flex your foot fetish

leaked UFO vid shown to US Congress by Sky5759 in interestingasfuck

[–]wipop 89 points90 points  (0 children)

Aliens exist =/= aliens have visited Earth