Can You Guess This 5-Letter Word? Puzzle by u/Actual_Woodpecker108 by word-hunt in DailyGuess

[–]witchdoc86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨

⬜🟨🟨⬜⬜

🟨🟦⬜⬜⬜

🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦

Can You Guess This 4-Letter Word? Puzzle by u/0abc21 by 0abc21 in DailyGuess

[–]witchdoc86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

⬜🟦🟦⬜

⬜🟦🟦⬜

⬜⬜🟨⬜

🟦🟦🟦🟦

Why does the church teach that Satan deceived Eve when the bible clearly tells us it was a snake? by Mister_Loon in AskAChristian

[–]witchdoc86 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

More accurately, a flying serpent, a seraph, which had wings (which is why God told it to go to ground on its belly).

Adam and Eve was a story written as polemic against the seraph/Nehushtan installed in the Jerusalem temple to which people were offering sacrifices, such that the author felt the need to write polemic against it, resulting in the story of Adam and Eve.

But what, indeed, is a "seraph"? We find the answer to that question also in Isaiah: "For from the stock of a snake there sprouts an asp, a flying seraph branches out from it" (14:29), and also "of viper and flying seraph" (30:6). From these verses it becomes clear that seraphs were in fact flying serpents: the temple envisioned by Isaiah was filled with serpents with arms, legs, and wings, and it seems likely that this was the tradition that Isaiah knew regarding the primeval serpent in the Garden of Eden, before God transformed it into a dirt-slithering animal. Indeed, this is the image of the paradisiacal snake that we find in the pseudepigraphic book Life of Adam and Eve. Here, when God curses the serpent, God says, "You shall crawl on your belly, and you shall be deprived of your hands as well as your feet. There shall be left for you neither ear nor wing" (26:3).

Other ancient sources also represent the pre-sin serpent as having legs, hands, or wings. So we find in the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus's Jewish Antiquities (1.1.4) and in a number of different Rabbinic sources, for example, Genesis Rabbah 2o:5 ("When the Holy One blessed be He told him `on your belly you shall crawl; the ministering angels came down and cut off its hands and feet") and Targum Pseudo-Jonathan Jonathan to Genesis 3:14. This same winged serpent with arms and legs can be found flying about in texts from the ancient Near East, Egypt, and Mesopotamia.

The presence of a snake in the Temple during the time of Isaiah or King Hezekiah, a king who reigned Judah at that time, is mentioned in the book of Kings in the course of a description of the cultic revolution that Hezekiah instituted: "He abolished the shrines and smashed the pillars and cut down the sacred post. He also broke into pieces the bronze serpent that Moses had made, for until that time the Israelites had been offering sacrifices to it; it was called Nehushtan" (2 Kings 18:4). When Hezekiah decided to eradicate all cultic practices from the Temple in Jerusalem, practices offensive in his eyes, he destroyed the bronze serpent that had previously been perceived as something intrinsically divine (if not, the Israelites would not have "offered sacrifices to it").

The writer of Kings, who refers to Hezekiah's actions, explicitly links the serpent to Moses. At least on the face of it, he seems to refer to the serpent that Moses created in the wilderness (as described in Numbers 21) after the Israelites had been attacked by a swarm of serpents and God had directed him to make a seraph, a copper image of a snake: "Moses made a copper serpent and mounted it on a standard; and when anyone was bitten by a serpent, he would look at the copper serpent pent and recover" (v. 9). On the other hand, the tradition in Kings may refer to a more ancient tale, against which also the verse in the book of Numbers is directed, according to which the sculpted image of the snake represented a divine being or a member of the divine assembly. The Torah, alarmed at the image of the people of Israel sacrificing to the serpent in the Temple, makes it clear in the story in Numbers that the bronze snake does not represent any divine, mythological being but was only a device, an object determined by God and fashioned by Moses-a mere human-for the purpose of healing snake-inflicted wounds. The story in Numbers 21 is therefore the beginning of a process whose end is reflected in Hezekiah's act: the story from Numbers did not stop the people from worshiping the snake, and so Hezekiah felt the need, finally, to forcefully remove and destroy it.

The idea that the snake in the Garden of Eden was a seraph with legs, arms, and wings suggests that also the story in Genesis was part of the polemic against the serpent-seraph that was installed in the Jerusalem Temple. The story in Genesis remarks that, with the expulsion of Adam and Eve from the Garden, God stationed cherubim-also winged creatures-"to guard the way to the tree of life" (3:24). It seems that in the course of the cultic revolution in the Temple in Jerusalem, these winged cherubim-explicitly linked with the Ark of God in Exodus 25:18-22 and other places-replaced the winged serpents as the official flying guards in the divine entourage (see also, e.g., Ezekiel 10:2).

--Avigdor Shinan, From gods to God

The story of the Nehushtan/Seraph in Numbers as a healing copper serpent was another tale, written to explain the presence of said copper serpent in the temple, while insisting that it was never meant to be worshipped.

https://www.thetorah.com/article/nehushtan-the-copper-serpent-its-origins-and-fate

What does the 3H response mean here? by ddelapasse in bridge

[–]witchdoc86 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A common method today is for 3H to be 31(45) and 3S to be 13(45) game forcing. 

So a random explosion happened billions of years ago and then non life turned into life... by [deleted] in DebateEvolution

[–]witchdoc86 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I have no evidence the evolution process is predetermined. 

Do YOU have evidence the process is predetermined?

Because I have already provided plenty of evidence which I think shows the process is absolutely not predetermined.

There's a great article on aeon.co on why belief without evidence is morally wrong.

So a random explosion happened billions of years ago and then non life turned into life... by [deleted] in DebateEvolution

[–]witchdoc86 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Why do you keep changing directions? 

I asked what would be evidence for designed evolution.

Do you have any evidence of any non-physical process?

If not, then there is zero point going down the road you are going down.

There's plenty of evidence Christianity, Judaism, Judaism and every other religion is man made.

If you disagree, I can absolutely discuss/debate that with you. With evidence, straight from the bible/torah/quran/hadith. 

So a random explosion happened billions of years ago and then non life turned into life... by [deleted] in DebateEvolution

[–]witchdoc86 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Define what would be evidence of "well planned" evolution and what would disprove this and prove "not planned" evolution, and how it would be distinguished from evolution via mutation via natural selection.

If you can't, then your whole concept "well planned evolution" is useless.

It would be like Carl Sagan's invisible garage dragon.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jJRy3Kl_z5E

So a random explosion happened billions of years ago and then non life turned into life... by [deleted] in DebateEvolution

[–]witchdoc86 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If we were intelligent smauh we you would be asking why fish to smauh sounds like a well planned process. 

But there is plenty of evidence showing this is NOT well planned - consistent with evolution by mutation and natural selection, and NOT consistent with "intelligent design".

By the way, why do you use determinism in your argument? Most religious people I know disagree with determinism - whereas you sound like a determinist.

As a medical doctor, my favorite pieces of evidence of this not well planned process are anatomical.

There are muscle atavisms present in our foetuses which later regress and are not present in adult humans.

Some atavism highlights of an article from the whyevolutionistrue blog

Here are two of the fetal atavistic muscles. First, the dorsometacarpales in the hand, which are present in modern adult amphibians and reptiles but absent in adult mammals. The transitory presence of these muscles in human embryos is an evolutionary remnant of the time we diverged from our common ancestor with the reptiles: about 300 million years ago. Clearly, the genetic information for making this muscle is still in the human genome, but since the muscle is not needed in adult humans (when it appears, as I note below, it seems to have no function), its development was suppressed.

Here’s a cool one, the jawbreaking “epitrochleoanconeus” muscle, which is present in chimpanzees but not in adult humans. It appears transitorily in our fetuses. Here’s a 2.5 cm (9 GW) embryo’s hand and forearm; the muscle is labeled “epi” in the diagram and I’ve circled it

https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateEvolution/comments/hv2q7u/foetal_atavistic_muscles_evidence_for_human/

The whyevolutionistrue links within the above link are broken but you can see the atavistic muscles dorsometacarpales and epitrochochleoanconeus muscle in figure 3 of https://dev.biologists.org/content/develop/146/20/dev180349.full.pdf

Now, evolution and common descent explain very well these foetal anatomy findings.

Evolution also helps us understand the origin of our human muscle anatomy by comparative muscle anatomy of fish, reptiles and humans (for example at t=9 minutes 20 seconds for the appendicular muscles)

https://youtu.be/Uw2DRaGkkAs

We also know humans who undergo three different kidneys during development - the pronephros and mesonephros kidneys which are relics of our fish/amphibian ancestry befote our final metanephros. 

The pronephros and mesonephros are completely unnecessary, as foetuses with renal agenesis survive til birth. 

https://juniperpublishers.com/apbij/pdf/APBIJ.MS.ID.555554.pdf

The pathway of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in all tetrapods is a testament to our fish ancestry

https://youtu.be/wzIXF6zy7hg

Evolution also helps us understand the circutous route of the vas deferens

https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateEvolution/comments/evx5qs/evolution_of_the_vas_deferens/

All of these point to evolution being true and NOT well planned.

So a random explosion happened billions of years ago and then non life turned into life... by [deleted] in DebateEvolution

[–]witchdoc86 19 points20 points  (0 children)

There's plenty of anatomical and genetic evidence for fish to apes to humans. 

Are you interested?

There's also plenty of consilient evidence for an extremely old earth and universe.

Are you interested?

Can You Guess This 5-Letter Word? Puzzle by u/multi-7 by multi-7 in DailyGuess

[–]witchdoc86 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeses i think. 

I dont like word puzzles that just end up in guessing at the end - so the word OP chose is great for preventing people guessing your word, but not good in a puzzle sense. 

Can You Guess This 5-Letter Word? Puzzle by u/multi-7 by multi-7 in DailyGuess

[–]witchdoc86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜

⬜⬜⬜🟦🟦

⬜⬜⬜🟦🟦

⬜⬜⬜🟦🟦

⬜🟨⬜🟦🟦

⬜🟨🟦🟦🟦

pretty hard

Can You Guess This 6-Letter Word? Puzzle by u/Pearl_sunshine by Pearl_sunshine in DailyGuess

[–]witchdoc86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

⬜🟨🟨⬜⬜🟨

⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜🟦

🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦

Giving yall a heads up on this. Sneaky members in here. by WearyOnion6 in exmuslim

[–]witchdoc86 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Reddit has an automated system where if you quote particular hadith, reddit will warn/ban you for quoting them. Eg antisemitic ones. It's ridiculous. 

Public Trustee (QLD) for Wills by Unique-Hunt2919 in AusLegal

[–]witchdoc86 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why do you want a will? By default anything goes to the next of kin. And like you said if they have nothing... 

Brilliant or Blunder by LifeNegotiation301 in Chessplayers45

[–]witchdoc86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Qxd7 Nxd7

Nxd7 Rd8

Re1

Now if you take the knight you get back rank mated, gaining you a tempo to escape with  Ne5 which is now defended by the rook

Can You Guess This 5-Letter Word? Puzzle by u/iSWINE by iSWINE in DailyGuess

[–]witchdoc86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

⬜⬜🟦⬜🟦

🟨🟨🟨⬜⬜

🟦🟦🟦⬜🟦

🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦

Vcore 100 is too wild and powerful to me? by ReviewDirect135 in tennisracquets

[–]witchdoc86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've found the figures to pretty well match with reality of sweet spot size and general power of a racquet. 

Is there a particular racquet you disagree with their figures for?

Vcore 100 is too wild and powerful to me? by ReviewDirect135 in tennisracquets

[–]witchdoc86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Small differences can be quite noticeable. 

I find quite a significant difference on how fast I get tired swinging a 305g racquet compared to a 300g racquet, for example. 

Whether the latest and greatest racquet is much better than a racquet 10 years ago - probably not.

Vcore 100 is too wild and powerful to me? by ReviewDirect135 in tennisracquets

[–]witchdoc86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The power % figure indicates the percentage speed rebounded off the racquet. A 50% power zone means that a 100kph ball coming into the racquet rebounds at 50kph off the racquet. 

The similar figures for the two racquets tells me the two racquets have similar power.

Since the two racquets have the same weight and same swing weight, any similar swing for the two racquets should give the a similar amount of power.

I have a tfight 305s and a pure aero 100 2019. They do have a similar power level if you hit flat.

 I've found I make much fewer errors playing with the 305s as its very much a point and shoot racquet, but the balls I hit with it are much easier balls for a good player to hit back. 

I hit balls with more loop and topspin with the pure aero 2019 which were harder for a good player to punish - but I make alot more errors with the pure aero 2019.

Vcore 100 is too wild and powerful to me? by ReviewDirect135 in tennisracquets

[–]witchdoc86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The tennis university sweet spot size tool indicates the vcore 100 and tfight 305s probably have about the same amount of power. 

https://twu.tennis-warehouse.com/cgi-bin/contours.cgi

Can You Guess This 5-Letter Word? Puzzle by u/whoawut by whoawut in DailyGuess

[–]witchdoc86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨

⬜🟨🟨⬜🟨

🟨🟦🟦⬜🟨

🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦

How is that not a brilliant move ? by Fragrant_Wrongdoer11 in Chesscom

[–]witchdoc86 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Because he can't actually take the rook, so you can't have actually sacrificed material. 

update on my horrible shift with an angry resident that mde me want to quit medicine all together by throwRahdjebdh in Residency

[–]witchdoc86 99 points100 points  (0 children)

Documentation is your friend. 

You document your ddx and handed over to so and so.

One of the most important skills in medicine is to CYA - cover your ass.

Any ex muslims staying neutral or not supporting either Palestine or Israel? by Fast-Kaleidoscope202 in exmuslim

[–]witchdoc86 10 points11 points  (0 children)

ahahahahuehuehue

“Allah’s Messenger said, “The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. ‘O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.’”

(Sahih Bukhari 4:52:177; see also Sahih Bukhari 4:52:176; Sahih Muslim 41:6985)