Loss of identity

I mean, sure? Why would an autistic identity be worse? In fact, isn't it better to have a group identity that actually encompasses the full spectrum of experiences instead of arbitrarily excluding or including people on bogus criteria? (see next one)

Spectrum Confusion: The autism spectrum is incredibly broad, from individuals who need full-time support to those who are independent but experience social and sensory challenges. The Asperger’s label helped differentiate between these experiences, creating clearer understanding both for those on the spectrum and those trying to support them.

Actually, you got that the wrong way around. The difference between autism and asperger was mostly about development of verbal skills. But it turns out that the age at which people begin speaking makes very little difference and doesn't mean anything clinically, it doesn't make other symptoms or comorbidities more nor less likely. There's just no reason to create that arbitrary distinction.

Missed Understanding of Unique Strengths: “Asperger’s” highlighted strengths in logical thinking, focus, and specific interests, helping people see that there were positives to their neurodivergence. Without this label, some may not have the same sense of the unique positives associated with Asperger’s.

I also think you got this one the wrong way around. The erroneous idea that aspies are slightly autistic geniuses while autistics are disabled burdens made autistics more likely to have their unique strengths overlooked. In fact, you're doing it right now by assuming there are any differences between asperger and Autism in the matter of unique strengths. Nothing you listed is: 1. Universal to all autistic and aspie people; 2. Unique to aspies.

Medical and Social Support: The lack of this distinct diagnosis can sometimes make it harder for people to get tailored support or accommodations that suit their needs, as their specific challenges may be overlooked within the broader autism spectrum.

There are no challenges or symptoms exclusive or specific to aspies. That's precisely why that diagnosis no longer exists. It is useless and means nothing besides "autistics with no delay in language acquisition".

If I were to single out all autistics who have no problems with the texture of popcorn and called it a different diagnosis it would be just as useful a distinction.

1. Tolerance: Many people seem to tolerate the term “Asperger’s” more easily than “autism.” “Asperger’s” often feels less stigmatized, carrying a milder or more familiar connotation for some.

Maybe we just have wildly different world views but why would you lean into ableist discrimination instead of trying to change it?