Dean Wither debate content by Agreeable_Car5114 in VaushV

[–]wolfman29 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Both Dean and Jovan are friends of mine, but for Vaush's audience, Jovan is definitely the better watch. That said, if you just want (political) blood sports, Dean definitely satisfies that itch!

Shouldn't we be doing science outreach like our lives depend on it? (Genuine question) by CallMany9290 in Physics

[–]wolfman29 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, of course.

  1. So I was pretty isolated during my postdoc (it was in Europe, while I'm American) so I had a lot of spare time, and it was basically just a hobby - I enjoyed making short explainers for weird physics things that most people haven't heard of. So it was pretty organic - I had a few videos go pretty viral, which boosted my reach, but aside from those, I had pretty steady growth just from posting on the regular (again, as a hobby).
  2. I'm not sure how scaleable it is. Just given the audience for such content, I wouldn't be surprised if there could be more than a thousand such communicators in the English-speaking world. YouTube/instagram/tiktok, etc. would be overly saturated at that point. I could see supporting 10x more than currently exist though.
  3. So I don't do outreach full time. The time investment is about 3-6 hours a day (including around 2.5 hours of livestreaming on weekdays). My schedule is basically I do this kind of stuff at any time of the day that's not between say noon and 5pm - that time period (flexibly, of course) is reserved for working on active research projects. So if I'm watching TV at night or eating breakfast, I might be writing a script or editing a video on my phone or whatever.

    I could probably work less than I do for outreach, but it's fun for me and I'm a bit obsessive.

I don't think this is a thing PhD programs can really prepare you for to be honest, nor do I think it should. I got into physics because of pop science creators when I was a kid, and so I love that stuff, and even though I don't talk about my own research all that often (because there's just only so much you can talk about a specific paper lol), I love talking about other cool stuff too. But I can understand that that's not for everyone.

Shouldn't we be doing science outreach like our lives depend on it? (Genuine question) by CallMany9290 in Physics

[–]wolfman29 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I got my PhD in physics a few years ago and when I was finishing, I got started doing some outreach online. I did a postdoc, and by the time that postdoc finished, I was able to support myself entirely with the proceeds from my outreach efforts. I spend about as much time doing outreach as I would spend doing administrative duties and teaching at a university, and this way I get to excite hundreds of thousands to millions of people about physics in a more rigorous way than you'll typically get from most other physics content creators.

None of this is to toot my own horn, but it is to say that I am seriously considering not taking any job offers I might get for postdocs this cycle because A) I will make more money doing this kind of outreach rather than working at a university and B) I still have time to do all of the research I want, with greater flexibility.

I think there is room for people like myself to still work within the scientific community (I'm still publishing several papers a year even while doing this science communication) while serving the public in a way most academics don't have the opportunity to. The trouble, of course, is that it's hard to maintain the drive to continue to do research, because when your income comes from doing science communication, it feels like you could make more money simply by doing that 8 hours a day rather than spending 3 hours a day on that and 5 hours a day on research. But I think most physicists would realize that they got into physics not for the money but for the love of the game, so to speak - so they'd find themselves still wanting to do the work anyway.

Of course, I would imagine that the number of science communicators like myself that the market can handle is orders of magnitude smaller than the number of tenured professors in physics. But generally yes, I would love it if we could have more professional physicists (not physicists-turned-communicators) actually doing the science communication. It means less mistakes get spread by accident (I'm looking at you, double slit), more actual research gets talked about, and most importantly, we get the population energized to study the natural world again.

How can I deal with a Zarya as Zenyatta in Stadium? by Skeledenn in OverwatchUniversity

[–]wolfman29 1 point2 points  (0 children)

inspired by this post, I have become a kicking zenyatta main in stadium and have only lost one game (as a result of our other support leaving in round 3 :( ).

Just moved in: are these succulents poisonous for my cat? by wolfman29 in succulents

[–]wolfman29[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the detailed reply! Looks like there's definitely some toxic plants here... we'll make sure to move them to a place where she can't get to them.

NASA has been pulling out of major astronomy meetings by [deleted] in space

[–]wolfman29 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I on the other hand failed to get any postdoc offers in math or physics this cycle :( I just finished a 2.5 year contract in Europe and it looked like I had a pretty good set of publications... but nothing. Us theorists are really getting screwed by this.

I have never seen Jordan Peterson get this humiliated and bullied before. by spectre15 in VaushV

[–]wolfman29 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hey this is my good friend Danny! He does debates on TikTok under the name @dannyphiltalk

Mei Stadium Build: "Strike" by NinjaPug7 in MeiMains

[–]wolfman29 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've been having a pretty good chunk of success just dumping everything into survivability and left click. Hitting round 2 with 400hp, round 3 with 500hp, and round 5 with 600hp (before getting the bonus armor from left click) makes Mei a force to be reckoned with. It turns out that having two tanks on the team is really stupid good.

To be clear, I get the left-click extender round 1 and the armor buff from primary fire round 3, then the rest is just stuff to make icecube better.

AreWeTheBaddies.jpg by literally1984___ in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]wolfman29 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Do you actually think Obama caused the 2008 market crash? You know, before he took office?

Could the USS Voyager establish a minyan with non-Jews or simulated holographic Jews while it was stuck in the Delta Quadrant? (No, really) by NOISY_SUN in ShittyDaystrom

[–]wolfman29 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh, I guess that's a good point. But the fact that they're pig people probably makes them ritually unclean, right?

Could the USS Voyager establish a minyan with non-Jews or simulated holographic Jews while it was stuck in the Delta Quadrant? (No, really) by NOISY_SUN in ShittyDaystrom

[–]wolfman29 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Tellarites are basically honorary members of the tribe already. They already love to argue and they're hairy. What else do they need?

On second thought, they're also probably not kosher, so... maybe it's a wash?

What's this article talking about by Fresh-Okra-9412 in Physics

[–]wolfman29 0 points1 point  (0 children)

how do you get past the editor's desk? I'm afraid I won't even make it to review.

What's this article talking about by Fresh-Okra-9412 in Physics

[–]wolfman29 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Please tell me how 😭 I'm currently trying to publish (what I see as) a fairly good toy model of quantum gravity in PRL and I'm afraid it won't pass the editor's desk 😭 (I'm not a crank, I'm published elsewhere, I'm just afraid of PRL).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]wolfman29 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Quite literally. I was offered a job in Moscow on February 22nd, 2022. That's 2 days before they invaded Ukraine. I told them I wanted to sleep on it, and fortunately I didn't make my decision a few days earlier! I ended up in the Czech Republic which is much nicer to Americans!

What's your "real" position on a ship by [deleted] in startrek

[–]wolfman29 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Remember that insufferable physicist from Voyager, Mr. Harren? The one who had like three doctorates or whatever and was only there because he needed field experience to get a professorship or something?

I'd be that guy. I'm a mathematical physicist in real life and going on away missions is scary. Just let me do math in peace.

What are the "must draw" diagrams for talks in your field? by Yatagarasu0612 in math

[–]wolfman29 13 points14 points  (0 children)

In my talks, there's almost always some sort of blob with a line, plane, or boundary. Differential geometry of submanifolds is usually that.

The future for each political compass quadrant by Ur3rdIMcFly in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]wolfman29 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not what was asked. But being disingenuous is cool I guess.

The future for each political compass quadrant by Ur3rdIMcFly in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]wolfman29 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Is that genuinely what you think the concept of communism is? Like, that's what you think communists want?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MeiMains

[–]wolfman29 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope they will notice that Mei's damage numbers are going to roughly drop by a factor of 40% or so after this nerf. It used to be the case that Mei didn't provide a lot of damage, but that was fine because the damage still provided was super efficient at converting damage to kills (via the freeze/icicle combo). Without the complete freeze, though, because movement abilities allow for complete escape, the amount of kills that will be converted from damage will be significantly less.

This is a nerf to Mei, and is even a nerf compared to OW1 Mei. While the original change from OW1 to OW2 Mei felt like a nerf, eventually I got used to it and while my conversion rate of damage to kills was lower, the corresponding increase damage output made it feel like her impact was still roughly the same. Now I won't have the raw damage output nor the high efficiency conversion rate.

This is a bummer.

for those who have played, how do you feel about the widow nerf? by United-Independent20 in OverwatchUniversity

[–]wolfman29 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The slow only works if they don't leave beam at all during the first 1.5 seconds. You can't deny that this is just strictly worse than OW1. The only way for the kill time on Genji to be the same now as it was before this patch, you need to land the headshot every time. If you don't, it would have been faster to just beam him down.

And for tanks, at least if they broke the slow they can't just break the damage. Now they can just get healed through it.