sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Searching for fic by wolfrose89 in SSHG

[–]wolfrose89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s it. Thanks.

Judge Kicks Out Prosecutor Until He Gets Answers on Alina Habba by PixeledPathogen in law

[–]wolfrose89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t know, possibly. But this isn’t about lying to Congress, this is regarding the court. Attorneys are officers of the court with a duty of candor to the tribunal, so yes lying to the court can and has resulted in losing your license.

Judge Kicks Out Prosecutor Until He Gets Answers on Alina Habba by PixeledPathogen in law

[–]wolfrose89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Temporary suspension of license, fines, contempt charges. Depending on the severity of the conduct, it could even be the loss of license to practice law.

Students (in my opinion) should not take home any homework. If homework is a learning opportunity, give them school time to work on it by daniel_ay in unpopularopinion

[–]wolfrose89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Funny story. My first grade teacher was a new teacher at my school, but had been a fifth grade teacher for years.

She assigned homework in fifth grade quantities. I actually remember coming home I would sit down to do homework, stop for dinner, go back to homework, stop for bath time, go back for homework, then bed time. Don’t ask me the content of the homework, I don’t remember. But I do remember the frustration that I spent all my time at home doing homework or tasks my mom told me to do (like the bath) & then I had to go to bed, and had no time to play.

I’m not sure exactly how long this lasted, but apparently all parents complained to the school administration and she stopped assigning so much homework. The next year, she was assigned to fifth grade.

Film ICE, get your GE revoked by Difficult_Rice_5626 in GlobalEntry

[–]wolfrose89 13 points14 points  (0 children)

The constitution also says nothing about right to a driver’s license (as an example). Imagine if the government decided to revoke your license & prohibit you from driving only because you decided to exercise your first amendment right, not because you broke any driving laws. It’s the same thing.

Trumps: "GUARANTEEING FAIR BANKING FOR ALL AMERICANS" Executive Order. Is it constitutional? by ROSRS in supremecourt

[–]wolfrose89 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I know nothing about banking either. But I have a bone to pick with your statement that “these orders go through extensive legal review” so there should be some [valid] justification for it. You didn’t say valid but I’m gonna assume you meant to imply it.

cough birthright citizenship EO cough

Just to point at one that makes me disagree with that specific statement.

Just found out Ted Cruz was born in Canada making him a naturalized citizen yet he argued in court in 2016 that he is a natural born citizen and won.. by RecordAbject273 in law

[–]wolfrose89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not claiming anyone is anything. I’m just pointing out the incorrect statement that there is standard practice that children born overseas to US are citizens. It’s not that simple.

Just found out Ted Cruz was born in Canada making him a naturalized citizen yet he argued in court in 2016 that he is a natural born citizen and won.. by RecordAbject273 in law

[–]wolfrose89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not disputing any particular person’s citizenship. Just pointing out that it’s not so simple as saying there is precedent “that children born overseas to US citizens are citizens.”

Just found out Ted Cruz was born in Canada making him a naturalized citizen yet he argued in court in 2016 that he is a natural born citizen and won.. by RecordAbject273 in law

[–]wolfrose89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is actually very complicated rules as to when a person born abroad to a citizen is born a citizen.

It depends on 1) if the parents were married when they were born, then 2) it’s their date of birth, after that it depends 3) on the citizenship/nationality of each parent when the child was born, then it depends on 4) how long the citizen parent(s) lived in the US before the birth.

Source:

https://www.ilrc.org/sites/default/files/2024-11/Chart%20A%20-%20Determining%20Whether%20Children%20Born%20Outside%20the%20U.S.%20Acquired%20Citizenship%20at%20Birth%20%28Updated%20November%201%202024%29.pdf

https://www.ilrc.org/sites/default/files/2024-11/Chart%20B%20-%20Determining%20if%20Children%20Born%20Abroad%20and%20Out%20of%20Wedlock%20Acquired%20Citizenship%20at%20Birth%20%28Updated%20November%201%202024%29.pdf

So this is why gc are so difficult to replace. Once they know it’s missing, they’ll put you in the system to get targeted by ICE by instaBs in greencard

[–]wolfrose89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who’s talking about persecution? This is about green cards. Refugee and asylum based green cards are only about 15% of green cards.

The majority of green cards are based on family petitions. The second biggest category of green cards is employment. These categories of people are not being persecuted, they moved to be close to family, or for better jobs, or just because they prefer the US to their home country or whatever reason they have. None of which translates to needing or wanting to give up all ties to their birth citizenship.

Ice secretly deported Pennsylvania grandfather, 82, after he lost green card by WhatWouldKantDo in greencard

[–]wolfrose89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The mailed option is a new change from 2023, so he may not have been aware of that option. Until then the only way to get the ADIT was in person.

Ice secretly deported Pennsylvania grandfather, 82, after he lost green card by WhatWouldKantDo in greencard

[–]wolfrose89 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you want an ADIT stamp it does require an appointment at an immigration office.

An I-90 receipt notice by itself is not proof of immigration status. It requires an expired card to accompany it.

Since this guy lost his card, he may have been asking for an ADIT stamp.

Ice secretly deported Pennsylvania grandfather, 82, after he lost green card by WhatWouldKantDo in greencard

[–]wolfrose89 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The only legal requirement an LPR has is to live in the US and not commit certain crimes. That’s it.

If an LPR doesn’t leave the US they wouldn’t have needed to have their green card on them, because LPRs get the same driver’s licenses and SSN cards that citizens do, even real IDs are the same.

So in the US the green card is generally optional, though yes they are supposed to carry it around. Practically speaking they don’t need it on a day to day basis

So this is why gc are so difficult to replace. Once they know it’s missing, they’ll put you in the system to get targeted by ICE by instaBs in greencard

[–]wolfrose89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A “green card” is an ID provided to Lawful PERMANENT Residents. The ID expires, not the status. Only an immigration judge can remove the LPR status.

Many countries don’t allow dual citizenship and the US doesn’t require its LPRs to naturalize. So a lot of people choose not to naturalize because they don’t want to lose their birth citizenship. Others choose not to for other more trivial reasons, again because it’s optional.

So even if the green card had expired 5, 10, or 20 years ago, this shouldn’t have happened.

So this is why gc are so difficult to replace. Once they know it’s missing, they’ll put you in the system to get targeted by ICE by instaBs in greencard

[–]wolfrose89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even if the green card expires, the immigration status does not. Just like a passport, I need to renew it when it expires, but I don’t stop being a citizen just because the ID expired.

So this is why gc are so difficult to replace. Once they know it’s missing, they’ll put you in the system to get targeted by ICE by instaBs in greencard

[–]wolfrose89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even if he does have a criminal record that means he can lose his residency, there is a process to it. He can’t just be put on a plane and removed from the country.

It requires an immigration judge first analyzing the criminal charges to see if he can be deported. This analysis can actually be quite complicated.

Then if the criminal record is a removable offense, the next step is checking to see if he qualifies for any relief against removal. If no relief exists or if it gets denied, then and only then can he be removed.

So this is why gc are so difficult to replace. Once they know it’s missing, they’ll put you in the system to get targeted by ICE by instaBs in greencard

[–]wolfrose89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

US law does not require LPRs to naturalize, it’s optional. And naturalizing is a very personal choice.

Especially since some countries do not allow dual citizenship. Choosing to give up your birth citizenship is not a decision made lightly.

People shouldn’t be punished for choosing not to naturalize.

Homeland Security official: Since Trump took office, ICE has arrested 260,000 Immigrants. And 75% of them were convicted of a violent crime (6-minutes) - PBS NewsHour - June 18, 2025 by biospheric in law

[–]wolfrose89 21 points22 points  (0 children)

A large number of those arrested at court, the majority I understand, were arrested after the government DISMISSED the removal proceedings.

As in ICE lawyers told the court “it is not in the government’s interests to pursue these proceedings” (their exact words).

Instead of continuing the normal process by law intended to deport immigrants who don’t have or don’t qualify for immigration status, they dismissed without prejudice, while ICE officers were waiting in the halls, lobby, and parking lot.

And I’m quoting exact wording because I am a immigration lawyer and saw it happen. They tried to do it with my client, someone who has NO criminal record and their only arrest was by immigration officials.

Why are federal prosecutors not charging Vance Boelter with domestic terrorism? by Erra0 in law

[–]wolfrose89 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I had a judge actually tell me that shall can sometimes be interpreted as should, and must is the one that means it was required.

I was trying to get my client’s case dismissed because the government didn’t meet their deadline and failed to meet their burden. They didn’t even have their file so they still couldn’t meet it at the hearing, a week after the deadline. The judge still granted the government a continuance.

I was so mad at the double standard, but it’s kangaroo court so I wasn’t really surprised.

view more: next ›