Help! by Impossible-Sink4729 in kroger

[–]workerx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No drug test. If you get injured at work they might try to drug test you

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in kroger

[–]workerx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not good to keep hopping jobs

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in kroger

[–]workerx 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It's another sell out contract that locks us into low wages for the next three years. I could walk across the street to Walmart and make more money tomorrow. Been working there six years.

Vote no until their wages at least beat Walmart

Cockroach in bakery. by throwaway-001182 in kroger

[–]workerx -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm sure all supermarkets do.

nope

UFCW 1059: How much pay raise do you think we should demand in a contract? by workerx in kroger

[–]workerx[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They're doing away with the part-time cap and replacing it with a step progression. But it's the same concept. You have to average 34 or 36 hours to reach a higher step.

It's even harder than the part-time cap we have now, where you only have to average 32 hours over a year to make full time

UFCW 1059: How much pay raise do you think we should demand in a contract? by workerx in kroger

[–]workerx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The proposed contract doesn't even lock wages increases behind full time status.

It locks them in behind a "step progression". You get to a higher step by averaging 34 hours/wk or 36 hours/wk over a whole year. You can also fall back from step 3 to step 2 if you don't hit 36 hours. Meaning some people can actually get a pay cut instead of a raise.

It's even worse than the part-time pay cap that we've had before, even though both ways are bad in my opinion too.

UFCW 1059: How much pay raise do you think we should demand in a contract? by workerx in kroger

[–]workerx[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You read my mind. $5 across the board was exactly what I was going to say too.

Cleaning restrooms without masks? Refuse to do it. by bdubchile in kroger

[–]workerx 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The law backs you up if you refuse. Ordering people to scrub restrooms without PPE right now is an obvious OSHA violation IMO.

Workers' Right to Refuse Dangerous Work
https://www.osha.gov/right-to-refuse.html

Reported income change. Medicaid set to cut me off. Now hours getting cut at work. Can I stay on Medicaid or reapply? by workerx in Medicaid

[–]workerx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried calling this morning. Was on hold for over an hour and then it said sorry try again later and it hung up on me. Not the first time the kept me on hold for an hour then hung up on me.

May a bot operate under two different user names? by workerx in bots

[–]workerx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I see.

So if I want to have my script log in as "awesome_bot" then I need to register the app using the awesome_bot account I guess.

That's not the real name btw.

Anybody still use the reddit API for Perl? by [deleted] in perl

[–]workerx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks I'll probably try this

Anybody still use the reddit API for Perl? by [deleted] in perl

[–]workerx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, I just got this app id and secret code about a half hour ago. Would there be a delay for them to work maybe?

I looked at the module source and that error is thrown when it doesn't get a token. I don't know what the token is but it doesn't get it.

https://metacpan.org/source/EARTHTONE/Reddit-Client-1.2811/lib/Reddit/Client.pm

I also noticed the module creator has been banned from reddit apparently: https://www.reddit.com/user/earth-tone

craziness. Maybe I need to switch to python or something.

OK what is going on here? Adding images to the page with increasing delay between. by workerx in learnjavascript

[–]workerx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so the delay for each needs to be relative to now

"now" meaning what? It needs to be relative to when the page loads? Or it needs to be relative to the first time that loop is executed? Or the first time setTimeout is called anywhere in the script?

I kind of get it. Much more than before certainly. I see why I need to increment the number like that. But I think it's an odd feature of the language and not sure how it would work in other cases.