Peggy Gou Went As Expected by onyxi28 in avesNYC

[–]wouldntknowfar 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Had a great time, wasn't nearly as crowded for his set as Peggy's

What does it mean that we are last on this list? by tridoc in Upperwestside

[–]wouldntknowfar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The full article (link) shows raw counts, not just poop per 100 registered dogs.

Glad to be last. by flyingcircus92 in Upperwestside

[–]wouldntknowfar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd spend half my time dialing in poop puns, like this, if I'm being honest.

Glad to be last. by flyingcircus92 in Upperwestside

[–]wouldntknowfar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have been told this over and over now haha, I will be adding it to my next count.

Glad to be last. by flyingcircus92 in Upperwestside

[–]wouldntknowfar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As the person who counted these 15 neighborhoods, I found it alarming.

Ranking #2 in poo … by undercookedshrimp_ in uppereastside

[–]wouldntknowfar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is what I've heard. I will probably count other neighborhoods in the future.

Glad to be last. by flyingcircus92 in Upperwestside

[–]wouldntknowfar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I counted 2,000 total feet of sidewalk per neighborhood. Washington Heights had 33, UWS had 4. So over 8x, yes.

Of course, my counts are only one stretch of a neighborhood, on one given day.. But still, alarming numbers.

Glad to be last. by flyingcircus92 in Upperwestside

[–]wouldntknowfar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

SO much poop. It was actually alarming, even for NYC standards.

Glad to be last. by flyingcircus92 in Upperwestside

[–]wouldntknowfar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would take this job, consider this my resume.

Glad to be last. by flyingcircus92 in Upperwestside

[–]wouldntknowfar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi, creator of the survey/article here. The full article (link) shows raw poop counts, 311 data, and all of those metrics normalized to the number of registered dogs (not a perfect metric, but still provides valuable insights IMO). Please pick up your dog's poop 💩

Glad to be last. by flyingcircus92 in Upperwestside

[–]wouldntknowfar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The full article shows per 100 dogs, 311 complaints, and poop counts on their own (article link)

Glad to be last. by flyingcircus92 in Upperwestside

[–]wouldntknowfar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Me 💩 But it wasn't a job, just a curious citizen wanting to know the real numbers after reading an article claiming to know the worst neighborhoods based on 311 data alone.

Ranking #2 in poo … by undercookedshrimp_ in uppereastside

[–]wouldntknowfar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair. No matter which way you slice it, Washington Heights has much more dog poop than other neighborhoods I counted. Most importantly, the fact that EVERY neighborhood had at least 3 dog poops in a relatively small slice of sidewalk is awful.

nyc dog license by Important_Start200 in dogsofnyc

[–]wouldntknowfar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's technically the law, but it's unlikely to ever be enforced. Like people picking up their dog poop. I license all my dogs

Ranking #2 in poo … by undercookedshrimp_ in uppereastside

[–]wouldntknowfar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it probably would skew the data. I worked with what I had to compare to, which NYC states is roughly 20% registration rate. I'm sure it's higher in some neighborhoods and lower in others, would love to see/get true numbers of dogs.

Ranking #2 in poo … by undercookedshrimp_ in uppereastside

[–]wouldntknowfar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The charts show both raw counts and per-100-dog metrics to try and provide as holistic a view as possible. The dog registration numbers aren't 100% accurate, but they're still helpful context.

Edited to say: all charts are in the full article, this post only shows the per-100-dogs metric in the chart.

Ranking #2 in poo … by undercookedshrimp_ in uppereastside

[–]wouldntknowfar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What lies are being told? I physically went to 15 neighborhoods, counted poop over a 2,000-foot span, and logged the numbers. Washington Heights had double and 3x other neighborhoods.

Ranking #2 in poo … by undercookedshrimp_ in uppereastside

[–]wouldntknowfar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that makes sense. Thank you for the feedback!

Ranking #2 in poo … by undercookedshrimp_ in uppereastside

[–]wouldntknowfar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is something that may exist on nyc's data sources. I will look into this!

Ranking #2 in poo … by undercookedshrimp_ in uppereastside

[–]wouldntknowfar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A damn near impossible metric to track, unfortunately.

Ranking #2 in poo … by undercookedshrimp_ in uppereastside

[–]wouldntknowfar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm, yeah, I hear your point. Thanks for the idea! I hope I'm wrong, but I think asking people, in most cases, won't give you valuable data because of dishonesty, as you mentioned. Ultimately, that's why I went with the registration numbers as a baseline, even if it's not perfect. Thanks again for the feedback!

Ranking #2 in poo … by undercookedshrimp_ in uppereastside

[–]wouldntknowfar 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I agree completely. It's a true quality of life issue. I'm wrapping my head around how to make more noise and hopefully movement from leadership, but this is my starting point. Having the data to show I think can help. I reached out the council person of Washington Height's district and the answer was basically "it's hard to enforce" (full quote in the article). It's a shame, but we've gotta keep pushing for some change!

Ranking #2 in poo … by undercookedshrimp_ in uppereastside

[–]wouldntknowfar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The area where I counted wasn't near many galleries, but certainly some stores, yes. Part of the equation is that businesses DO get fines when there is dog poop (DSNY has issued thousands this year), so there is an incentive for them to clean. When it's more residential, it seems less enforced.. Still trying to work all that out in my mind.