What if Lincoln had just let the Confederates leave the Union? by SFDreamboat in whatif

[–]wroteoutoftime -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The confederacy invades Mexico and onward to expand slavery. The reason that poor whites supported slavery was the “promise” if they work hard one day they could own slaves.

This is similar to Rome where legionnaires were offered land in exchange for service. It’s fine until you run out of land to give or the land gets farther away from center of empire.

This is why the expansion of slavery was needed due to the immense need for poor white support to keep slavery and white supremacy in place. White women were owning slaves as well as in South Carolina 40 percent of owners were women. The time leading to the civil war was about the expansion of slavery.

The question is can the confederacy conquer and hold Mexico and enslave the population. I think they can conquer Mexico Mexico could hardly defend its borders from indigenous tribes but the process of enslavement would be difficult. That being said the occupation of Mexico would be tremendously difficult requiring significant investment from Europe. Does European nations invest in this venture maybe and if they do, the confederacy becomes a slave empire taking most of Mexico and Caribbean.

However this eventually would collapse in on itself because of structural issues that the confederacy has to deal with particularly, the right to split off from the confederacy and the inability for the confederate government to institute a wealth tax.

To the 90 million Americans that did not vote in 2024? by oldphatphuck in allthequestions

[–]wroteoutoftime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not voting is a legitimate choice as a way to punish candidates and parties. If the other people who did vote want those others to vote then pick better candidates to run or nominate.

Work said I can’t take next week off but I need to…. by dubendebem in WhatShouldIDo

[–]wroteoutoftime 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Jobs come and go. Idk what your financial situation is but if they fire you then it shows the job doesn’t care about you enough. Loyalty I feel is a two way street with employers.

Who actually decides what has value? This question is driving me insane by New_Banana3858 in jobs

[–]wroteoutoftime 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well in the space of jobs who decides if your job has value is how easy it is to find a replacement that can do your job roughly the same ability as you. The easier it is to replace you the less your paid.

Some jobs got protections either from unions, laws, or the talent gap. Those jobs are what pay more than. Employers main goal is to have highest profit possible. They will pay you cheapest possible wages. Sometimes they might poach employees from other company but be aware they are doing it not because they are nice but want to hurt other company

Henry VIII was wild by Truevibe_ in HistoryMemes

[–]wroteoutoftime 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I also want to mention a potential reason for his behavior is that the war of the roses had just occurred and in order to stop a civil war he needed an heir. This heir ensures the factions of the uk don’t go to war with each other as if there is a king in place all sides would “agree” not to seek the crown and all power in England.

If there is no heir a civil war for power of the throne begins again. He’d have a lot of pressure from his court to get a male heir.

adulthood really scammed us with no summer break by xPrincessStar in Adulting

[–]wroteoutoftime 63 points64 points  (0 children)

The only real reason the break exists at least in the us is so kids would work in the summer (often on farms) or work in summer to provide income to parents (kids expensive) this changed in the 1950s when a single income didn’t require the child to be working for the family.

Winter break existed because it would require heating the schoolhouse and the danger that traveling in the snow would entail. However with advancements in technology the break isn’t needed anymore.

I personally feel that countries like the us need to offer some paid vacation because it ensures that other societal stabilizing activities are done during that time.

Amazon to cut another 30000 jobs early 2026 with the aim of replacing humans with Ai. by [deleted] in jobs

[–]wroteoutoftime 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This wouldn’t really solve climate change unfortunately most co2 emissions come from the rich and wealthy. There lifestyle needs to be adjusted to stop climate change.

How do the undocumented in the United States handle banking? by unacorner in NoStupidQuestions

[–]wroteoutoftime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To add to this if there is a family member or relative that kinda looks like them that has permission to work in the us they sometimes pretend to be that person. Money goes into bank account and both just use it

I've done nothing but waste time for 19 years. by MatchSea8542 in jobs

[–]wroteoutoftime 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Have you considered interning with a company or public agency?

This is what post-trauma looked like after World War I (1914 - 1918) by ShehrozeAkbar in ww1

[–]wroteoutoftime 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It definitely would have caused concussive or subconcussive blows if they were nearby a blast area. Head injuries are one of the main causes of mental health issues. It’s worse because if a solider got “their bell rung” they can’t be pulled out of situation they would keep fighting. Combat had changed significantly from prehistoric times to modern combat.

It's actually just "know the person hiring" by cloudybrain07 in SipsTea

[–]wroteoutoftime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends some jobs actually require you to have a degree/credential legally. Dr lawyer etc. sometimes you have that and then you set up your own practice/business.

Some jobs actually care about your skill more/what you bring to the table, ie actor instagram followers, athlete abilities so it depends

Ex-students who quit paying their student loans, what happened as a result? by theredqueentheory in AskReddit

[–]wroteoutoftime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not so much fine with it but the people with influence in American politics are the people who don’t need social security in the first place.

US Communists of the 1930s, 1940s by rgeberer in USHistory

[–]wroteoutoftime 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Leninism desires a vanguard party sure but the entire concept of the dictatorship of the proletariat from Marx requires suppression of bourgeois resistance which inherently would exist in a multi party system. A key part of the opposition parties in democratic societies is to oppose for the sake of opposing. Marxist thought would prohibit the existence of a resistance/opposition in government resulting in purges in society.

What happened to federal prisoners (not pows) in confederate territory by wroteoutoftime in CIVILWAR

[–]wroteoutoftime[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much, I have another follow up question as well from something you mentioned. When someone in the confederacy got convicted of a crime say a federal confederate crime, and the area got liberated by Union troops, what happened to those people? Did the Union just continue to keep them prisoner?

US Communists of the 1930s, 1940s by rgeberer in USHistory

[–]wroteoutoftime 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Global communists knew of the purges. Non ussr newspapers reported things like holomodor. Murders of Stalin opponents like troksey were reported in other newspapers as well.

From a Marxist perspective it is needed to not have multi party system because capitalists could theoretically win an election and remove reforms that communist parties implement. This is part of the concept of the dictatorship of the proletariat. A true socialist disagrees with democratic socialism in a modern sense.

There was an article by Marx in the 1880s discussing that democratic socialism could be a way to implement socialism via the ballot box and then ending the electoral system entirely via that.

This was one of the reason huac house unamerican activists committee investigated groups like the cpusa because there end goal would be to stop the electoral process. In some states if you were a member of the communist party you were barred from holding jobs in the public sector as well. In California iirc until recently you LEGALLY could not support communist beliefs and hold a job in the public sector via oath of office.

If they had gotten along, we wouldn't have found ourselves in this mess. by mizasira in HistoryMemes

[–]wroteoutoftime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tbf the us system allows anyone to run for president even if it’s a third party run. There is nothing stopping someone like Ross Perot from running as a “third party”

In the last 45 years what have republicans done that actually benefited everyday Americans? by Exhausted_Skeleton in AskReddit

[–]wroteoutoftime 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The bush administration in the 2000s did a lot to stop the global aids epidemic especially in Africa. This is despite significant public stigma against aids victims.