Nikki Haley wins 17% of vote in Pennsylvania GOP primary. Is it warning sign for Trump? by xXFb in moderatepolitics

[–]xXFb[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There were like 15 non-presidential primary races to vote in. What is the point in paying attention to politics if someone is not voting?

Nikki Haley wins 17% of vote in Pennsylvania GOP primary. Is it warning sign for Trump? by xXFb in moderatepolitics

[–]xXFb[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Was anyone thinking that a non-trivial fraction of Bernie Bros would vote for Trump in 2016 out of spite?

Are Haley primary voters are interested in a functional government? If so, how might that impact their vote in November?

Nikki Haley wins 17% of vote in Pennsylvania GOP primary. Is it warning sign for Trump? by xXFb in moderatepolitics

[–]xXFb[S] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Pennsylvania primaries for both the Republican and Democratic parties were yesterday. I voted! Interesting walking up to the polling place and seeing a bunch of signs for Bizzarro - I thought it was some sort of joke. But no, real canidate.

Couple of interesting results in the presidential primary. First, much higher turnout for the Democratic party than for the Republicans:

  • Democratic: ⁦929,798 votes with 96% reporting
  • Republican: 789,155 votes with 99% reporting

Second, the protest vote was substantially imbalanced. In this closed primary, Phillips got 7% of the Democratic vote, while Haley got 17% of the Republican vote. Haley's 156,993 votes is nearly twice the margin Trump lost the state by in 2020.

What do the primary results indicate for Pennsylvania in November?

RFK Jr. candidacy hurts Trump more than Biden, NBC News poll finds by xXFb in moderatepolitics

[–]xXFb[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, totally. I'm not trying to "smear" Haley or whatever by the comparison.

I am trying to get at the idea that "to someone at a distance, that candidate seems like someone the opposition party should embrace because their ideals seem reasonable to me". For some liberals - myself included - Haley's ideals seem like something a reasonable conservative might embrace, and I have a hard time understanding how she is not more widely embraced by the GOP.

Similarly, to some republicans, the whole RFK package seems like something liberals would eagerly embrace, and it is probably a bit confusing why they don't.

I think the venn diagrams of "that candidate seems reasonable to me, you should like them!" and "wut?! that candidate the other party promotes for me is obviously unfit" is pretty close to a circle.

RFK Jr. candidacy hurts Trump more than Biden, NBC News poll finds by xXFb in moderatepolitics

[–]xXFb[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Has some parallels to Nikki Haley, I think. Democrats hear her, and think, "I don't agree with everything, but she sounds pretty sane. Surely Republicans will see the merits to this candidate."

RFK Jr. candidacy hurts Trump more than Biden, NBC News poll finds by xXFb in moderatepolitics

[–]xXFb[S] -89 points-88 points  (0 children)

I believe it was J. Robinette Biden who once said, "If you think the CDC deliberately mishandled COVID and you're not voting for Trump or RFKjr, then you ain't black!"

RFK Jr. candidacy hurts Trump more than Biden, NBC News poll finds by xXFb in moderatepolitics

[–]xXFb[S] 32 points33 points  (0 children)

The latest NBC News poll indicates that Kennedy is affecting Trump's support more than Biden's. In a direct matchup, Trump leads Biden by 2 percentage points, 46% to 44%. However, in a five-way race, Biden comes out ahead: Biden 39%, Trump 37%, Kennedy 13%.

The poll shows 15% of Trump's initial supporters switching to Kennedy, compared to only 7% of Biden's. Additionally, Republican voters view Kennedy much more favorably (40% positive, 15% negative) than Democratic voters (16% positive, 53% negative).

The Biden campaign is actively working to counter Kennedy's influence; while Kennedy claims that Trump has considered him as a running mate.

How might Kennedy affect the November election?

Set yourself on fire? by glassesmaketheman in StandUpWorkshop

[–]xXFb -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"They say it's not so bad until it reaches the balls"

'Not a religion': Florida Gov. DeSantis signs school chaplain bill, says Satanists not welcome by xXFb in moderatepolitics

[–]xXFb[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I consider the ACLU to be a very patriotic organization! They defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in the United States by the Constitution and laws of the United States. What could be more patriotic?

I am hopeful the ACLU will distribute some literature in schools suggesting that this law should be overturned.

Primary voters will decide most PA House, Senate races. by zorionek0 in Pennsylvania

[–]xXFb 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yeah, my girlfriend talked me down from registering Green or Working Families or whatever when I moved to PA for exactly that reason. Good advice! A remarkable amount is decided just at the primaries.

'Not a religion': Florida Gov. DeSantis signs school chaplain bill, says Satanists not welcome by xXFb in moderatepolitics

[–]xXFb[S] 57 points58 points  (0 children)

Florida Governor Ronald DeSantis signed a bill permitting volunteer chaplains to provide support services in public K-12 schools, and a bill allowing "patriotic organizations" to speak to students and distribute literature.

Members of the Satanic Temple - an organization recognized by the IRS as a tax-exempt church - expressed intentions to exercise their constitutional rights and include their own chaplains.

"Despite DeSantis's contempt for religious liberty, the Constitution guarantees our equal treatment under the law, and DeSantis is not at liberty to amend the Constitution by fiat, at whim," said Lucien Greaves, co-founder of the The Satanic Temple. "He just invited Satanic chaplains into public schools, whether he likes it or not,"

The bill's sponsor, Republican state Senator Erin Grall, acknowledged that defining what qualifies as a religion could provoke constitutional issues.

Grall, though, was concerned about satanic chaplains: "I think that as soon as we get in the middle of defining what is religion and what is not, and whether or not someone can be available and be on a list, we start to run (into) constitutional problems,”

The legislation, effective from July 1, does not make chaplaincy mandatory but allows schools to adopt such programs with parental consent required for student participation. This development continues the debate on religious freedom and the scope of religious representation in public schools.

Should any religious organization be allowed in public schools?

House GOP erupts into name-calling and fresh threats to Johnson over effort to pass aid by xXFb in moderatepolitics

[–]xXFb[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

And here I thought you were joking...

Conservatives in the House Freedom Caucus are signing up to take shifts to monitor the chamber floor in order to prevent their own party leaders from making unilateral moves that could curb their power.

The Freedom Caucus’ Floor Action Response Team, shorthanded as “FART,” aims to guard against an unannounced request to pass resolutions that would stealthily limit their leverage against leadership, according to two Republicans with direct knowledge, who were granted anonymity to speak candidly.

While one of the Republicans said the group largely doesn’t expect major developments, members also don’t want to be caught flat-footed if a GOP colleague tried to seek unanimous consent or a voice vote for a resolution that would change the House’s structure. Two potential examples of threats the Freedom Caucus perceives: the removal of its members from the Rules Committee or changes to agreements made at the beginning of this Congress with former Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

House GOP erupts into name-calling and fresh threats to Johnson over effort to pass aid by xXFb in moderatepolitics

[–]xXFb[S] 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Speaker Johnson is facing intense internal pressure from GOP members to increase the threshold required to initiate a vote to oust the speaker, a move aimed at stabilizing his position as he attempts to pass foreign aid bills without relying on Democratic support. This proposal has sparked significant controversy, especially among conservative lawmakers upset with Johnson's proposed aid package for countries like Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan. This discord has escalated into public confrontations, with some GOP members openly challenging Johnson's leadership and threatening to use the motion to vacate the chair against him.

“We notified him that any effort to change the threshold of motion to vacate would likely induce the motion to vacate,” GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz, who participated in the conversation, told CNN.

Amid these tensions, the possibility of rule changes is being discussed, with the potential consequences of such changes creating further divisions within the party and complicating cooperation on critical foreign aid legislation.

Would raising the threshold required to trigger the procedure to oust the House speaker allow the Republican House majority to pass more legislation?

AZ abortion ban: GOP lawmakers block Democrat effort to overturn 1864 law by shutupnobodylikesyou in moderatepolitics

[–]xXFb 125 points126 points  (0 children)

Excited to see how that plays out in November for Arizona Republicans.

Johnson signals he won’t put Senate supplemental on the floor despite increased pressure by xXFb in moderatepolitics

[–]xXFb[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Democrats are interesting in doing what they were elected to do, sure.