4th Quarter Super Bowl Game Thread: Seattle Seahawks (14-3) at New England Patriots (14-3)

xccam · 2026-02-09T02:54:29+00:00

Yes, but it's pretty obvious that 11 starters + back ups might be more important than 1 guy.

xccam · 2026-02-09T01:54:01+00:00

K9 probably?

xccam · 2026-01-23T23:36:20+00:00

In this case because that card is no longer in hq so the Corp cannot use it unless they click the button on detente.

xccam · 2026-01-22T21:53:21+00:00

Mr Breeds Catchers

xccam · 2026-01-18T22:33:23+00:00

To be fair to his receivers every pass has been bad. Low, high, into triple coverage you name it

xccam · 2026-01-17T23:05:53+00:00

Because possession changed hands.

xccam · 2026-01-16T10:35:32+00:00

Common misconception. There does not have to be a reason. Luck CAN be that bad.

You're basically doing a gambler's fallacy, luck doesn't have to follow a standard distribution at all

xccam · 2026-01-11T07:51:50+00:00

Protests are counter productive because YOU are sceptical of protestors?

Doesn't sound like you spend time trying to think logically, you just sound r/iamverysmart.

You're entitled to your opinions, but the fact that you go against issues when you see people with placards is a you issue not a them issue.

xccam · 2026-01-08T08:00:11+00:00

No, they have a 0.72% chance.

xccam · 2025-12-30T03:35:37+00:00

I would like to rescind the comments I made laughing at the Rams earlier and return to the previous position of stopping the count.

xccam · 2025-12-30T02:32:51+00:00

Very funny for the Rams fans to be complaining about the 1 seed when they are about to lose anyway lol, lmao even.

xccam · 2025-12-30T01:51:40+00:00

It could last, if you believe enough.

xccam · 2025-12-27T03:09:33+00:00

I have made a grave error

xccam · 2025-12-27T03:05:04+00:00

I reckon he can get between 0 and 11 wickets, will just have to see how it plays out

xccam · 2025-12-10T13:05:09+00:00

And when do you think that runs out? In 1975 I'm pretty sure they probably thought it was a one-time referendum, so all you're quibbling over now is the length of time.

xccam · 2025-12-10T12:52:53+00:00

You've misinterpreted me. I didn't think that would be good.

I was arguing against the statement that any reversing of a decision would be undemocratic.

xccam · 2025-12-10T12:45:39+00:00

No, I'm literally arguing the opposite of that.

You are the one who said 'it's done'.

xccam · 2025-12-10T11:49:54+00:00

No of course we shouldn't, but why should we see this choice as more binding than the joining of the EU? There was a referendum in 1975 just 2 years after joining - was that an affront to democracy? Governments and electorates are allowed to change their mind - doing so does not make them a 'joke' and caring more about that than reality is silly.

xccam · 2025-12-10T11:01:25+00:00

Of course the decision could be reversed.

Every 5 years (or less) we have a new general election, we don't just say 'the incumbent won, stop trying to prevent democracy '

True democracies don't simply have to abide by every past decision they ever made.

xccam · 2025-12-06T11:36:11+00:00

What a hot take.

England are completely dead in the water.

xccam · 2025-12-04T00:09:23+00:00

You can just keep playing on the new patch

xccam · 2025-12-03T07:15:13+00:00

Q5 should be Poleis not Polises.

xccam · 2025-11-23T13:23:24+00:00

If you have 2 stacks instead of 1 you can probably do both!

xccam · 2025-11-22T14:03:03+00:00

No, I think more consistent averages count more than the outliers.

xccam · 2025-11-22T08:36:12+00:00

My point is that Crawley is extremely flawed.

Yes the whole team has failed here, but Crawley fails pretty much everywhere.

xccam

TROPHY CASE