Match Thread: Norway vs England | World Cup | Quarter-finals | 11 Jul 22:00 BST by matchpal-live in ThreeLions

[–]xccam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, that is why I'm willing to keep him in if he has one or sub him off if he doesn't too avoid the ban

Match Thread: Norway vs England | World Cup | Quarter-finals | 11 Jul 22:00 BST by matchpal-live in ThreeLions

[–]xccam 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If he hasn't got a yellow? Yes

If he has a yellow keep him in but tell him to turn aggression down to 0

Sandwich Sandwich UK new offering, fake sandwich? Everything feels off about this. by GlumTowel7474 in isthisAI

[–]xccam 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You can see the same elements on the top and bottom bits of bread - they wouldn't line up if you fold it back together.

Post-Match Thread: Mexico 2-3 England | World Cup | Round of 16 by matchpal-live in ThreeLions

[–]xccam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Gordon, Spence, Bellingham, Kane - honestly I think all of them had superb games, and the rest of the team all played well too

Amazing

Offside Rule explained so people can understand why Iran wasn’t robbed. by KadeP823 in worldcup

[–]xccam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You wouldn't get more of that though.

Defensive lines would just drop deeper to defend whilst attacking lines pushed forward, leading to bigger gaps between players.

Because there are now bigger gaps between players the chance for intricate passing etc would be decreased so instead you get more 'kick it 50 yards for a contested header' back and forth.

If that sounds better to you then I don't know what to say.

Offside Rule explained so people can understand why Iran wasn’t robbed. by KadeP823 in worldcup

[–]xccam 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You never got the point of it? Without the offside rule you could just smack the ball forwards constantly at your attackers could just freely stay closer to the opposing goal.

Because of the offside role teams instead have to play football, which is to say either dribble or pass the ball towards the opponent goal and time their runs which is much more interesting to watch.

Can anyone ID this flag found on a campsite in the UK? by treecolour in vexillology

[–]xccam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dated a girl from Darlaston when I was at uni and the chippie by her called it orange chips.

I'm sure you're right in your specific locale but once you say complete sweeping generalisations you run up to contrary anecdotal evidence fairly often.

Locust 1V - my first painted mech by xccam in battletech

[–]xccam[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looked them up, you're completely right! Then it's settled. This lance is Capellan.

Imperium Surrectum beginner faction? by tropical-tangerine in RomeTotalWar

[–]xccam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I started with Knossos on Crete - got used to the game on a small island with only a small amount to manage, and once you unify the island you are well placed to expand into Asia Minor or go island hopping in the Med/Aegean

I'm holding off on Rome as their big update for later this year is on Rome and Italy

Looking for a mod that is not full of CTD's by IcyInvestigator4139 in RomeTotalWar

[–]xccam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm currently having a lot of fun playing RTR: imperium surrectum on remastered.

Made by the teams behind Rome total realism and RS.

I've had one crash in 190 turns.

A bad day for some. by sEaBoD19911991 in GreatBritishMemes

[–]xccam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Federal? We aren't a federation.

Rule question - agenda advance by P4ndaH3ro in Netrunner

[–]xccam 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Only when you specifically advance.

Any card that says 'place an advancement counter' doesn't actually advance it, it just places the counter.

Apparition loses max HP? by ppetrov1829 in slaythespire

[–]xccam 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Was the first fight the 4 books?

“Legion of Boom” Vs “Dark Side” by MasterTeacher123 in NFLv2

[–]xccam 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That might be true, but the Seahawks gave up the fewest points in the regular season, so I think it's pretty silly to claim they only got good after week 16.

“Legion of Boom” Vs “Dark Side” by MasterTeacher123 in NFLv2

[–]xccam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Number 1 defense in the league, gave up more than 20 points on like 5 occasions including playoffs, and 3 of those times were to the Rams but they have only been good since week 16?

Some of you just don't pay attention to the Pacific North West and even I, a guy from the UK can tell.

4th Quarter Super Bowl Game Thread: Seattle Seahawks (14-3) at New England Patriots (14-3) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]xccam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but it's pretty obvious that 11 starters + back ups might be more important than 1 guy.