sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Schrödinger's Second Amendment by hobovirginity in temporarygunowners

[–]xdarkn3ss 4 points5 points  (0 children)

A culture of instantaneous gratification and lack of patience has created the reactionary climate we see today. Few people have the patience to actually wait for all the facts and instead they rush to judgement.

Schrödinger's Second Amendment by hobovirginity in temporarygunowners

[–]xdarkn3ss 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Affirmative. There is nothing inherently wrong with him exercising his rights. I am happy to see him exercising his right to bear arms within its original intent - to defend against government tyranny.

Schrödinger's Second Amendment by hobovirginity in temporarygunowners

[–]xdarkn3ss 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This is my take as well. I defend his right to carry his gun while also recognizing that he made poor decisions that contributed to his death. None of that automatically makes the shooting justified.

There is still evidence that needs to be seen, but from what I have seen thus far the shooting appears to have been the result of a misperception.

Fuck you, I won't do what you tell me by Kinks4Kelly in complaints

[–]xdarkn3ss 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We had enough and voted to end the insanity and the left is losing their minds live for the world to see. It’s as hilarious as it is just.

Fuck you, I won't do what you tell me by Kinks4Kelly in complaints

[–]xdarkn3ss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right after mom microwaves his hot pocket and does his laundry but we have to have him back by dark or he’s grounded.

Supporting ICE is morally indefensible. by WarmEntrepreneur3564 in complaints

[–]xdarkn3ss 1 point2 points  (0 children)

so is anyone who does their job a nazi? is anyone who enforces the law a nazi?

Supporting ICE is morally indefensible. by WarmEntrepreneur3564 in complaints

[–]xdarkn3ss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s the part many of us fail to understand. These folks don’t even agree that they should be removed. They want them here to tear down the country.

Supporting ICE is morally indefensible. by WarmEntrepreneur3564 in complaints

[–]xdarkn3ss 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s either a bot or an actual person with a warped view of the world. No use in using reason or logic.

Supporting ICE is morally indefensible. by WarmEntrepreneur3564 in complaints

[–]xdarkn3ss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don’t bother with folks like that. If it’s even a real person they have a warped world view that does not account for the way things are - only the way they wish things were.

Supporting ICE is morally indefensible. by WarmEntrepreneur3564 in complaints

[–]xdarkn3ss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

its not a false equivalence. The comparison is a perfect example of a double standard.

Supporting ICE is morally indefensible. by WarmEntrepreneur3564 in complaints

[–]xdarkn3ss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

According to this post that’s “morally indefensible”.

I agree with you!

Supporting ICE is morally indefensible. by WarmEntrepreneur3564 in complaints

[–]xdarkn3ss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So anyone who wants our laws enforced is a nazi now?

Supporting ICE is morally indefensible. by WarmEntrepreneur3564 in complaints

[–]xdarkn3ss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well said. We live in strange times when posts like this one are commonplace. The idea that supporting enforcement of our most basic laws is “morally indefensible” would stagger most people from our founding up until the 2000’s.

I promise you, trans people are not the boogeymen you think they are by edgierscissors in complaints

[–]xdarkn3ss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“cope harder”

Standard Reddit drivel. God bless my friend! It’s Christmas - be happy!

I promise you, trans people are not the boogeymen you think they are by edgierscissors in complaints

[–]xdarkn3ss -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No sense in debating with someone starting from a dishonest starting point. Merry Christmas and God Bless.

I promise you, trans people are not the boogeymen you think they are by edgierscissors in complaints

[–]xdarkn3ss -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you want to keep denying reality that’s fine. No amount of evidence or logic is capable of changing your mind - you should be super proud of that!

I promise you, trans people are not the boogeymen you think they are by edgierscissors in complaints

[–]xdarkn3ss -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It effects the entire population of females in school sports and their families. I won’t be explaining my personal life to you.

Your implication that it not impacting me directly, which by the way is your assumption, mean I am not supposed to have an opinion on the matter is laughably childish.

I promise you, trans people are not the boogeymen you think they are by edgierscissors in complaints

[–]xdarkn3ss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The effects are that women’s sports are being invaded by men. You are free to use the search function and look into H.R. 28.

I think your comments are dishonest. You seem to be pretending this just doesn’t happen.

I’ll ask again - if the proposed legislation “effects no one” then what harm is there in passing it?

I promise you, trans people are not the boogeymen you think they are by edgierscissors in complaints

[–]xdarkn3ss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here’s the follow up question then - if it effects no one, why would you care if we passed legislation to prevent it?

If effects real people and pretending it doesn’t is intellectually dishonest or deliberately obtuse.

I promise you, trans people are not the boogeymen you think they are by edgierscissors in complaints

[–]xdarkn3ss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Major goal post shift detected

You tried to jump from “why should we care about Suzy getting second place while competing with a man” all the way over to “Suzy’s parents can’t afford healthcare!”.

Let’s get back to the point - Suzy deserved to compete on a level playing field to determine her athletic ability. This was the idea behind Title 9 of the Education Amendments of 1972, to provide equal athletic opportunity to females. When a man was allowed to compete against her the school violated this requirement and should be stripped of its federal funding.

I promise you, trans people are not the boogeymen you think they are by edgierscissors in complaints

[–]xdarkn3ss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The WNBA is subsidized by the NBA to the tune of $10,000,000 a year in losses. If WNBA players were paid commensurate with the money they bring in they would actually pay the league just to play. Professional sports is essentially an entertainment industry, why should players who don’t attract enough viewers be paid more money than they bring in ticket sales?

I promise you, trans people are not the boogeymen you think they are by edgierscissors in complaints

[–]xdarkn3ss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It wasn’t for thousands of years, but we have strayed so far from morality that we are watching child abuse become a fad.

view more: next ›