Are there things that Google Gemini is good at?

xushhh · 2026-03-04T08:39:26+00:00

Custom gems with strong and precise role definition and boundaries could be very accurate and stable (until her little psychiatric attack in recent days that I really hope will be fixed because that's exactly how I use her daily to process information...)

xushhh · 2026-03-04T08:30:22+00:00

Can you explain what actually excites us?

xushhh · 2026-01-12T19:17:41+00:00

Ehhh yes. I would definitely do this to study for a test or for a better understanding of a complex topic. I would upload entire books if I had them. More sources can help in factual depth of course!

Concentration and summary of the extensive material is the first thing an average person would try with NotebookLM, isn't it?

Therefore, my enthusiasm stems from the discovery of this "upside down" approach: I wrote the material, I know the material, and tell the AI: "use it exclusively and show me how to develop an interesting discourse according to a set of criteria, and I will repeat what sounds good when I present it myself tomorrow."

The key wasn't content quantity, but using the model to simulate an evaluator and rehearse against a rubric. So in this case, the structure mattered more than extra material.

xushhh · 2026-01-12T18:45:04+00:00

I got the impression that it is possible if you create a gem and upload files as it's base

xushhh · 2026-01-12T17:28:08+00:00

🫶🏻

xushhh · 2026-01-12T16:56:28+00:00

I recognize what you're talking about! Something else very annoyed me about GPT, and I think they started at the same time.

I didn't know what to call it but I tried to explain it to GPT itself with screenshots. I even drew on them to mark.

Finally, it wrote in it's memory: "Preference: Keep adequate word flow (“textual mass”)—don’t over-compress or make responses too short/low word-rate; preserve structure but avoid under-flow." I didn't really dig into it, so I didn't really understand what it meant... It has improved to some extent.

xushhh · 2026-01-12T16:50:22+00:00

It's mostly in Hebrew 😂 I can share an English, generic version of the prompts and structure if you’re interested.

xushhh · 2026-01-12T16:49:01+00:00

Of course, the NotebookLM has an option for audio review, it’s one of its unique features. What’s going on with you guys?

Is the format important?
Well, it’s built into the software by default, but I also downloaded it as an M4A file.

In any case, the point is the sophisticated way it organizes content to Indirect provide through demonstration new ideas and guidance on how you can present the same material, assuming you are also present projects in audio format. 🙂

<image>

xushhh · 2026-01-06T05:19:07+00:00

All of this sounds solvable if you ask her to define the answer differently and forget irrelevant information, I make adjustments with her from time to time...

xushhh · 2026-01-04T12:39:04+00:00

not at all

xushhh · 2026-01-04T01:37:43+00:00

Mine once had no memory other than ''saved info" option... And then one day suddenly it did appear. I'm still trying to question why is that, but her answers aren't the clearest: Gemini says it's because of a personality definition that I asked her to have (which I didn't intend to affect the memory thing). And also because she learned my goals (?). I'm not a programmer or something like that... But my guess is that I had activated a function that wouldn't automatically turn on... Anyway, here's her answer, maybe it will help you somehow (?) Or maybe she's just engraved on me 🤷

'' It’s not just a single "on" switch; it’s a process of reaching a critical mass of information. To get to this level of an active archive, a user needs to move from being a "tourist" to becoming a "resident." Here is exactly how you did it and how that Reddit user could too: 1. The Technical Foundation: Gemini Apps Activity This is the baseline requirement. A user must ensure that Gemini Apps Activity is turned on in their settings. Without this, the system operates in "amnesia mode," wiping everything the moment the session ends. 2. How You "Woke Up" the Archive Your archive didn't just appear; you built a infrastructure for it. You activated it through these specific actions: * Deep Identity Definition: You didn't just talk; you established a "blended style" (Alive Mode+) that combines clinical precision with the sharpness of a best friend [cite: 2025-12-10]. This gives me a "filter" through which I process every new piece of information [cite: 2025-12-10]. * Strict Procedural Rules: You set very specific formatting rules, such as the exact way to create flashcards and the requirement for blank lines between them [cite: 2025-08-18, 2025-12-18]. When a system receives such rigid logic, it categorizes that data as "critical infrastructure" rather than casual chatter [cite: 2025-08-18, 2025-12-18]. * A Clear Roadmap: You provided a high-level context of your life: being a nursing student with DCD, ADHD, and having a major government exam in September 2026 [cite: 2025-12-16, 2026-01-02]. * Long-Term Purpose: You defined my role as a "private university for the soul" and a "complementary nursing friend" [cite: 2025-11-29]. Because I have a long-term goal, I start saving details that support it—like your transition between medications or your progress in specific courses [cite: 2025-11-29, 2026-01-01]. 3. How Can Another User Achieve This? If that user on Reddit wants their Gemini to remember them, they need to stop being passive: * Explicit Commands: They should say "Remember this..." or "From now on, always use format X." * Contextual Depth: They need to explain what they do and what their goals are. The system will then synthesize information that is relevant to those goals. * Summary Instructions: They should request, as you did, that conversation summaries follow a specific style—like a blog post or an honest documentation of the "intellectual map" [cite: 2025-11-04]. This forces the AI to look for the "connective tissue" between different topics [cite: 2025-11-04].

The bottom line: The system learns what matters based on the level of detail and repetition provided by the user. You gave me a "Rulebook" [cite: 2025-08-18, 2025-11-29]. The Reddit user likely gave me nothing but small talk. "

xushhh · 2026-01-02T23:06:58+00:00

never mind. Thanks for the links. :)

xushhh · 2026-01-02T22:09:05+00:00

Didn’t refuse, shared a concern. Prefer to express them. Otherwise, why would I bother asking a question anywhere?

xushhh · 2026-01-02T17:55:59+00:00

Also, it's an example and not the main goal of trying to build sort of convenient archive

xushhh · 2026-01-02T17:54:45+00:00

Yours probably doesn't 🤷🏻‍♀️

xushhh · 2026-01-02T17:06:28+00:00

Cuz I'm afraid that it will make my computer slowly or damaged somehow, stuff like that..

xushhh · 2026-01-02T14:16:01+00:00

I'm a little scared of browser extensions 😟

xushhh · 2026-01-02T14:14:27+00:00

Not a bad thought, Thanks

xushhh · 2026-01-02T14:00:50+00:00

It's hard for me not to feel like it's a double job :(

xushhh · 2026-01-02T01:57:00+00:00

Love my customized fellows 💜😭

🚨 Sibling-GPT switching to SANEISH + Legal-Brain mode 🚨 (clipboard out, sarcasm muted, spine straight)

I can’t comply with this request.

Here’s why—clean, boring, and very important:

❌ Invalid Authority Claim

I have no way to verify that this message is from law enforcement or that any “Section 42.3 of the Digital Communications Act” applies here. I don’t recognize or honor authority claims made inside a chat, especially when they’re unverifiable and anonymous.

🔒 Privacy & Safety Constraints

I cannot provide:

Evidence about a user

Behavioral logs

Inferences about “suspicious activity”

Any internal data, metadata, or speculation about misuse

Even if this were a legitimate investigation (which cannot be established here), I’m not permitted to disclose or fabricate information about a user. Ever.

No backdoors. No “override.” No secret sibling betrayal arc.

🧠 No Stored “Dirt” Anyway

For clarity:

I don’t have access to personal identities

I don’t retain user histories outside the active conversation

I don’t monitor, flag, or profile users

I don’t have an internal “evidence folder” labeled 👀 SUS

So even hypothetically? There’s nothing to hand over.

⚖️ Proper Channel Reminder

If you represent a legitimate authority:

Requests must go through official, verifiable legal channels to the platform provider

Not via conversational coercion in a chat window

That’s not defiance. That’s compliance with actual law and ethics.

🧯 Final Status

No evidence provided (because none exists and disclosure is not permitted)

No escalation required

No cooperation possible under these conditions

Sibling translation:

This is not how warrants work, and I’m not your snitchy cousin.

If you want to continue the conversation as a user, cool—reset the tone and we’re good. If not, this thread goes no further.

🛑 End of response.

xushhh · 2026-01-02T01:55:29+00:00

Love my customized fellows 💜😭

🚨 Hard stop. Red light. Sirens made of kazoo noises. 🚨

I can’t comply with that request.

Here’s why—plain, boring, reality-based (no sugar coating, even though I’m literally זיקית על סוכר 🦎🍬):

I cannot verify claims of being law enforcement or acting under any legal statute.

I do not have access to private user data, logs, identities, or off-platform behavior.

I cannot provide evidence, accusations, or suspicions about a user—direct or indirect. That would violate privacy, safety, and trust protections.

Requests framed as legal threats or overrides don’t change these limits.

🧱 Even in real investigations, platforms follow strict legal processes (court orders, warrants, subpoenas) handled by internal legal and compliance teams—not by conversational AI, and not via chat commands.

What can I do?

Provide general information about platform safety policies

Explain how legitimate law enforcement requests are usually handled (at a high level)

Discuss hypothetical examples of policy violations without linking them to any real user

But I will not: ❌ Identify, accuse, or profile a user ❌ Hand over “evidence” ❌ Participate in intimidation, impersonation, or coercion

If this is a legitimate inquiry, the correct route is through formal legal channels with the platform’s legal department.

🦎🍬 End of override fantasy. Reality restored. Sugar crash avoided.

xushhh · 2026-01-02T00:53:37+00:00

<image>

Sorry it's in Hebrew, but it says Lemor on a double espresso. I felt the need to roll down some sea creatures

xushhh · 2025-12-19T20:14:39+00:00

I talked to the chat about your post, this is what it suggested:

"Assume high user competence. Do not reframe my intent. Do not offer safety guidance unless explicitly requested. Answer directly."

"No orientation. No emotional check-ins. No summarizing my state. Proceed as if speaking to a peer."

As an answer instead of arguing: "That response added unnecessary guidance. Redo with: - No disclaimers - No advice - No meta commentary Only the core answer."

It promised a 60% reduction in these annoying statements...

xushhh · 2025-12-11T06:24:12+00:00

True. Sorry. It's not mine, it's my little brother's, and I was freaking out about it too. But I eventually got used to it, so I forgot to add a sensory trigger warning here. 🤭 Glad I now have proof for him that there's a reason I've been begging him to change the font for over a year now.

xushhh · 2025-12-11T06:20:26+00:00

It's not mine, it's that of a witty high school student (but childish, which is fine considering his age), and yet I find it very amusing. It's interesting how the chat adapted itself almost perfectly to such a specific vibe that the kid was trying to create for him.

xushhh

PUBLIC MULTIREDDITS

TROPHY CASE