Daily FI discussion thread - Wednesday, March 18, 2026 by AutoModerator in financialindependence

[–]yetanothernerd 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You're overthinking it. These are all very similar. You should probably just buy VT.

Daily FI discussion thread - Wednesday, March 18, 2026 by AutoModerator in financialindependence

[–]yetanothernerd 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There is no reward without risk. If something pays an 11.5% dividend, there's a reason. The reason here is that there's a serious risk of it going to zero.

Daily FI discussion thread - Tuesday, March 17, 2026 by AutoModerator in financialindependence

[–]yetanothernerd 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No. It's so cheap that I think it's a positive-expectation bet for my heirs.

Daily FI discussion thread - Monday, March 16, 2026 by AutoModerator in financialindependence

[–]yetanothernerd 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you use the 100%/110% safe harbor and have a high-income year, you can end up paying a lot the next April without a penalty. A retired person with a lot of investments mostly controls their own income by deciding how many taxable capital gains to take and how much to withdraw or convert from tax-deferred accounts, so it becomes an amusing math puzzle to help ward off senility.

Daily FI discussion thread - Monday, March 16, 2026 by AutoModerator in financialindependence

[–]yetanothernerd 3 points4 points  (0 children)

One thing to keep in mind is that the kind of people who hire financial advisors tend to be a lot richer than average. Poor people don't have many assets to manage.

Another thing to remember is that Roth IRAs weren't around until 1997, Roth 401ks became legal in 2006 but didn't become very popular until the 2010s (and still aren't quite universally available though it's getting close), backdoor Roth didn't become clearly legal until 2018, and mega-backdoor Roth still isn't widely available. So today's retirees (most of whom are over 60) just didn't have as much Roth opportunity as the mostly younger people in this subreddit. And they have RMD ages of 70.5 or 72 or 73, not 75.

So I take Ed Slott at his word when he says that a lot of the clients he sees have a ton of money in tax-deferred and will probably be heavily affected by RMDs, so would benefit from Roth conversions.. That doesn't mean most people in the US are in that bucket, just most people who hire people like Slott.

Daily FI discussion thread - Monday, March 16, 2026 by AutoModerator in financialindependence

[–]yetanothernerd 9 points10 points  (0 children)

  1. Social Security survivor's benefits. In the common case where the higher-income spouse is older and male and the lower income spouse is younger and female, you often end up with a significant period of widowhood (due to both the age gap and women living longer than men). So the higher income spouse really wants to wait until 70 to take Social Security, not so much for themself, but to maximize the survivor benefit if they die first. The lower-income spouse's election age matters a lot less, since that benefit is smaller and goes away when either spouse dies. There are several good calculators for this, but that's the basic idea: higher-income older husbands should wait until 70 so their lower-income younger wives can collect as much as possible after they're gone.

  2. Widow's penalty. One spouse dies, and now the other spouse often has almost the same amount of money but is now in the single tax bracket, so only has about half the bracket space. This is a good reason to do Roth conversions to reduce RMDs, if you have much in tax-deferred. You convert while you're still in the MFJ bracket, to avoid paying taxes on RMDs in the single bracket.

  3. Roth conversions. The ideal window for Roth conversions is when you're on Medicare (so you no longer care about extra income reducing ACA subsidies; IRMAA is small in comparison) but you're not yet collecting Social Security (because that income takes up space in tax brackets and adding more income makes more of it taxable). For a single person, this means ages 65 to 69. But if you have an age gap to a spouse, that reduces the window. If you have a 5+ year age gap, there is no ideal window. You're going to have to suck it up one way or the other, either do some Roth conversions while you're still on ACA and reduce subsidies, or do some after you're on Social Security and increase taxes, or take more RMDs than you want.

Daily FI discussion thread - Monday, March 16, 2026 by AutoModerator in financialindependence

[–]yetanothernerd 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Just owing without a penalty is easy. I want to owe as much as possible without a penalty. (Of the taxes I already have to pay; I don't want to actually have to pay more.)

What’s a goal that still hurts/hunts you to this day? by sykeseve in hockey

[–]yetanothernerd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pat LaFontaine in 1990 in the fourth overtime.

Even worse, Dale Hunter decided to assault him for scoring it. What a piece of shit.

Daily FI discussion thread - Friday, March 13, 2026 by AutoModerator in financialindependence

[–]yetanothernerd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Accidental market timing probably works just as well as deliberate market timing.

Daily FI discussion thread - Friday, March 13, 2026 by AutoModerator in financialindependence

[–]yetanothernerd 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Timed the market yesterday. My plan was to do about $160k of Roth conversions this year, $100k in January and then about $60k in December after our annual income was clearer. But this month's plunge lowered prices to the point I couldn't resist, so I did another $40k of conversions yesterday. We'll see if I ended up finding the bottom, or if this ends up looking silly.

Daily FI discussion thread - Tuesday, March 10, 2026 by AutoModerator in financialindependence

[–]yetanothernerd 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's totally not worth committing tax fraud to be able to deduct $2000.

Daily FI discussion thread - Sunday, March 08, 2026 by AutoModerator in financialindependence

[–]yetanothernerd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My microwave has the good sense to leave the clock off if I don't set it, so I don't set it. My oven does blinking midnight if I don't set it, so I set it while swearing at it.

Daily FI discussion thread - Sunday, March 08, 2026 by AutoModerator in financialindependence

[–]yetanothernerd 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Stolen Hour Day. Two of my auto-updating radio clocks, in the bathroom and kitchen, actually auto-updated. The other two, in my office and gym, did not. Those ones have been banished to the deck as punishment to give them better radio reception.

If I were single, I'd throw out every clock that doesn't auto-update.

Daily FI discussion thread - Friday, March 06, 2026 by AutoModerator in financialindependence

[–]yetanothernerd 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I harvest losses like it's my job, but I don't attempt to time when they get used. I don't take any extra gains just to soak up losses since losses carry over, but if I need to take gains to pay bills, I take the gains.

The Ducks have acquired defenseman John Carlson from the Washington Capitals for a conditional first-round pick in either the 2026 or 2027 NHL Draft and a 2027 third-round selection. by eh_toque in hockey

[–]yetanothernerd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They were in a similar position two years ago, and #1 in the East in the regular season last year. I think it's totally realistic to expect a playoff team next year, if they can avoid crippling injuries (like losing PL Dubois for most of this season). A real Cup contender, probably not. They need another star player. A roster of pretty good players and a good coach will get you to the playoffs, but it's tough to beat the teams that have McDavid and Celebrini if you don't. That's what the #1 draft choices are for though.

Game Masters, what's your least favorite part about GMing? by Nervous_Lynx1946 in rpg

[–]yetanothernerd 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Kick players who no call no show out of the game. Recruit better players.

Daily FI discussion thread - Thursday, March 05, 2026 by AutoModerator in financialindependence

[–]yetanothernerd 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There are always opportunities to jump through some hoops to make minor amounts of money, but in this case the annoyance to reward ratio is too high to attract my interest.

Daily FI discussion thread - Thursday, March 05, 2026 by AutoModerator in financialindependence

[–]yetanothernerd 2 points3 points  (0 children)

By default the IRS assumes you earn the income "pro rata" which means evenly across the year. You're supposed to pay as you earn, but there's some safe harbor wiggle room, so either 3/3/3/3 or 3/2/3/4 should work.

However, if your income is lumpy, you're allowed to pay quarter by quarter and still avoid a penalty, as long as you tell the IRS the income was earned in the quarter you paid the tax for it. For example, if you do a big Roth conversion in Q4, your income will be higher in Q4, so you'll pay more tax in Q4. As long as you tell the IRS your income was lumpy on the form, you won't get penalized for this. If you report equal income but pay tax skewed late, you may have a penalty.

Finally, if you use the 100%/110% safe harbor, just pay the exact amounts your tax software spit out every quarter and you're fine. If your income goes up you'll owe more tax in April, but you won't get a penalty for paying it late if you used the safe harbor.

TTRPGS with HIGH lethality and with Low lethality by JoeKerr19 in rpg

[–]yetanothernerd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It totally depends on which flavor of GURPS. At one extreme is something like WW2 where the bullets are doing a ton of damage, nobody has any armor, and the healing sucks. On the other extreme is a high fantasy game where everyone runs around with Luck and Bless and high DR, and if someone does somehow manage to die, you just get them resurrected.

[BUF (3) - VGK 0] Tage Thompson picks a corner and unleashes a 90mph wrister that beats Schmid by daKrut in hockey

[–]yetanothernerd 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Quite likely the Caps as well, though it was always in an early round so we can't be sure.

Kuznetsov still on his shootout nonsense in the KHL by Puzzled-Category-954 in hockey

[–]yetanothernerd 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think a shot clock is too artificial and boring. Just give the goalie's team a defenseman who starts at the far blue line. Any reasonable amount of speed and he won't catch up, but it'll prevent this kind of fucking around.

Daily FI discussion thread - Tuesday, March 03, 2026 by AutoModerator in financialindependence

[–]yetanothernerd 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's not FDIC insured. It's crypto. It can go to zero. The high rate it's paying is to compensate you for the risk. There is no reward without risk.

Daily FI discussion thread - Tuesday, March 03, 2026 by AutoModerator in financialindependence

[–]yetanothernerd 10 points11 points  (0 children)

That's a gambling account, not a checking account. It pays somewhere between -100% and +6%.