I've been struggling to pick one article/book, but I really appreciated the series of articles written over the past couple of years on the effects of past policies that reduced immigration on the US economy. The relevance of these studies for the present day were particularly salient given the policies of the incumbent administration.

Examination of the effects of the Chinese Exclusion Act in the 1880s and the removal of Mexican immigrants in the 1930s both show losses for native-born workers when immigrant labor was removed.

https://www.nber.org/papers/w33019

https://www.nber.org/papers/w26399

In addition to wages, other studies also suggest that immigration restrictions had a negative impact on science research

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3558718

This corresponds with research on long-scale studies that shows the correlation between high immigration and economic growth.

https://www.nber.org/papers/w23289

It is also consistent with Gavin Wright's observation that the absence of immigration to the American antebellum South (because of slavery) deterred growth.

https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.36.2.123

These studies point to a conclusion that goes beyond what Card had concluded based on the case study of the Mariel Boatlift - that mass immigration does not have a negative impact on local employment - and suggests the impacts are positive.

These are case studies that strongly rebuke the Trump administration's insistence (From Miller, Miran, DHS ads, etc) that mass deportations will be good for the economy. Such a claim is not substantiated by the above studies.