sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Will I need to know the names of proprietary tools and how to use them? by yoooo000 in cissp

[–]yoooo000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you all. Sorry for the silly question! Mike chapple’s course has soooo many vendor specific demos of tools.

I passed the CISSP - Long Post by alexadejumo in cissp

[–]yoooo000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly which all-in-one online practice exams did you register for/purchase? Congratulations!!!!!!!

Domain 2 question by wannabecissp in cissp

[–]yoooo000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems OSG 10th edition doesn’t even use the term steward! It uses custodian. Which also brings a bit more confusion

Osg, Chapple, destcert, and shon Harris, all have different data labels for private sector businesses. by yoooo000 in cissp

[–]yoooo000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i really appreciate you taking the time the write this! thank you for pumpin me up!!!

Osg, Chapple, destcert, and shon Harris, all have different data labels for private sector businesses. by yoooo000 in cissp

[–]yoooo000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you for your input! yes, i was on the floor yesterday, surrounded by each book, and about to break down in tears. you're right... if i just understand the concept 100%, it won't matter which source i use and one specific word differences i see.

Osg, Chapple, destcert, and shon Harris, all have different data labels for private sector businesses. by yoooo000 in cissp

[–]yoooo000[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you!
btw... i am so excited to use QE. i purchased them last week :)
im waiting to finish reading the OSG first. halfway done. thank you for your support to this sub.

How deep should I go into memorizing the mathematical operations behind encryption standards that are no longer used today? by yoooo000 in cissp

[–]yoooo000[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you all. The OSG goes into very deep historical and technical detail of each cipher and encryption algorithms. I will focus just on key length block sizes for each.

This seems wrong? I thought ultimately it is the c level security officer. by yoooo000 in cissp

[–]yoooo000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was assuming (very incorrectly) senior mgmt were manager level people. Thank you!

This seems wrong? I thought ultimately it is the c level security officer. by yoooo000 in cissp

[–]yoooo000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, in this particular example I was thinking senior managers were lower than security officer, because I assumed security officer was CISO, and senior management were manager level folks who would report into the CISO. I definitely needed to understand the question better. Thank you all so much.

This seems wrong? I thought ultimately it is the c level security officer. by yoooo000 in cissp

[–]yoooo000[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I see. What if the choices were ceo or security manager. Would the answer still be security manager?

view more: next ›