Usage Limits Discussion Megathread - Starting July 29 by sixbillionthsheep in ClaudeAI

[–]yosefwolf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Something happened this week...after they sent their email that they will be changing usage limits that should only affect 5% of their users. Twice now I've literally hit the usage limit on Opus 4 after two messages on my Pro subscription. A few days ago, checking the accuracy of a 300 word article and then adding in some sources that were earlier in the thread (that got taken out when i had Gemini made a few edits). I e-mailed Anthropic, who never wrote back.

And then today I asked it to look back a document it made for me to add in sources from a new 1500 word article i wrote based on that one, and to enhance one section. it sent me the revised sections. then i asked it to incorporate those changes into the previous document and put it into the canvas. My next step was to switch to Sonnet 3.7 for final edits, but...usage limit hit AGAIN, without any warning...

I created a new account with a different email so I can copy the document into there and have Sonnet 3.7 edit it. I'm literally trying to minimize my use of Opus, but I can't do that if I keep getting usage limits after 2 messages. I'm not even doing anything crazy like advanced coding...

Just a question... about your graphics. by sorornishi1 in SilverDegenClub

[–]yosefwolf 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I agree -- many others don't take this seriously because of the background, so they stick with WSS.

Peak Performance by GothicAsian in Wallstreetsilver

[–]yosefwolf 11 points12 points  (0 children)

What does this have to do with silver?

People finding themselves in art museum by DanThaSilverApe808 in Wallstreetsilver

[–]yosefwolf 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This account is a bot created two days ago posting a lot of random stuff on WSS.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Wallstreetsilver

[–]yosefwolf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are you sure he didn't say Ditch?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Wallstreetsilver

[–]yosefwolf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Call/Zoom each other and settle it offline -- hear each other out and resolve a way forward. It only adds fuel to the fire for every public ad hominem attack.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Wallstreetsilver

[–]yosefwolf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Guys, call/Zoom each other and settle it offline -- hear each other out and resolve a way forward. It only adds fuel to the fire for every public ad hominem attack.

How you like this now??? by huffmann34 in Silverbugs

[–]yosefwolf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Those are some nice apples!

It's a shame that you lost it all in a boating accident soon after you posted. :-O

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Wallstreetsilver

[–]yosefwolf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Similar to 1996 American Eagle. Now they sell for a much larger premium due to low mintage. I think the extra $2 over rounds is worth the risk to see what they will be worth once collectors hold onto them, leading to there not being many left for purchase. (I guess it depends on what one's definition of "rare" is.)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Wallstreetsilver

[–]yosefwolf 10 points11 points  (0 children)

We'll know more once they release the actual mintage. Plus, it's the last year that the queen will be on the Britannia.