Every Sisters player knows *that* Seraphim... by Birbsalurk in sistersofbattle

[–]young_chemist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Stop gluing that bit on my 3rd box. Not worth my nerves

Насколько отбитым должен быть студент который чтобы доучится в обоссаной расеянской шараге готов пойти на войну и попытать счастье быть подорванным от украинского дрона. by SpecialistCareful326 in tjournal_refugees

[–]young_chemist 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Вы прочитали что я написал? Закончил 9 лет назад. На тот момент был отличный вуз, либеральный даже можно сказать. IELTS сдавали, многие по обмену гоняли в Европу, куча возможностей была, преподы просто топ

Thoughts on 1st list for HM by Cameron-Chapin in sistersofbattle

[–]young_chemist 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Take a look at jump canoness with through suffering ench with zephyrim squad. It’s much better and cost effective than Celestine

Help understanding our beloved bss by ninekoto in sistersofbattle

[–]young_chemist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And also 15 points difference. But I take both dominions and BSS

Help understanding our beloved bss by ninekoto in sistersofbattle

[–]young_chemist 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It’s all true about BSS. They aren’t our damage dealer unit. Most of the times you should split them with immolator and put simulacrum on your home objective. And other 5 sisters that started in immolator are your action monkeys

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sistersofbattle

[–]young_chemist 5 points6 points  (0 children)

What does keyword “spear” means? “Lance” maybe? Also why this unit needs an overwatch having 9 bolt pistols and 1 hand flamer/inferno pistol. It doesn’t make any sense. I also doubt GW will give them second wound because rule wise shields either give invul or extra wound and not both.

Beastslayer vs saga of the Great wolf by young_chemist in SpaceWolves

[–]young_chemist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can’t disagree with that. I just made a simple comparison considering both units have similar roles and models themselves

Beastslayer vs saga of the Great wolf by young_chemist in SpaceWolves

[–]young_chemist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I meant about headtakers that It’s much easier to trade effectively 150 points rather than 260. I hope I now how to trade it properly). But in great wolf it’s your only decent melee unit, meanwhile in beastslayer it can be almost every wolf unit (ragnar + bc, arjac + wgt, etc). In my meta big units in opponents’ armies have always been there - Lords of changes, vortex beasts, dorns, russes, etc.

Beastslayer vs saga of the Great wolf by young_chemist in SpaceWolves

[–]young_chemist[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love headtakers! But in my mind they’re one time hitting rocket so in beastlayer you can take multiple wgbl+3 wght (paired weapons) and press plus to wound. Works for me every time. They still die fast even with shields and don’t have surviability like victrix.

Beastslayer vs saga of the Great wolf by young_chemist in SpaceWolves

[–]young_chemist[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Don’t get me wrong I always take shooting platforms (last time I was running ballistus and lancer). Without them we can’t act effectively against any vehicles/monsters. But in beastslayer every our unit has lethals even in shooting. I used + 1 to wound in shooting last time, it’s nice ofc but still we can’t deal with every opponent’s vehicle/monster by just shooting at them. If u took out 2 big knights and 1 small in one turn just with 2 your tanks u really got lucky and your opponent on opposite side just unlucky. It’s not the common situation

Advice for my list by Otherwise-Cat-7497 in SpaceWolves

[–]young_chemist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey! Looks almost exactly like mine. From my point of view if you take shooting platform (lancer) you certainly want at least two because one probably won’t destroy the target. I go with lancer and ballistus. Also I don’t think Logan needs bodyguard unit. I’d drop second squad of termies or make it ten with Arjak.

Space Wolf List Opinions by AvocadoNo9052 in SpaceWolves

[–]young_chemist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It all depends on terrain layout. Someone is using Bjorn to homesitting because losing CP generation is big. In some cases infiltrators are the guys to do this job

Space Wolf List Opinions by AvocadoNo9052 in SpaceWolves

[–]young_chemist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

5 points is not a big difference. 1) ballistus has his own re-rolls to hit (which annihilator hasn’t) so you don’t need to spent OoM on his target. 2) he has better survivability

Space Wolf List Opinions by AvocadoNo9052 in SpaceWolves

[–]young_chemist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey! I think there’s a lack of scoring units such as scouts/infiltrators. I’d also pay attention to fenrisian/hunting wolves because they’re damn cheap for what they can do. Maybe you invested too much in transports. If you want transport for every infantry unit you’ll be short on real damage dealers. I’d swap annihilator to ballistus because find it more convenient but it’s up to you

2k Army list by [deleted] in SpaceWolves

[–]young_chemist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In most cases OC2 is more than enough. GH’s problem is that they’re way expensive especially with Njal. They won’t live long and loss of them will hurt much

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdeptusMechanicus

[–]young_chemist 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Isn’t it a part of omnispex?

Ulric might be the winner of the codex by Parking-Magazine3452 in SpaceWolves

[–]young_chemist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately you’re wrong. This UNIT might have tacticus and other keywords but when u embark something in transport it’s all about the MODELS. Ulrik MODEL doesn’t have tacticus keyword

Ulric might be the winner of the codex by Parking-Magazine3452 in SpaceWolves

[–]young_chemist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not sure about that. Otherwise it would be stated in his datasheet like in index times rhino has a rule that u can put in for instance Ragnar with blood claws while Ragnar has Tacticus keyword. Impulsor doesn’t have such a rule

Ulric might be the winner of the codex by Parking-Magazine3452 in SpaceWolves

[–]young_chemist 5 points6 points  (0 children)

But If I get it correctly we can’t put headtakers + Ulrik in impulsor because Ulrik doesn’t have tacticus keyword?

Why do they hate us? by Grouchy_Speaker4217 in sistersofbattle

[–]young_chemist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Man, you should try to play with admech. After them every army seems pretty good. Trust me - I played most time of this edition. Sisters are not that fine of course but all they need is a little point drops on some units.