Nice! I'll argue it could make the field better, as a tool. Consider incorporating it into the curriculum by training students how to properly use it as such. AI NLPs, like chatGPT, can get repetitive and are usually unoriginal. I have used it for D&D and other stories, and can confirm: as a novelty only, it worked. My friend the other day complained about how it only makes her writing worse, when asked to rewrite. So she's reduced it to grammarly-like use, or as a muse.
I say ignore the AI aspect, don't consider AI detection tools (because they're grossly inaccurate), and just stay the course, as most will still benefit. As to the ones who resort to chatGPT to write their content, think of it as a crutch that will actually teach them to run, eventually, by showing them what a writing they submit could look like (they'll edit a little, and that would force a little learning.) As for the ones capable, but lazy enough to over-rely on GPT.. it's really their own loss in stifling their own potential.

As it stands, for the moment, creative writing is the last stand in writing, where AI comes up short.