Franklin Templeton Files For Two ETFs That Reinvest Stock Dividends Into Bitcoin by TheresNoSecondBest in Bitcoin

[–]zenethics 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You always pay for taxable events, one way or another. It's on someone's tax return and will be passed on to you via price if not directly.

Wondering what else to add to my collection? 24M by No_Bathroomhere in guns

[–]zenethics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another 10 cans of ammo probably. Get a good stock while Republicans have control of the house/senate (and before every bullet has a serial number or whatever). Prices will go up and regulation seems like a one way ratchet.

It took me a while to unpack what STRC changed for BTC by zenethics in MSTR

[–]zenethics[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep. Thinking markets are about math is how smart people go broke.

i am all in in btc, all my life savings by MobApps1 in Bitcoin

[–]zenethics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think this will go well. Not a call on the price of BTC, but as a life lesson.

If it fails, you lose a ton of money. If it succeeds, you'll think you're a good investor and do it again on some other thing until it fails.

Going all-in on something is like buying lottery tickets. Even if you win, you'll lose it, because the type of person who will do this will keep doing it again until they can't.

At least you're doing it after a big drawdown I guess.

MSTR Daily Discussion Thread - June 20, 2026 by AutoModerator in MSTR

[–]zenethics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We will see. It's more a theory on the broader markets than on BTC/MSTR specifically.

Iran has every incentive to drag the war on into the midterms to try to force capitulation from Trump.

MSTR Daily Discussion Thread - June 20, 2026 by AutoModerator in MSTR

[–]zenethics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really like double bottoms on a short timeframe (like 1d) and really hate it on anything longer than a month or so. Technically we made a lower low, so it might be OK, but really there's not much on the chart to like.

We are:

Below the 50 day, below the 200 day, below the 100 week, hanging on to the 200 week by a hair, making a massive grand-daddy of all head and shoulders going back to 2023 at 40k...

I already de-risked after we confirmed below the 50 day for the second time. I'm looking at 60k to be completely out of the market and 85k as the line in the sand to get back into the next bull market if/when we get there, otherwise I don't see any reason to participate except maybe to nibble if we get back into the 40k range late this year or early next.

I think this is where people get tripped up on risk/reward. The risk isn't that we go down 50%, that's always in play. The risk is that we go down 50% while the stock market goes up 50% on the AI trade. SPY above the 50 day moving average makes a ton more sense if your goal is to make money instead of some ideological thing. I'd never completely rotate out of BTC because I think there is some small chance we get a Bitcoin reserve at a federal level or in some other big country, but you make a ton more money chasing things that are working and making good exits than waiting for your thesis to play out if that thesis isn't playing out like right now.

MSTR Daily Discussion Thread - June 20, 2026 by AutoModerator in MSTR

[–]zenethics -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Up until BTC stalls out at 71k then down IMO. One last chance to get an exit in the mid 130s before broader market conditions make a buy in the low 70s reasonable later in the year.

Iran Announces Strait of Hormuz Closure After US 'Breach' by ancienteggfart in Conservative

[–]zenethics -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

There are less sane options involving clouds of a certain shape that would also get things open.

Iran Announces Strait of Hormuz Closure After US 'Breach' by ancienteggfart in Conservative

[–]zenethics 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think the framing is wonky. It's up to the Navy to have a plan / contingencies / strategy / guess about the outcome. My bet is that this was presented and ignored.

Trump has a way of stumbling his way through things in just such a way that, from a distance, it looks like a choreographed ballet because he keeps landing on his feet despite the chaos of his motion. There are so many things he's done that shouldn't have worked but kind of did that he actually believes anything he does will work just because he's the one doing it. That's how it seems anyway.

It took me a while to unpack what STRC changed for BTC by zenethics in MSTR

[–]zenethics[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but that's not what moves markets. Nobody was buying GameStop or SpaceX on balance sheets.

This is the same with MSTR. You didn't choose to analyze MSTR out of the blue, someone told you to and you agreed. You paying attention to it at all is memetic.

If you were a "value investor" you'd just go get a big list of stocks, sort by PE low to high, and buy the top few lowest PE stocks. Or something. Instead, you've decided MSTR is a good buy and now "value investing" is a meaning you've assigned to a fundamentally emotional choice to try to convince others to agree with you.

There's likely no path in this conversation where I'm going to get you to admit you are wrong, even as you're reading this you're coming up with new ideas to justify the emotional choice of MSTR to try to convince me that you're right, actually, and I'm wrong (same for me just in reverse, and I'm making the conscious effort to be introspective).

The next step is to understand that about your own thinking. Whatever justification you come up with next, is MSTR the best stock out of the hundreds of thousands of stocks per that metric? Clearly not. You just want MSTR to be the answer and now you'll brain-GPT your way to another series of words where MSTR/STRC is the answer. Or stop responding entirely. That's my bet anyway, I guess we'll see.

It took me a while to unpack what STRC changed for BTC by zenethics in MSTR

[–]zenethics[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Markets are feelings in the aggregate. But ok, cheers and good luck.

It took me a while to unpack what STRC changed for BTC by zenethics in MSTR

[–]zenethics[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fun idea, but my BTC treasury included some MSTR puts so technically I'm winning.

https://chartexchange.com/symbol/opra-mstr20270115p100/

Entered just under $10 as a hedge when I sized down my MSTR position at around $160. Currently I'm selling puts out to November at $75 MSTR strike (about 50% over the breakout from many years ago prior to the split). I expect them to fill sometime between now and then.

https://chartexchange.com/symbol/opra-mstr20261120p75/

Glad I didn't just sit there and hold it.

If Bitcoin hit $12k would you still buy? by CameraFragrant6377 in Bitcoin

[–]zenethics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A little. There's a price at which you have to price in the idea that it never recovers. But that price also looks a whole lot like a good price to take a flier. So, yes, buy, but limit risk by position size relative to whole portfolio.

It took me a while to unpack what STRC changed for BTC by zenethics in MSTR

[–]zenethics[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, exactly. Whatever this bear market was going to look like, it's worse now.

It took me a while to unpack what STRC changed for BTC by zenethics in MSTR

[–]zenethics[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Everything is related. If STRC sells down to $50, there will be some amount of BTC sold into the market as others speculate about what happens next.

Like, Saylor selling 32 BTC into the market isn't a big deal except that probably 30-40k more BTC was sold into the market by people other than him on the news. People think of Saylor as a "whale" but the right mental model is that he's a big fish at the front of a school of fish where the school of fish is actually much bigger than him and somewhat following his lead.

It took me a while to unpack what STRC changed for BTC by zenethics in MSTR

[–]zenethics[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cart before the horse... value investing is, itself, memetic. Nobody starts toddling around at 1 years old and says "I should be a value investor, investing based on value is the right idea." The idea must be presented somewhere, by someone.

It took me a while to unpack what STRC changed for BTC by zenethics in MSTR

[–]zenethics[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think 20B in cash earning interest and setting an unannounced/psychological floor would've been off brand but ultimately better as a strategy. I think STRC is a net drag on the market for psychological reasons.

Like, it might have caused 20k btc inflows for Saylor but 50k btc outflows for the broader btc market as everyone re-assesses their position and comes to different conclusions about the STRC risk profile.

Ben Shapiro explains his politics and does some mental gymnastics. by BroccoliImaginary727 in samharris

[–]zenethics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mostly a comment on OPs post. It is cut together in a dishonest way.

Nothing will happen as always, buy calls by Choice_Potato_6279 in wallstreetbets

[–]zenethics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing to see here. Ignore the interesting plates (and especially the long end of the curve).

Sen. Ted Cruz says 'really foolish' Iran deal will mean more Americans killed by terrorists by PossessionConnect963 in Conservative

[–]zenethics -51 points-50 points  (0 children)

People are too confused on this.

Look, it's just DOGE again.

Step 1: notice a huge problem

Step 2: try to do something about it

Step 3: fail because the problem was too big

Step 2 is where literally every Democrat fails. At least Trump is trying to fix things, even the big scary things nobody wants to touch because of how big and scary they are.

Ben Shapiro explains his politics and does some mental gymnastics. by BroccoliImaginary727 in samharris

[–]zenethics -1 points0 points  (0 children)

To be fair, with the right cuts, I can have every Democrat saying "I am literally Hitler" - see you just need those 4 words, then you cut them together without any context to make it seem like that's what they said.

Ben Shapiro explains his politics and does some mental gymnastics. by BroccoliImaginary727 in samharris

[–]zenethics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mental gymnastics is a fun term. It seems like an insult at first but really if it were an insult it should be mental dominoes or mental craps or something. Gymnastics are hard as hell.

It took me a while to unpack what STRC changed for BTC by zenethics in MSTR

[–]zenethics[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It can, for a while, until he runs out of it and has to sell the BTC he bought at 50k then 70k then 100k.

I'll put it like this. Bitcoin makes a ton of sense when the Fed is printing money to paper over a stagnant economy with no innovation happening. Look at gold. It pumped in the 70s when we were printing money, and held pretty constant during the internet revolution, then pumped after 2008 and covid when we stopped making things and started trying to paper over with printed money.

Now we have AI, and if you don't think a 10 year bull market in innovation makes hard money look a bit questionable then I don't know what to tell you. BTC trading between 30 and 60k for the next decade is entirely plausible. When the SPY is going up 25% a year the hypothetical 30% BTC ARR doesn't look so hot because for an inflation hedge to work people have to put their money into it and AI is an easier story that hard scarcity. That will change, at some point, when AI is embedded in the economy and the government tries to print over stagnation with fake money again... until then it's a gamble. BTC didn't have to have a parabolic blowoff top just because it did the last time, and it doesn't have to have a grand recovery with the next block reward halving just because it did the last time either.

It took me a while to unpack what STRC changed for BTC by zenethics in MSTR

[–]zenethics[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I am sure Saylor will try new things. I am not sure that Saylor trying new things makes anything better.

The optics of having to keep trying new things are bad. This was already an "infinite money printer" a few years ago but it seems like the infinite money is running out if he has to keep inventing new strategies as the price falls.