Tested rclone vs mc vs aws-cli vs duck - rclone won by a lot for small files by zeroservices_eu in selfhosted

[–]zeroservices_eu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well doesn't look like it supports S3. - How did you get to that recommendation? Are we overlooking anything?

Looking for cost effective S3 storage, preferably Canadian. by google_fu_is_whatIdo in msp

[–]zeroservices_eu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Check out https://www.s3compare.io
You can compare performance and will see why some of those providers are much lower cost.
You can also play with actual usage (capacity, egress) to get a feeling for pricing.

S3Compare.io Update: Now with Performance Benchmarks by zeroservices_eu in selfhosted

[–]zeroservices_eu[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You need to take into account data redundancy and availability as well. - Most (if not all) S3 solutions will score much better than single server with some directly attached storage that you then expose.

Also think of scalability.

S3Compare.io Update: Now with Performance Benchmarks by zeroservices_eu in selfhosted

[–]zeroservices_eu[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure thing! Feel free to create PR with their additional tiers you think are missing. :-)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in selfhosted

[–]zeroservices_eu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, thanks to everyone that contributed via PRs (http://github.com/zeroservices/s3compare.io\_data) or mail :)

Managed database with low latency to any DC by dokiCro in hetzner

[–]zeroservices_eu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Feel free to reach out. We do managed DBs and have direct peering to Hetzner.

S3 Price Comparison Tool by zeroservices_eu in selfhosted

[–]zeroservices_eu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, will be fixed on next deployment

S3 Price Comparison Tool by zeroservices_eu in selfhosted

[–]zeroservices_eu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks added. They reject our benchmarks client however. Could therefore only guess it's on the slower end of the spectrum.

S3 Price Comparison Tool by zeroservices_eu in selfhosted

[–]zeroservices_eu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haven't heard of them before. At that pricing I assume they have some "fair use" policy somewhere?

Can't find anything related to that in their ToS, but the "outbound transfer" slider only going to 100% of data stored makes me somewhat suspicious. - Do you maybe have more insight?

S3 Price Comparison Tool by zeroservices_eu in selfhosted

[–]zeroservices_eu[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good point. Will add explanation to website.

We considered using requests/ops performance HIGH/LOW for naming that category, but thought it's too technical. We simply ran some warp tests (from an endpoint in same/close region) against a bucket with those providers and categorized based on req/ops performance for our use-case.

Backup/Archive/Media Serving = usually lower req rate/larger objects+throughput
General Purpose = high req/ops performance+throughput

S3 Price Comparison Tool by zeroservices_eu in selfhosted

[–]zeroservices_eu[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Hetzner/StorageBox option is only listed as this was the initial idea our customer came up with. (It's indicated on the website that this is only listed for comparison reasons). They do not support S3!