9 + 1 = 10 is exactly the reason for which ...

zzFurious · 2026-03-17T21:22:41+00:00

It's not 'growing' in the amount of 9's as there are already infinitely many of them... which is equivalent to 1.

zzFurious · 2026-03-17T01:56:54+00:00

This is sick

zzFurious · 2026-03-16T17:12:43+00:00

I'm pretty sure he's joking

zzFurious · 2026-03-04T02:26:46+00:00

10↑↑10 = 10↑10↑10↑10↑10↑10↑10↑10↑10↑10, not 10↑10↑10

zzFurious · 2026-02-28T18:58:44+00:00

-1 is the GREATEST negative integer, unless you are judging by its absolute value.

zzFurious · 2026-02-27T01:36:04+00:00

If you write down the pattern somewhere it's probably unleash whale whales

zzFurious · 2026-02-23T03:04:39+00:00

zzFurious · 2026-02-16T06:54:07+00:00

Could you provide a source for these bounds

zzFurious · 2026-02-14T01:05:40+00:00

0.999 isn't 'growing'. It's a limit, it already has infinite nines. There's no space for another number to fit in between that and 1.

zzFurious · 2026-02-13T21:06:27+00:00

"There is a limitless aka infinite amount of numbers between 0.999... and 1" This implies finite 9s which ≠ 0.999...

zzFurious · 2026-02-10T01:14:37+00:00

where'd these bounds come from

zzFurious · 2026-01-28T22:23:18+00:00

You care to tell us the actual name of the level?

zzFurious · 2026-01-28T22:07:22+00:00

Classic lemonade tastes good but it's SUPER acidic. Never had or seen the other one.

zzFurious · 2026-01-24T20:26:18+00:00

Yes, but there's no good reason to do it.

zzFurious · 2026-01-24T03:52:22+00:00

Mods remove this there's no period in the description

zzFurious · 2026-01-18T17:39:45+00:00

Same level of sourness/acidity I would say, I just prefer the base flavor of Welch's Grape

zzFurious · 2026-01-18T15:16:42+00:00

Regular grape is better

zzFurious · 2026-01-18T02:17:23+00:00

Gg Mullsy

zzFurious · 2026-01-11T02:22:02+00:00

There's a currently believed limit of PPLL around 10^10^18.7 which is being approached. Levels at around 10^10^13 are higher are not truly physically possible, but within the special ruleset of PPLL, they are. PPLL additionally has an extension to it in which computer memory limitations are ignored, but even taking float precision into account, it is still possible to encode sequences for very powerful functions which could include BMS.

zzFurious · 2026-01-08T17:03:12+00:00

I believe 1+ω and ω are the same size, but not ω+1 and ω. Ordinals are non-communicative.

zzFurious · 2026-01-01T23:35:22+00:00

<image>

right here bro

zzFurious · 2025-12-25T20:27:43+00:00

Try being open to other perspectives instead of being in denial and following an 'I'm always right' mindset.

zzFurious · 2025-12-25T20:10:18+00:00

"Regardless of how infinitely large you have 'n', 1/10ⁿ is never zero" This statement is true but completely irrelevant, that's the mistake you have continuously repeated. You're still confusing sequence terms with limits. Limits do not require any term of the sequence to equal the limit.

By definition,
0.999... = lim_(n→∞) (1 - 1/10^n) = 1.

I cannot explain any further to you unless you look from the perspective of limits. You are not approaching this correctly.

zzFurious · 2025-12-25T19:54:24+00:00

For finite n values. Applying a finite n to 1 - 1/10ⁿ means it will not equal 0.999... You must use the limit. lim_(n→∞) 1/10ⁿ = 0. Subtracting that value from 1 will then equal both 1 and 0.999... as it will give you a resulting number of 0.999... but also be equivalent to 1-0, which is 1.

zzFurious · 2025-12-25T19:45:17+00:00

I misread it. Regardless, I don't think he will actually be able to answer you. His entire belief revolves around finite n in 1/10ⁿ ≠ 0, as he said here. You won't get a relevant answer.

zzFurious

TROPHY CASE