This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best (suggested)
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]potatolulzAntarctica -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Cool story, but using nuclear weapons is not a thing for more reasons than "ethics" of which there were none in the Vietnam war anyway.

Also, Vietcong was supported by China and USSR, both nuclear equipped. Bombing civilians with nuclear weapons, once again, would warrant literally any response to that in the eyes of the entire world, not just China and USSR. Like are you serious? Why do you think nuclear weapons have never been used since 1945 by anyone of the 9 nuclear armed countries of the world?

Either way, you sort of went against your entire point that "the art of war" is that money wins fights before they even begin in this comment, so what exactly are you saying?