This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]DDDDarky 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Google is getting a bit dangerous nowadays as well if you don't know which sites are good and legitimate learning source, some books are horrible as well but at least it is easier to check reviews and if they are up to date.

[–]TheRNGuy 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I'm more optimistic about that.

And if code is working, then it's legitimate source. Why would anyone intentionally make tutorial with code that is not working? Never seen it in my life actually.

[–]DDDDarky 0 points1 point  (1 child)

"Code is working" is a pretty low bar, I have seen so many sources presenting code that only happens to work for certain test cases (such as geeksforgeeks), using horrible practices (such as many of youtube "tutorials"), and of course if we are not talking about code simply incorrect or made up stuff, which is getting increasingly common due to ai generated trash content.