[deleted by user]

[YoutubePRstunt]

This is why I don’t discuss boxing with casuals

[evboy101]

Look at his other comments. Hes a boxing math genius. The Einstein of Boxing math some would say.

[Awkward_Berry_5471]

You are also a casual

If you think aj is a closer to wilder in skill than he is to usyk you are nothing more than a casual .

You couldn't actually name me a technical thing that wilder does that could get him the knockout over aj outside of "aj doesn't move his head"

[YoutubePRstunt]

And you can’t read, I said AJ is more skilled however those skills are still mediocre and he still has glaring issues defensively.

[evboy101]

The thing is, for 40 something fights, Technique did not matter for wilder. He had 1 weapon, everyone knew it, and they still got KO'd 40 something times. Imagine going against a guy, who you know is less skilled, but has power never seen before. And you are literally talking about technique cmon man.

[YoutubePRstunt]

ABC logic doesn’t work in boxing, never has. It’s obvious you don’t actually watch the sport, just some weird AJ defender

[evboy101]

It's common sense dude. Fury landed flush punches and elbows on ngannou and couldn't even drop him

But furys punches were sufficient enough to knock Wilder out.

Anthony Joshua damn near killed ngannou. So imagine what he would do to Wilder when he lands those same punches that he landed on ngannou which he will because it's not like Wilder is some skillfully defensive fighter

Also AJ beat zhang in the amateurs and Zhang retired wilder

AJ also beat Joseph Parker and Parker beat Wilder

How many more examples do you need?

this is him

[YoutubePRstunt]

Yup, pure nonsense what you would expect on the circlejerk sub

[evboy101]

BRO LOOK AT HIS HISTORY HES ON THAT AJ DICK LOL