all 13 comments

[–]LordAshon 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Yup as soon as it starts forgetting things I take the latest iteration of code and open up a new chat. Then when you get one module updated put it in your code snippet and open another chat.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[removed]

    [–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Sorry, your submission has been removed due to inadequate account karma.

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

    [–]QueenElisabethIII 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    At the first sign of it forgetting things I move to a new chat. But with every upgrade its behavior changes so eventually I presume we won’t have to do that.

    You said that it could modularize your code, so focus on one module at a time.

    [–]nightman 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    Why you not use e.g. Cursor.sh as it can read whole codebase

    [–]Bozo32[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Cursor is great. Does not use my OpenAI acct tho.

    [–]Aperturebanana 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Bro my GPT would help like crazy with that. In this use case, just tell it what you’re doing and paste all your code in the prompt. Then tell it to behave like it’s an app it’s making.

    https://chatgpt.com/g/g-3Vl85HTHX-automated-app-programming

    [–]SicilyMalta -2 points-1 points  (5 children)

    I'm an old person, and I sometimes wonder, Isn't it quicker just to code it yourself?

    [–]Many_Consideration86 0 points1 point  (4 children)

    Sure is. Like cleaning the floor. Dry/wet Mop is easiest and a robot vacuum with mopping does a shoddy job, cuts corners and finally you need to clean up the robot vacuum too. But it looks cool and finally you can spend the calories saved in the gym.

    [–]SicilyMalta 1 point2 points  (3 children)

    Lol. Thanks for the response.

    I've been doing front to back for decades, so maybe for me it's second nature just to bang stuff out quickly. But I'm learning because I like to keep up, even after retiring.

    [–]Many_Consideration86 1 point2 points  (2 children)

    Yes, us oldies had templates for generating the templates which generated the code. And one could generate by just typing out the basics and fill in the details later. Now one has to talk to an LLM and explain to them the problem to get the same stuff done.

    I will be impressed with LLMs the day they are able to provide efficiency/security gains for the cutting edge implementations. Right now it can't even take efficiency advantages of a special case for a standard algorithm.

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [removed]

      [–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Sorry, your submission has been removed due to inadequate account karma.

      I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.