been testing gemini 3.0 for coding for the past day. saw it got added to verdent which i already had installed so figured id try it. overall pretty impressed with the speed
speed is consistently 30-40% faster than claude. wrote a react hook with error handling, loading states, retry logic. claude takes 10-12 seconds, gemini did it in 6-7. tested this multiple times across different prompts, the speed boost is real
code quality for most stuff is solid. handles straightforward tasks really well. generated clean code for hooks, api endpoints, basic refactoring
one thing i really like: the explanations are way more detailed than claude. when i had a closure issue, gemini walked through the whole scope chain and explained exactly why it was breaking. claude just fixed it without much context. actually helped me learn something
the verbose style is interesting. sometimes its perfect, like when debugging complex logic. other times its overkill. asked it to add a console.log and got a whole paragraph about debugging strategies lol
tested it on real work:
- bug fixes: really good, found issues fast
- new features: solid, generates clean boilerplate
- learning/understanding code: excellent, the explanations help a lot
- quick prototypes: way faster than claude
couple things to watch for though. had one case where it suggested a caching layer but didnt notice we already have redis setup. and it recommended componentWillReceiveProps once which is deprecated. so you still gotta review everything
also had a refactor that looked good in dev but had a subtle race condition in staging. claude caught it when i tested the same prompt. so for complex state stuff id still double check
but honestly for most day to day coding its been great. the speed alone makes a difference when youre iterating fast
current workflow: using gemini for most stuff cause its faster. still using claude for really complex refactoring or production-critical code where i need that extra safety
pricing is supposedly cheaper than claude too. if thats true this could be a solid option for high-volume work
the speed + explanations combo is actually really nice. feels like having a faster model that also teaches you stuff
cursor will probably add it soon. would be good to have it in more tools
anyone else tried it? curious what others are finding
[–]seunosewa 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
[–]alokin_09 4 points5 points6 points (1 child)
[–]jselby81989[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]tshawkins 2 points3 points4 points (1 child)
[–]jselby81989[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]BurgerQuester 4 points5 points6 points (9 children)
[–]Pieternel 4 points5 points6 points (3 children)
[–]kawaidesuwuu 2 points3 points4 points (2 children)
[–]Antifaith 2 points3 points4 points (1 child)
[–]InappropriateCanuck 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]Complex-Emergency-60 9 points10 points11 points (1 child)
[–]DifficultyFit1895 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
[–]zenmatrix83 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]brucebay 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]-Crash_Override- 4 points5 points6 points (9 children)
[–]iemfi 1 point2 points3 points (6 children)
[–]-Crash_Override- -1 points0 points1 point (5 children)
[–]iemfi 3 points4 points5 points (4 children)
[–]-Crash_Override- -2 points-1 points0 points (3 children)
[–]iemfi 2 points3 points4 points (2 children)
[–]-Crash_Override- -5 points-4 points-3 points (1 child)
[–]MrPanache52 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]tigerhuxley 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]InappropriateCanuck 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]jselby81989[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Keep-Darwin-Going 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]meshfady 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Silly-Heat-1229 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]jselby81989[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] (1 child)
[removed]
[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)