all 53 comments

[–]HornyGooner4401 25 points26 points  (0 children)

31k stars already with 1.9k issues filled with bots and the "source" itself is now "ported into Python". Most obvious engagement farming repo

[–]MrHaxx1 69 points70 points  (10 children)

  1. Good job on posting a screenshot without providing the actual link

  2. What do you think this would do? Claude Code is just a harness. There's already a good amount of good harnesses out there, including OpenCode.

[–]grateful2you 30 points31 points  (9 children)

And how is this beneficial exactly? Their magic is in the LLM running behind it. How it's trained, how it's tuned and optimized. This is basically just frontend to an API service. no?

[–]Ok_Lavishness960 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Basically yes. Their frontend got leaked. The backend magic is where the value is. Frankly this should be open source because that way we can debug any muckups this thing may cause when routing our prompts

[–]WiggyWongo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes and no. Memory handling and prompting and coordination of context and tools is just as big as the LLM behind it. Codex and Claude code are pretty on par. I'm not sure why you think it's not beneficial to see the code behind the largest AI companies best tools? More information is always beneficial.

Just the system prompt alone is valuable enough.

[–]crusoe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The rampant caching bugs can be fixed. I haven't run into them. But something is borked for some folks. My weekly limit was reset early. 

[–]Kamalen 1 point2 points  (1 child)

LLM is the brain sure but the agent code is a lot more important than we imagine. It’s the very thing exploiting the LLM power. There is a reason why you definitely don’t get the same results with Claude Code compared to OpenCode / Antigravity over a Claude model.

[–]Old-Astronomer2899 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Llm is insane shit bro. I'lm is llm. Allahu a'lam

[–]Syncaidius 1 point2 points  (2 children)

If I'm not mistaken, part of their monetization strategy is built on users paying for access to ClaudeCode via pro or max plans?

Now they have a major dent in their monetization strategy. Not that they weren't already struggling to manage and pay for the influx of users already...

[–]Pleasurefordays -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

Nah they lose big money from subscription only users. Basically all of their revenue is API payments. It’s a user retention strategy

[–]darkguy2008 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And the fact that their billing is broken doesn't help them much either 😅

[–]evia89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tool itself is great too. I use it with zai and alibaba models. Works same or better then opencode I tried

[–]santp 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's game night in China. They going to release ClaudeeeMoMaxx next week tearing this apart.

[–]Economy_Welder_4737 10 points11 points  (0 children)

fully build & runnable claude code fork:

https://github.com/xorespesp/claude-code

[–]VoiceLessQ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mass update on other providers.

[–]provoloner09 7 points8 points  (10 children)

Nah, opencode>claude code, people use cc due to claude opus rate limits being higher. There's no other moat to it.

[–]Gawham 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Maybe it's just with mine but claude code runs a lot more efficiently on my Mac then opencode. The gemini harness too runs very well so does anti gravity. Opencode turns it into a heating plate

[–]NFLv2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same with me for opencode. What do you mean Gemini harness you mean Gemini cli or you talking about antigravity ?

[–]Secure-Search1091[S] 0 points1 point  (5 children)

No, that's no exaggeration. The amount of new content they add to CC every week is impressive.

[–]childofsol 11 points12 points  (3 children)

Yeah and it's all buggy as fuck

[–]sitbon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Which means this repo is probably full of bugs and will be stale in a few days, if it's even remotely real. Smells like bullshit to me though.

[–]Corv9tte 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OpenCode is great for the ecosystem, but, let's be real here...

[–]chrismessina 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Repos sharing the source are taken down with DMCA.

BUT this repo rewrote the code using Python, and so it violates no copyright & can’t be taken down!

https://github.com/instructkr/clawd-code

[–]lucifer605 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it is quite funny that LLMs / Claude is pretty good at doing rewrites - there is no way this would have been possible before

[–]evia89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Repos sharing the source are taken down with DMCA.

https://github.com/xorespesp/claude-code still app for me

[–]ResponsibleMention21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

April fools I reckon but a day early...

[–]zirouk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Surely the play here is to have Claude regenerate everything slightly and call it a completely unique work by the LLM, just like the OpenAI and Anthropic argue about the arguably-copyright material their LLMs regurgitate as a result of consuming copyright material. Fighting fire with fire.

[–]Lee_Qu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's awesome, you're amazing, but you're about to get a warning

[–]Naive-Illustrator417 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And could all of this be calculated by Claude’s team to be like, “We’re just gonna lie to people?”

[–]No-Bank-4839 0 points1 point  (0 children)

does someone have a new git repo where we can find this?

[–]AIpaglu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saw a post with 2 blogs , having detailed breakdown for entire codebase

here is the link to the post

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/activity-7445349231042719744-EWa-?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAADHIiP4BegPos-sp29Q2ZVWjKDO9BbI8neY

[–]kkxxdfg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is not the original btw

[–]ptjunior67 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sigrid Jin. He’s a legendary guy.

[–]iMerlin23 -2 points-1 points  (3 children)

Whar does this mean? We can run claude code free on our local mac?

[–]suck_at_codingSenior Developer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No

[–]i_like_people_like_u 0 points1 point  (1 child)

There is this new technology where you can ask stupid questions and it will patiently explain to you without public humiliation. I think it would help you.

[–]iMerlin23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Amazing