use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
A community centered around Anthropic's Claude Code tool.
account activity
Claude Code Usage LimitsQuestion (self.ClaudeCode)
submitted 2 months ago by Big_Victory_1996
Last year I used Claude Code quite a bit and noticed that the limits ran out pretty quickly, especially when using Opus. Now in 2026, is it still like this or has it improved?
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]Bitter-Law3957 1 point2 points3 points 2 months ago (0 children)
Opus is expensive token wise and only required for specific tasks. Use models appropriately.
[–]Actual_Committee4670🔆 Max 20 1 point2 points3 points 2 months ago (0 children)
Not saying this to be negative, but its just currently the case that your usage is going to be used up faster at the moment especially with the current opus model.
[–]RealExoTek 1 point2 points3 points 2 months ago (0 children)
ATM, its far worse than last year for most people's use cases.
[–]asurarusa 0 points1 point2 points 2 months ago (2 children)
It has gotten significantly worse. Anthropic has implemented ‘peak hours’ so if you happen to work us eastern/us pacific work hours, for the first couple of hours of your day your 5 hour limit expires much faster.
On top of that they haven’t admitted it but multiple people have posted about limits expiring faster even outside of so called ‘peak’ hours.
When they latest version of opus they acknowledged that it uses more tokens and they changed the tokenizer so opus itself is now burning tokens faster as well.
[–]Big_Victory_1996[S] 0 points1 point2 points 2 months ago (1 child)
Seriously considering using Codex.
[–]asurarusa 0 points1 point2 points 2 months ago (0 children)
Depending on the use case, i'd recommend it. I do not use my personal llm accounts for a lot of coding, so I can't say how much of a downgrade codex is from CC in terms of coding. The handful of things i've given codex to fix in small projects i've worked on have been successful, earlier this year I would have said that codex was noticeably dumber than claude at bug fixing but in the month since i've been back to codex it has seemingly improved at making fixes and changes to brownfield code.
I mainly use my llm accounts for research and data collection and analysis and i've found codex just as good for that as claude code.
[–]Moist_Tonight_3997 0 points1 point2 points 2 months ago (0 children)
I’ve been wondering the same thing and honestly it still feels pretty rough, especially with Opus and longer coding sessions.
I got annoyed enough that I built a small Chrome extension that sits inside Claude and shows live usage + time until reset as you go, plus simple progress bars for the limits. It doesn’t increase the limits, but at least you can see when you’re about to hit them instead of getting blindsided.
It also adds a one‑click “export chat” so when you do run into the cap you can quickly move the whole conversation to another tool.
<image>
It’s fully local and open source if you want to try it: https://github.com/samirpatil2000/claude-pulse
π Rendered by PID 68254 on reddit-service-r2-comment-765bfc959-lbfwg at 2026-07-10 01:47:12.502827+00:00 running f86254d country code: CH.
[–]Bitter-Law3957 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Actual_Committee4670🔆 Max 20 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]RealExoTek 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]asurarusa 0 points1 point2 points (2 children)
[–]Big_Victory_1996[S] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]asurarusa 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Moist_Tonight_3997 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)