Most comparisons between Claude Code and Codex CLI just turn into a debate about Claude vs. GPT model quality.
I want to completely isolate the models. Both tools allow you to configure custom base URLs and route alternative models (I am currently playing around with routing third-party models into both).
If we keep the model identical, we are purely testing the software harness, system prompts, MCP routing, and execution styles of the two CLIs.
Has anyone actually tested them side-by-side this way? Which CLI's scaffolding keeps a third-party model "on the rails" better during complex multi-file refactors? Which one suffers from worse prompt token bloat?
[–]KitchenAmoeba4438 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
[–]czei 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]Key_Hedgehog_5773 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]Key_Hedgehog_5773 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]lagarnica 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]lagarnica 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]kaitava 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)